Tools for Transportation Infrastructure Effectiveness Assessing in Geomarketing Studies
https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2025-2-46-56
EDN: IVYLZN
Abstract
The paper is devoted to the urgent problem of assessing the effectiveness of infrastructure projects in the transport sphere using graph theory and graph models that allow to form the structure of economic, information and other flows, determines the movement of people, transport and goods.
The aim of the work is to study the models of spatial development to assess spatial competition, the effectiveness of infrastructure projects in the transportation sector and to solve geomarketing problems. The paper uses as its main hypothesis the assertion that existing models of spatial development can be complexified through the tools of graph theory.
The main task is to assess the effectiveness of infrastructure projects in the transportation sphere using graph theory, which allows to identify promising areas of strategic planning for the location of business projects.
It is shown that for further in-depth analysis of transport infrastructure sustainability it is necessary to analyze the connectivity of clusters within the graph with the allocation of bridges.
The variants of building a graph model of location and solving analytical problems on its basis rationally using the tools of network and osmnx libraries of python language are shown. An approach to assessing the efficiency of infrastructure projects in the transportation sphere using graph theory is proposed.
The analysis of road graphs allows to determine the optimal routes, intersection points, nodes and highways affecting the efficiency of the entire transport system of the city, which allows to forecast demand in different directions, to determine the most loaded and congested areas, as well as to identify weak links in the transport network.
About the Authors
A. N. Kislyakov
Vladimir branch of Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Alexey N. Kislyakov, Doctor of Economics, Candidate of Technical Sciences, Professor of the Department of Information Technologies
Vladimir
N. E. Tikhonyuk
Vladimir branch of Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Natalia E. Tikhonyuk, Candidate of Economic Sciences, Head of the Department of Economics
Vladimir
M. S. Malov
Vladimir branch of Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Mikhail S. Malov, postgraduate student
Vladimir
References
1. Abramov A. L., Pugach P. A. Graph models of cities. M.: Department of publishing activities of Saratov University, 2021. (In Russ.)
2. Bukharov D. M. Modeling of fractal development of urban structure // Materials of the All-Russian scientific-practical conference with international participation «Spatial development of territories in the conditions of digitalization: socio-ecological-economic systems». Grozny: Spektr, 2020. P. 66–72. (In Russ.)
3. Grekusis D. Methods and practice of spatial analysis. Description, research and explanation with the use of GIS. Moscow: DMK Press, 2021. (In Russ.)
4. Kislyakov A. N. Graph methods for describing the trade profile of the region // Administrative Consulting [Upravlencheskoe konsul’tirovanie]. 2022. N 2. P. 70–80. (In Russ.)
5. Kislyakov A. N. Improvement of methods of spatial data analysis for the tasks of regional mar-kets research // Problems and prospects of development of socio-economic and humanitarian sciences: pedagogy, psychology, economics, jurisprudence: collection of scientific articles, Moscow, December 19, 2023. Saratov: Center of forced migrants «Saratov source», 2024. P. 209–214. (In Russ.)
6. Manaeva I. V., Kanischeva A. V. Zipf's law: cross-country analysis // Economic analysis: theory and practice [Ekonomicheskii analiz: teoriya i praktika]. 2018. Vol. 17, N 7 (478). P. 1337– 1351. (In Russ.)
7. Okunev I. Yu. Fundamentals of spatial analysis: Monograph. Moscow: Aspect Press, 2020. (In Russ.)
8. Pavlov Y. V. Fractals as a tool for territorial planning of agglomeration systems // Fundamental Research [Fundamental’nye issledovaniya]. 2013. N 10. P. 2242–2248. (In Russ.)
9. Romanova A. I., Mironova M. D. Mathematical models of the complex development of cities: Educational and methodical manual. Kazan, 2018. (In Russ.)
10. Sidorov A.V. Urban costs and their role in the theory of central places a lá Christaller-Lesch // Journal of NEA [Zhurnal NEA]. 2018. N 4 (40). P. 12–31. (In Russ.)
11. Hannanova E. A., Ovechkina E. K. Chronological review and analysis of urban development models developed in the USA and Europe in the XVIII–XX centuries // Innovations and Investments [Innovatsii i investitsii]. 2023. N 10. P. 439–445. (In Russ.)
12. Garlaschelli D., Ruzzenenti F., Basosi R. Complex Networks and Symmetry I: A Review // Symmetry. 2010. N 2. P. 1–27.
13. Kuk G., Marijn J. The Business Models and Information Architectures of Smart Cities // Journal of Urban Technology. 2011. N 18 (2). P. 39–52.
14. Tannier C., Pumain D. Fractals in urban geography: a theoretical outline and an empirical example // Cybergeo: European Journal of Geography. 2005. 10.4000/cybergeo.3275.
Review
For citations:
Kislyakov A.N., Tikhonyuk N.E., Malov M.S. Tools for Transportation Infrastructure Effectiveness Assessing in Geomarketing Studies. Administrative Consulting. 2025;(2):46-56. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2025-2-46-56. EDN: IVYLZN
Views:
85
Email this article 