Russia's Arctic Agenda: Projects, Problems, Digital Solutions
EDN: GEOGKY
Abstract
Relevance. Fundamentally new infrastructure and production solutions implemented in the Arctic macroregion can subsequently be scaled both in the subarctic regions and in the country as a whole, which determines the importance of analyzing Arctic projects, problems, decisions made and updates research into various aspects of the subject area.
Objective of the study: to study the content of Arctic projects (in the context of priority projects of development support zones), problems and digital solutions in their implementation. Research objectives: to characterize priority projects of development support zones; to study advanced cases of oil and gas companies of China and the Russian Federation in the field of artificial intelligence. Research methods: systems approach, logical analysis, synthesis, content analysis of open sources, modeling. Results. The introduction of digital technologies in the implementation of Arctic resource projects consists in the preliminary application of intelligent equipment, the use of big data, machine learning and other IT technologies in the processing and analysis of data for exploration and development. The implementation of AI technologies in the resource industries has just begun and, despite the operational effect obtained, has not yet brought the desired large-scale results. The assessment of the effectiveness of Arctic investment projects should be based on a set of indicators of commercial, socio-economic and budgetary efficiency. The proposed conceptual model for assessing the economic efficiency of DT includes three levels of assessment depending on the maturity of the twin and the genesis of the formation of the economic effect. The maximum economic effect from the implementation of DT is achieved through the automation of decision-making, the integration of DT into production processes in real time and a significant reduction in total operating costs. Autonomous and cognitive DT of a high level of maturity provide management flexibility, a strategic increase in the value of the company and the ability to quickly respond to changes in the external environment.
About the Author
E. A. Kuklina
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (North-West Institute of Management of RANEPA)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Saint Petersburg
References
1. Atemasova E. E., Porotkin E. S. A Comparative Analysis of Digitalization Strategies of Oil Companies // Economics and Production Management. Vol. 1. Samara, 2022. P. 45–46. EDN TVAZXN. (In Russ.).
2. Zhigalov V. M. Assessing Strategic Sustainability in the Context of Economic Sanctions // Humanities and socio-economic sciences [Gumanitarnye i sotsial’no-ekonomicheskie nauki]. 2023. N 5 (132). P. 62–65. DOI 10.18522/1997-2377-2023-132-5-62-65. EDN TYYENJ. (In Russ.).
3. Kuklina E. A. Modern China in the Arctic Economic Space // Eurasian Integration: Economics, Law, Politics [Evraziiskaya integratsiya: ekonomika, pravo, politika]. 2021. Vol. 15. N 1. P. 22–31. DOI 10.22394/2073-2929-2021-01-22-31 (In Russ.).
4. Kuklina E. A. Two Tracks of BRICS Arctic Cooperation // Eurasian Integration: Economics, Law, Politics [Evraziiskaya integratsiya: ekonomika, pravo, politika]. 2023. Vol. 17. N 3. P. 25–37. DOI 10.22394/2073-2929-2023-03-25-37 (In Russ.).
5. Litviakov S. S. Public-private partnership in financing transport infrastructure in the Russian Federation. Moscow: Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, 2014. (In Russ.).
6. Malenkov Yu. A. Strategic resources of companies in new conditions: essence, criteria, management problems // Humanities and socio-economic sciences [Gumanitarnye i sotsial’noekonomicheskie nauki]. 2023. N 5 (132). P. 71–73. EDN CKJBLA. (In Russ.).
7. Ratnikov K. Yu., Molla G. G. Public-private partnership in the development of support zones in the Arctic zone of the Russian Federation // Contentus [Kontentus]. 2020. N 5. P. 129–137. EDN TYBMIN. (In Russ.).
8. A Rating of strategic stability of the complex of large, medium and small businesses in the regions of Russia / Anokhina E. M., Zhigalov V. M., Kuznetsov Yu. V., Melyakova E. V., Mostipan Z. S. Saint Petersburg: LEMA, 2024. (In Russ.).
9. Svadkovsky V. A. Using digital twins to improve operational efficiency in extractive industries // Strategic decisions and risk management [Strategicheskie resheniya i risk-menedzhment]. 2023. Vol. 14, N 3. P. 292–311. EDN HMNFHV. (In Russ.).
10. Smirnov E. N., Lukyanov S. A. Formation and development of the global market of artificial intelligence systems // Regional Economy [Ekonomika regiona]. 2019. Vol. 15, N 1. P. 57–69. EDN MWOTZQ. (In Russ.).
11. Strategic sustainability of enterprises in the regions of Russia: assessment and management: Monograph / Ed. by Yu. V. Kuznetsov. Moscow: Prospect Publishers, 2020. 456 p. (In Russ.).
12. Toktarova V. I., Semenova D. A., Matrosova N. V. Digital projects: essence, characteristics and implementation tools // Vestnik of the Mari State University [Vestnik Mariiskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta]. 2024. Vol. 18. N 1. P. 44.
13. Heininen L. Overview of Arctic Policies and Strategies // Arctic and North [Arktika i Sever]. 2020. N 39. P. 195–202. DOI 10.37482/issn2221-2698.2020.39.195. (In Russ.).
14. Zhang Chi, Myaskov A. V. A Study of the Efficiency of Chinese Gold Mining Enterprises Based on Neural Networks // Economy and management: problems, solutions [Ekonomika i upravlenie: problemy resheniya]. 2024. Vol. 6. N 8 (149). P. 85–92. DOI 10.36871/ek.up.p.r.2024.08.06.008. (In Russ.).
15. Tsvetkov V. A., Dudin M. N., Еrmilina D. A. Managing of the Arctic development: financial support of the region and the criteria choice for evaluating the effectiveness of investment projects // Management Sciences in Russia [Upravlencheskie nauki]. 2019. Vol. 9. N 2. P. 62–77. DOI 10.26794/2404-022X-2019-9-2-62-77. (In Russ.).
16. Economy of the modern Arctic: effective interaction and management of integral risks are the basis of success: monograph / Ed. by V. A. Kryukov, T. P. Skufyina and E. A. Korchar. Apatity : Federal Research Center, Kola Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2020. (In Russ.).
17. Dyllick T., Hockerts K. Beyond the Business Case for Corporate Sustainability // Business Strategy and the Environment. 2002. N 11. Р. 130–141.
18. Reshetnikova M. Innovation and Entrepreneurship in China // European Research Studies Journal. 2018. XXI (3). P. 506–515.
19. Schach M., Madlener R. Impact of an Ice-Free Northeast Passage on LNG Markets and Geopolitics // Energy Police. 2018. Vol. 122. P. 433–448. DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.07.009.
20. Steurer R., Langer M. E., Konrad A., Martinuzzi A. Corporations, Stakeholders and Sustainable Development I: A Theoretical Exploration of Business Society Relations // Journal of Business Ethics. 2005. 61/3. Р. 263–281.
21. Visser W., Matten D., Pohl M., Tolhurst N. The A to Z of Corporate Social Responsibility. London: A John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Publication, 2007.
Review
For citations:
Kuklina E.A. Russia's Arctic Agenda: Projects, Problems, Digital Solutions. Administrative Consulting. 2025;(5):170–186. (In Russ.) EDN: GEOGKY
Views:
9
Email this article 