Electronic Governance and the Social Status of Older Citizens: Mechanisms of Inclusion and Stratification in Digital Public Services

The state’s shift to electronic formats of service delivery simultaneously expands the formal availability of services and delineates new contours of social differentiation for older citizens. The official discourse accompanying digital transformation not only describes technical changes but also codifies role expectations regarding recipients of social support measures and participants in governance processes, thereby shaping the distribution of rights and responsibilities. The purpose of the study is to determine how normative and strategic documents construct the roles and status of the older generation, and which institutional mechanisms facilitate or hinder their access to electronic services and their participation in governance practices.
The methods comprise qualitative content analysis with elements of frame analysis of a corpus of federal and regional documents from the past seven years; the unit of analysis consisted of textual fragments that explicitly mention older citizens, mechanisms for easing access, and factors of digital differentiation. Coding proceeded across blocks capturing role representations, inclusion measures, and hidden barriers, followed by axial comparison of categories to identify stable linkages between principles of service delivery and actual regulatory requirements.
The results indicate the predominance of the image of the older citizen as a recipient of benefits and a target of service delivery, with weak institutionalization of active roles of participation and partnership; accessibility measures are predominantly compensatory in nature (preservation of offline alternatives, training, user support, and proactive, application-free provision of certain services). In parallel, a “digital by default” regime is being reinforced, identity verification procedures are becoming more complex, familiar face-to-face channels are being reduced, and incentives tied to online submissions are being introduced, which together draw a dividing line within the age group according to levels of digital skills, resources, and support. The conclusions are that, despite a general orientation toward inclusion, digital modernization reproduces a dependent status for the older generation while simultaneously generating new bases of inequality; to mitigate these effects, it is necessary to institutionalize equivalent multichannel service provision, expand practices of genuine participation by older citizens in the design and evaluation of services, and conduct regular audits of hidden barriers to digital interaction. 

1. Alekseeva O. A., Bestuzheva O. Yu., Vershinskaya O. N., Galyuzhin A. Yu., Skvortsova E. E. New opportunities and risks of the use of e-services by older people // Population [Narodonaselenie]. 2019. Vol. 22. N 1. P. 128–142. DOI 10.19181/1561-7785-2019-00010. (In Russ.).

2. Varlamova Yu. A. The Intergenerational Digital Divide in Russia // Universe of Russia [Mir Rossii]. 2022. Vol. 31. N 2. P. 51–74. DOI 10.17323/1811-038X-2022-31-2-51-74. (In Russ.).

3. Vidyasova L. A. Inclusion in the Digital Environment as a Factor of Active Longevity: Based on Materials from Elderly St. Petersburg Residents’ Study // The State and Citizens in the Electronic Environment. Vol. 8 (Proceedings of the XXVII International Joint Scientific Conference “Internet and Modern Society” (IMS-2024), St. Petersburg, June 24–26, 2024). St Petersburg: ITMO University, 2024. P. 61–68. DOI 10.17586/2541-979X-2024-8-61-68. (In Russ.).

4. Grigorieva I. A., Petukhova I. S. Internet Practices of Older Adults: Ten Years of Development and Research // The State and Citizens in the Electronic Environment. Vol. 3 (Proceedings of the XXII International Joint Scientific Conference “Internet and Modern Society” (IMS2019), St. Petersburg, June 19–22, 2019). St. Petersburg: ITMO University, 2019. P. 78–90. DOI 10.17586/2541-979X-2019-3-78-90. (In Russ.).

5. Dmitrieva A. V. Social Inclusion of Older Adults: Prolonged Employment or “Advanced” Leisure? // Journal of Social Policy Studies [Zhurnal issledovanii sotsial’noi politik]. 2018. Vol. 16. N 1. P. 37–50. DOI 10.17323/727-0634-2018-16-1-37-50. (In Russ.).

6. Dobrinskaya D. E., Martynenko T. S. Perspectives of the Russian information society: Digital divide levels // RUDN Journal of Sociology [Vestnik RUDN. Seriya: Sotsiologiya]. 2019. Vol. 19, N 1. P. 108–120. DOI 10.22363/2313-2272-2019-19-1-108-120. (In Russ.).

7. Kornilova M. V. Elderly People in the Modern World: New Challenges and Opportunities for Adaptation (Based on the Materials of the Conference of Young Scientists at the Institute of Sociology, FCTAS RAS) // Society and Security Insights. 2022. Vol. 5, N 4. P. 195–206. DOI 10.14258/SSI(2022)4-12. (In Russ.).

8. Podolsky A. I., Ermolaeva M. V., Shorkina N. A. The Older Person as a Subject of Study, Support, and Communication: Monograph. Moscow: HSE University Publishing House, 2022. (In Russ.).

9. Popov E. V. Features of Measuring Digital Literacy in Russia // Sociological Studies [Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya]. 2023. N 11. P. 51–61. DOI 10.31857/S013216250028532-8. (In Russ.).

10. Popov E. V. Digital Skills in the Regions of Russia // Sociological Studies [Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya]. 2024. N 6. P. 65–75. DOI 10.31857/S0132162524060065. (In Russ.).

11. Rostovskaya T. K., Tolmachev D. P. Social Communications of the Older Population in Moscow under COVID-19 // Scientific Review. Series 1. Economics and Law [Nauchnoe obozrenie. Seriya 1: Ekonomika i pravo]. 2020. N 3. P. 174–183. DOI 10.26653/2076-4650-2020-3-16. (In Russ.).

12. Smirnykh L. I. Digital Literacy of the Elderly Population and the Digitalization of Enterprises: Experience of European Countries // Economic Questions [Voprosy Ekonomiki]. 2020. N 12. P. 104–124. DOI 10.32609/0042-8736-2020-12-104-124. (In Russ.).

13. Yuzhakov V. N., Pokida A. N., Zybunovskaya N. V., Starostina A. N. Digitalization of interaction between citizens and the state: citizens’ assessment of effects, risks and prospects // Public Administration Issues [Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i munitsipal’nogo upravleniya]. 2023. N 2. P. 33–73. DOI 10.17323/1999-5431-2023-0-2-33-73. (In Russ.).

14. Iarskaia-Smirnova E. R., Yarskaya-Smirnova V. N., Kononenko R. V. Types of Capitals in the Field of “Silver Volunteering” // Sociological Studies [Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya]. 2024. N 3. P. 71–82. DOI 10.31857/S0132162524030067. (In Russ.).

15. Fan M., Epadile M., Qalati S. A., Qureshi N. A. The Effects of eGovernment Efficiency on Subjective Wellbeing // Frontiers in Psychology. 2022. Vol. 13. Art. 768540. DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.768540.

16. Hargittai E., Piper A. M., Morris M. R. From internet access to internet skills: digital inequality among older adults // Universal Access in the Information Society. 2019. Vol. 18. N 4. P. 881–890. DOI 10.1007/s10209-018-0617-5.

17. Helsper E. J., Reisdorf B. C. The emergence of a “digital underclass” in Great Britain and Sweden: Changing reasons for digital exclusion // New Media & Society. 2017. Vol. 19. N 8. P. 1253–1270. DOI 10.1177/1461444816634676.

18. Leukel J., Schehl B., Sugumaran V. Digital inequality among older adults: explaining differences in the breadth of Internet use // Information, Communication & Society. 2023. Vol. 26. N 1. P. 139–154. DOI 10.1080/1369118X.2021.1942951.

19. Linton R. The Study of Man: An Introduction. New York : Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1964.

20. Molnar T. Improving Usability of e-Government for the Elderly // The Electronic Journal of eGovernment. 2015. Vol. 13. N 2. P. 122–135.

21. Robinson L., Cotten S. R., Ono H., Quan-Haase A., Mesch G., Chen W., Schulz J., Hale T. M., Stern M. J. Digital inequalities and why they matter // Information, Communication & Society. 2015. Vol. 18. N 5. P. 569–582. DOI 10.1080/1369118X.2015.1012532.

22. Schou J., Pors A. S. Digital by default? A qualitative study of exclusion in digitalised welfare // Social Policy & Administration. 2019. Vol. 53. N 3. P. 464–477. DOI 10.1111/spol.12470.

23. Seifert A. The Digital Exclusion of Older Adults during the COVID-19 Pandemic // Journal of Gerontological Social Work. 2020. Vol. 63. N 6-7. P. 674–676. DOI 10.1080/01634372.2020.17 64687.

24. Taylor C. The Politics of Recognition // Multiculturalism: Examining the Politics of Recognition. Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press, 1994. P. 25–74. DOI 10.1515/9781400821402-004.

25. United Nations. Department of Economic and Social Affairs. E-Government Survey 2024: Accelerating Digital Transformation for Sustainable Development: with the addendum on Artificial Intelligence [Electronic resource]. New York : United Nations, 2024. URL: https://publicadministration.un.org/ egovkb/en-us/Reports/UN-E-Government-Survey-2024 (date of the address: 14.09.2025).