INSTC: Geopolitical Challenges and Risks. Part 1

To date, not enough generalizing studies have been published in Russia aimed at identifying obvious and hidden geopolitical risks to the INSTC project. The scientific community has not yet developed a general understanding of their actual and imaginary significance, acuteness, interrelationships and interdependence. This is not surprising since the country’s leadership has only recently come to understand the strategic importance and geo-economic significance of INSTC. Since initially the main attention of the leading participants of the project — Russia, Azerbaijan and Iran — was focused on the “western branch line” of the INSTC, it was on this route that the foreign policy challenges from the United States and the EU, Turkey, India and China, as well as Pakistan, the republics of Central Asia and Armenia. At the same time, the main danger to the coordinated work of the Russian Federation, Azerbaijan and Iran within the framework of the project comes from the United States and its NATO allies. Without hiding their hostility to the Russian Federation, Iran and China, they are making efforts to involve Azerbaijan and other former Soviet republics in their geopolitical game in the South Caucasus. Turkish “pan-Turkists” have a certain influence on Baku’s behavior, seeking to shift its attention to the TITR project. In this case, they are impressed by the fact that it enjoys the support of the West. The geopolitical challenges and risks include the Azerbaijani Iranian and Azerbaijani-Indian contradictions, India’s competition with China and Pakistan in Central Asia, and Armenia’s claim to create a parallel to INSTC transport infrastructure. The article explains the background and scale of all these challenges and risks for Russia and the INSTC project, their thoroughness, imaginary and actual severity. According to the author, the main challenge (in fact, a threat) to the project today comes from the United States, which has intensified its participation in the reconciliation of Baku and Yerevan. In this regard, Washington’s desire to oust the Russian Federation from Armenia and turn it into a state controlled by the West, as well as to conclude a deal with Turkey and Azerbaijan at the expense of Armenia by forcibly implementing the Zangezur transport corridor project, is alarming.

1. Alikberov E. Sh., Alikberova A. R. Sino-Indian relations at the present stage: a review // Modern Oriental study. 2020. Vol. 2. N 4. P. 71–79. (In Russ.)

2. Aristova L. B. Formation of a single Eurasian transport space with the development of the MTK // Greater Eurasia: development, security, cooperation. Materials of the Fifth International Scientific and Practical Conference “Greater Eurasia: national and civilizational aspects of development and cooperation” / ed. by V. I. Gerasimov. Yearbook. Is. 6. P. 1. Moscow, 2023. P. 389–391. (In Russ.)

3. Vakhshitekh A. N., Lapenko M. V. Development of the Iranian economic zone “Enzeli” within the framework of the international transport corridor “North — South” // Eastern Analytics. 2019. N 2. P. 24–34. (In Russ.)

4. Volodin A. G., Volodina M. A. The project of the international transport corridor “North — South” as a factor of possible strengthening of Russia’s foreign economic relations // Contours of global transformations: politics, economics, law. 2019. Vol. 12. N 6. P. 29–42. (In Russ.)

5. Karavaev A. V., Mandana T. The international transport corridor “North — South” and scenarios of trans-regional integration // Report of the Valdai International Discussion Club. 2019, June. Moscow : Foundation for the Development and Support of the Valdai International Discussion Club, 2019. 32 p. (In Russ.)

6. Kosov G. V., Gukasov A. V. The international transport corridor “North — South”: rethinking the landscape of Eurasia (the case of Azerbaij // The Caspian region: politics, economics, culture. 2019. N 3 (60). P. 212–217. (In Russ.)

7. Lunev S., Yurtaev V. Prospects for establishing partnership relations between India and Iran // International processes. 2021. N 19 (2). P. 121–137. (In Russ.)

8. Malysheva D. B. The international transport corridor “North — South” in the strategy of Russia // Russia and the new states of Eurasia. 2021. N 2 (51). P. 59–72. (In Russ.)

9. Markelov K. A. History and modernity in the development of the international transport corridor “North — South” // The Caspian region: politics, economics, culture. 2022. N 1 (70). P. 98–109. (In Russ.)

10. Martynova E. International transport corridors as a factor in the formation of a Large Eurasian partnership // Russia and the new states of Eurasia. 2023. N III (LX). P. 68–77. (In Russ.)

11. International transport corridor “North — South”: investment solutions and soft infrastructure. Reports and working papers 22/2 / A. Akhunbayev, E. Vinokurov (head of the author’s team), A. Zaboev, N. Usmanov. Almaty. Moscow : Eurasian Development Bank, 2022. 84 p. (In Russ.)

12. Semedov S., Shilova A. The project of the ITC “North — South”: problems and prospects in education // Obozrevatel. 2023. N 2 (397). P. 52–61. (In Russ.)

13. Uyanaev S. V. Relations between India and the USA: the current state and external consequences // USA & Canada: economics, politics, culture. 2022. N 8. P. 63–74. (In Russ.)

14. Fedorova I. E. On Iranian Indian relations // Oriental analytics. 2020. N 3. P. 214–221. (In Russ.)

15. Frolova N. Realizing the potential of the North — South ITC as part of the Greater Eurasia project // Transport Innovations. 2021. N 43. P. 2–5. (In Russ.)

16. Tsvetkov V. A., Zoidov K. H., Medkov A. A. Formation of a new evolutionary concept of increasing the cargo base of the North — South transport corridors: current state, geopolitical conditions and economic prerequisites // Regional problems of economic transformation. 2014. N 9 (47). P. 229–246. (In Russ.)

17. Abdullaev K. N. Development of transport communication between the Republic of Azerbaij and the countries of the European Union on the basis of international transit transport projects “East — West” (Traceca), “North — South” and “South — East” // Account and statistics. 2018. N 3 (51). P. 108–116.

18. Belov (Yurtaev) V. I., Binish India, Russia and Iran: a new study on the international transport corridor “North — South” // Innovations. 2021. Vol. 16. N 4. P. 18–25.

19. Kumukov A. M., Luzyanin S. G. China’s foreign policy strategy in the South Caucasus — a transit window to Europe? // Russia in global Politics. 2024. Vol. 22. N 1. P. 176–193.

20. Sarma Hridai Ch. Transformation of the International North — South Corridor into a “Digital corridor” // State Policy. 2018. N 4. P. 124–138.

21. Vinokurov E., Akhunbaev A., Zaboev A. The International North–South Transport corridor: strengthening Russia’s “turn to the South” and trans-Eurasian relations // Russian Economic Journal. 2022. N 8 (2). P. 159–173.

22. Zakharov A. The international North — South transport corridor: prospects and challenges for ensuring communication between Russia and India // Review of International relations MGIMO. 2023. N 16 (2). P. 216–234.