Exploring Artificial Intelligence Patterns in Digital Innovation: Insights from the Healthcare Sector
EDN: EJZDWN
Abstract
The aim of the study was to identify the key characteristics of digital healthcare innovations to determine optimal strategic approaches for their development. A text corpus of regional digital healthcare practices, selected by the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation and the Central Research Institute of Organization and Informatization of Healthcare (FSBI “RIOIH”) of the Ministry of Health of Russia, was compiled as the empirical basis for the analysis. Using the statistical TF-IDF method to identify semantically significant terms, key patterns characterizing digital healthcare solutions are identified. The predominant role of innovations aimed at organizing primary healthcare is revealed. The most characteristic artificial intelligence technologies in digital healthcare innovations are robotic voice assistants and computer vision technologies. Imperfections in regulatory frameworks concerning the application of medical technologies based on artificial intelligence, the existing digital infrastructure, and issues of ethics and safety in the use of medical data hinder the widespread adoption of innovations. In this regard, strategic approaches to the implementation of artificial intelligence in the context of digital transformation are being defined. The relevance of developing and implementing non-medical digital innovations based on artificial intelligence into the routine processes of medical organizations is demonstrated. The advisability of the widespread use of artificial intelligence in routine innovations to create a holistic data ecosystem necessary for forecasting and strategic decision-making is explained.
About the Authors
N. N. LisitskiiRussian Federation
Nikita N. Lisitskii, PhD student at the Department of Technology Management and Innovation
St. Petersburg
T. G. Maximova
Russian Federation
Tatyana G. Maximova, Doctor of Science (Economics, Technical), Professor at the Faculty of Info-communication Technologies, Professor at the Faculty of Technology Management and Innovation
St. Petersburg
References
1. Golichenko O. G., et al. Formation and evolution of the technology «pickup» model // Journal of Economic Theory [Zhurnal economicheskoy teorii. 2019. Vol. 16. N 3. P. 331–345. DOI 10.31063/2073-6517/2019.16-3.2. EDN OOWLSV. (In Russ.).
2. Egorov M. A. et al. An overview of investments in the development of the russian Medtech market and the prospects for the impact of digitalization in medicine on the economic performance of companies until 2030 // Problems of Social Hygiene, Public Health and History of Medicine [Problemy sotsialnoy gigieny zdravookhraneniia i istorii meditsiny]. 2024. Vol. 32. N S1. P. 588–593. DOI 10.32687/0869-866X-2024-32-s1-588-593. EDN TWUBHA. (In Russ.).
3. Kasukha L., Maksimova T. G., Verzilin D. N. The policy of picking up innovations and digital convergence clubs in Arab countries: results of cluster analysis // Society: Politics, Economics, Law [Obshestvo: politika, economika, pravo]. 2025. N 5. P. 200–209. DOI 10.24158/pep.2025.5.24. EDN TCURJW. (In Russ.).
4. Orlov G. M., Chugunov A. V. Digital Healthcare: A Program-Targeted Approach and Aging Issues // International Journal of Open Information Technologies. 2022. Vol. 10. N 11. P. 113–125. DOI 10.25559/INJOIT.2307-8162.10.202211.113-125. EDN TNZLDB. (In Russ.).
5. Bécue A., Praça I., Gama J. Artificial intelligence, cyber-threats and Industry 4.0: Challenges and opportunities // Artificial intelligence review. 2021. Vol. 54. N 5. P. 3849–3886.
6. Boutellier R., Heinzen M. Trend towards Routine Innovation. In Boutellier R., Heinzen M. (Eds), Growth through Innovation: Managing the Technology-Driven Enterprise. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2013. P. 163–173 DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-04016-5_12.
7. Dai Y. (In press). Studying a Young Generation of AI Natives: Research Access and Sociotechnical Complexity. In Green J., Castanhira M. & Kumpulainen K. (Eds), The Research Handbook on Ethnography In and For Education: Developing Epistemologies of Inquiry in Changing Educational Terrains. Edward Algar Press, 2025.
8. Facilitating the secondary use of health data for public interest purposes across borders, OECD Digital Economy Papers. 2025. N 376, OECD Publishing, Paris. DOI 10.1787/d7b90d15-en.
9. Greenhalgh T., Fahy N., Shaw S. The Bright Elusive Butterfly of Value in Health Technology Development: Comment on «Providing Value to New Health Technology: The Early Contribution of Entrepreneurs, Investors, and Regulatory Agencies» // International Journal of Health Policy and Management. 2018. Vol. 7. N 1. P. 81–85.
10. Hall B. H., Rosenberg N. (ed.). Handbook of the Economics of Innovation. Elsevier, 2010. Vol. 1.
11. Hartschen M., Scherer J., Brügger C. Innovationsmanagement: die 6 Phasen von der Idee zur Umsetzung. GABAL Verlag GmbH, 2009.
12. Henfridsson O. et al. Recombination in the open-ended value landscape of digital innovation // Information and organization. 2018. Vol. 28. N 2. P. 89–100.
13. Hund A. et al. Digital innovation: Review and novel perspective // The Journal of Strategic Information Systems. 2021. Vol. 30. N 4. P. 101695. DOI 10.1016/j.jsis.2021.101695.
14. Kang H., Yu Z., Gong Y. Initializing and growing a database of health information technology (HIT) events by using TF-IDF and biterm topic modeling // AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings. 2018. Vol. 2017. P. 1024.
15. Liu Z. et al. Transforming aged care in China: insights from a TF-IDF-based data mining analysis of national policies (2018–2022) // BMC geriatrics. 2025. Vol. 25. N 1. P. 1–17.
16. Liu Z. Sociological perspectives on artificial intelligence: A typological reading // Sociology Compass. 2021. Vol. 15. N 3. P. e12851.
17. Mirbabaie M. et al. The rise of artificial intelligence understanding the AI identity threat at the workplace // Electronic Markets. 2022. Vol. 32. N 1. P. 73–99.
18. Nambisan S. et al. Digital innovation management // MIS quarterly. 2017. Vol. 41. N 1. P. 223–238.
19. Nelson R. Evolutionary theories of economic change. In Nicita A., Pagano U. (Eds). The evolution of economic diversity. Psychology Press, 2001. P. 197–216.
20. Oslo Manual 2018: Guidelines for Collecting, Reporting and Using Data on Innovation, 4th Edition, The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities. 2018. OECD Publishing, Paris/Eurostat, Luxembourg. DOI doi.org/10.1787/9789264304604-en.
21. Pantic I. V., Mugosa S. Artificial intelligence strategies based on random forests for detection of AI-generated content in public health // Public Health. 2025. Vol. 242. P. 382–387.
22. Starkbaum J. et al. Responsible innovation across societal sectors: a practice perspective on Quadruple Helix collaboration // Journal of Responsible Innovation. 2024. Vol. 11. N 1. P. 2414531.
23. Tække J. Sociological Perspectives on AI, Intelligence and Communication // Systems Research and Behavioral Science. 2025. Vol. 42. N 2. P. 574–584.
24. The innovator’s solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth / M. Raynor, C. Raynor. Harvard Business Review Press, 2013.
25. The political economy of digital monopolies: Contradictions and alternatives to data commodification / P. Bilić, T. Prug. Policy Press, 2021.
Review
For citations:
Lisitskii N.N., Maximova T.G. Exploring Artificial Intelligence Patterns in Digital Innovation: Insights from the Healthcare Sector. Administrative Consulting. 2025;(5):215–226. (In Russ.) EDN: EJZDWN


































