Territorial Collectivity of Alsace: Territorial Reforms in France as a Step to Ethnopolitical Revival of the Region
EDN: XUXXSB
Abstract
Since the 1980s, France has pursued a policy of decentralization to simplify the implementation of at the local level. One such reform in the 2010s, which will be the focus of this paper, halved the number of regions and created an entirely new entity, the Grand Est, which included the two departments of Alsace: Haut-Rhin and Bas-Rhin. Little historical justification for unification and the fear of losing ethnic identity mobilized the population. A compromise was worked out: the European Collectivity (Community) of Alsace emerged, which was called the “superdepartment” — a unique innovation in France.
Purpose: to identify in the historical dynamics, how the territorial-administrative functions of Alsace as a region changed, what powers it has at the moment through the prism of administrative-territorial reforms in France.
Methods: analysis and synthesis of empirical data; system analysis; retrospective approach; comparative analysis.
Results and Discussion: The new law on differentiation, decentralization, deconcentration and various measures to simplify the implementation of local public action (3DS law) was preceded by three acts of decentralization. The first had the task of launching decentralization, the second consolidated the successes in the constitution, the third tried to reduce bureaucratic costs and redistribute powers. The most important for Alsace turned out to be the Third Act, or rather the reaction to it.
Conclusions: French administrative and territorial reforms were one of the main causes of the autonomist threat. To prevent it, the French government approved a referendum on the creation of the European Collectivity (Community) of Alsace. This decision did not eliminate the problem of the so-called historical illegitimacy of the Grand Est region, but allowed the territorial community to develop with additional privileges. The geographical position of Alsace in the center of Europe on the border of Germany and Switzerland and its status as one of the capitals of the EU also played its role.
About the Author
K. R. Podryadchikov
Saint Petersburg State University, Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Kirill R . Podryadchikov, Post-graduate student
Saint Petersburg
References
1. Denisova M. I., Nazarov N. A. History of the formation of the administrative region of Grand Est in France // Innovation. Science. Education [Innovacii. Nauka. Obrazovanie]. 2021. N 31. P. 1860–1865. (In Russ.)
2. Zaharova E. A. Regional reform and its impact on the electoral behavior during 2012 and 2017 presidential elections in France. International Trends [Mezhdunarodnye protsessy]. 2021. Vol. 19, N 3. P. 123–146. (In Russ.)
3. Lukina K. N. Franco-German tandem: content and criticism of the Aachen Treaty // Kazan Bulletin of Young Scientists [Kazanskij vestnik molodyh uchyonyh]. 2020. N 3. P. 131–141. (In Russ.)
4. Markov P. N., Afamgotov E. M., Eshev M. A., Udychak F. N. Organisation of Local Government in the PRC, India and France // Matters of Russian and International Law [Voprosy rossijskogo i mezhdunarodnogo prava]. 2024. Vol. 14. N 6А. P. 11–18. (In Russ.)
5. Maslovskaya T. S. Constitutional transformations in France at the beginning of the 21st century // Journal of the Belarusian State University. Law [Zhurnal Belorusskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Pravo]. 2024. N 1. P. 27–38. (In Russ.)
6. Maslovskaya T. S. Reforming the territorial organisation in France in the context of constitutional reforms in 2003 // Problems and prospects of local self-government development in the Russian Federation and foreign countries [Problemy i perspektivy razvitiya mestnogo samoupravleniya v Rossijskoj Federacii i zarubezhnyh stranah]. Moscow: Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN), 2022. P. 117–123. (In Russ.)
7. Pakhorukov K. I. On the sources of the history of administrative reforms in France (2000-2024) // Modern scientific thought [Sovremennaya nauchnaya mysl’]. 2024. N 4. P. 158–164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24412/2308-264X-2024-4-158-164. (In Russ.)
8. Rudenko A. S. Administrative Reforms in France in the 21st Century: Features and Challenges // Ways of transformation of state and corporate governance at the present stage. Moscow: Buki-Vedi, 2021. P. 204–210. (In Russ.)
9. Semeko G. V. Territorial reform 2014–2015 in France // Federalism [Federalizm]. 2017. N 3. P. 19–32. (In Russ.)
10. Semeko G. V. Territorial reforms in France: from decentralisation to re-centralisation of public administration // Ars Administrandi. 2017. Vol. 9. N 3. P. 476–494. (In Russ.)
11. Bonnet-Pineau E. La réforme régionale en France: une occasion manquée? // Echogéo. 2016. N 35. P. 1–12.
12. Chabrot C. Repenser la décentralisation au fond // AMRF (Association des maires ruraux de France). 2023. P. 1–7.
13. Degoffe M. 1982–2022: quarante ans de décentralisation en France // Titre VII. 2022. N 9 (2). P. 11–18.
14. Duranthon A. Que nous dit la «Collectivité européenne d’Alsace» de l’évolution du droit des collectivités territoriales? [Electronic resource] // Audience solennelle de rentrée du Tribunal administratif de Strasbourg, 2020. URL: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03162993/document (accessed: 05.02.2025).
15. Epstein R. Un demi-siècle après Pierre Grémion Ressaisir la centralisation à partir de la périphérie // Revue française de science politique. 2020. Vol. 70. N 1. P. 101–117.
16. Hulbert F. Décentralisation. Pour un front uni des territoires contre Paris et l’État central. Paris: L’Harmattan, 2021.
17. Janicot L. La décentralisation et l’expérimentation normative // Titre VII. 2022. N 9 (2). P. 46–54.
18. Kleinschmager R. Le référendum sur la collectivité territoriale d’Alsace du 7 avril 2013 // Revue d’Alsace. 2013. N 139. P. 401–420.
19. Parnet C. La métropole, une affaire d’élus. La mise à distance des citoyens dans la réforme territoriale (2012-2016) // Participations. 2020. N 26-27 (1). P. 105–134.
20. Torre A., Bourdin S. The French Territorial Reform of the Regions: Objectives, Risks and Challenges for some Forgotten Territories // International Journal of Public Administration, 2023. N 46 (11). P. 761–772. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2021.2018456.
21. Vergne O., Baudelle G. The ‘Alsace European Authority’: a new step in the ‘territorial differentiation’ in France // European Planning Studies 2020. N 29 (2). P. 312–328.
22. Vergne O. Vers une nouvelle forme de régionalisation en France? Le cas de la collectivité européenne d’Alsace [Electronic resource] // Sud-Ouest européen. 2019. N 48. URL: https:// journals.openedition.org/soe/5820 (accessed: 03.02.2025).
23. Woehrling J.-M. Das Elsass erhält eine neue Gebietskörperschaft. Was bedeutet dies? // Badische Heimat. 2020. N 1. S. 52–66.
24. Youssouf Steinmetz I. Projet de Loi «4D»: un approfondissement de la décentralisation? // Civitas Europa. 2021. N 46 (1). P. 401–411.
Review
For citations:
Podryadchikov K.R. Territorial Collectivity of Alsace: Territorial Reforms in France as a Step to Ethnopolitical Revival of the Region. Administrative Consulting. 2025;(3):160-173. (In Russ.) EDN: XUXXSB
Views:
14
Email this article 