Model of Stakeholder Interaction in Strategizing the High-Tech Industry in the Region (Case of the Coal Chemical Industry of the Kemerovo Region — Kuzbass)
EDN: PHZQAW
Abstract
This article examines one of the important components of the strategic development of the coal chemical industry in the Kemerovo Region — Kuzbass: the development of a model of interaction between stakeholders with different goals. It is proposed to use the methodology of co-construction/cocurrence, where the relations of the parties are more complex compared to competition or cooperation.
The aim is development of a model of stakeholder interaction using the principles of coconstruction/cocurrency in strategizing the development of the coal chemical industry in the Kemerovo region — Kuzbass.
Methods. The study is based on the theory of strategy, the methodology of strategizing by Academician V. L. Kvint, the theory of competition and cooperation by A. Brandenburger, B. Nalebuff. A systemic-structural approach, logical general scientific methods of classification, induction, deduction, abstraction, and systematization is used.
Results. A model of interaction with stakeholders in strategizing the coal chemical industry of the Kemerovo Region — Kuzbass has been developed, which differs from known approaches by the use of principles and mechanisms of strategic co-construction/ cocurrence in conditions of competition in markets of different levels. Specific principles of strategic co-construction/ cocurrence have been proposed, including evidence, dynamism, and balance of interests, integration, openness, and compliance with economic security. Mechanisms of interaction between stakeholders have been defined.
Conclusions. The proposed model of interaction with stakeholders using the principles and mechanisms of strategic co-construction/cocurrence in the conditions of tough global and national competition will significantly increase the likelihood of successful implementation of the strategy for the creation and development of the coal chemical industry in the Kemerovo region — Kuzbass with access to the world level.
About the Author
D. L. Loginov
Kemerovo State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dmitriy L. Loginov, Postgraduate Student of the Department of Regional and Sectoral Development Strategy of the Institute of Economics and Management
Kemerovo
References
1. Abdikeev N. M., Abrosimova O. M. The development of high-tech industries as a locomotive of Russia’s economic growth // Bulletin of the Siberian Institute of Business and Information Technology [Vestnik Sibirskogo instituta biznesa i informatsionnykh tekhnologii]. 2023. Vol. 12, N 3. Р. 46–53. DOI: https://doi.org /: 10.24412/2225-8264-2023-3-46-53 (In Russ.).
2. Baumol U. Microtheory of Innovative Entrepreneurship. Moscow: Gaidar Institute Publishing House, 2013. (In Russ.).
3. Bodrunov S. D. General Theory of Noonomics. Moscow: Cultural Revolution, 2019. (In Russ.).
4. Bodrunov S. D. Technological Progress: Prerequisite and Result of the Socio-Humanitarian Direction of Economic Development // Economic Revival of Russia [Ekonomicheskoe vozrozhdenie Rossii]. 2022. N 1. P. 5–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37930/1990-9780-2022-1-71-5-13. (In Russ.).
5. Kvint V. L. The concept of strategizing. Kemerovo: Kemerovo State University, 2022. 170 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21603/978-5-8353-2562-7. (In Russ.).
6. Kvint V. L. Theoretical basis and methodology of strategizing of the private and public sectors of the Kuzbass region as a medial subsystem of the national economy // Russian Journal of Industrial Economics [Ekonomika promyshlennosti]. 2020. Vol. 13, N 3. P. 290–299. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17073/2072-1633-2020-3-290-299. (In Russ.).
7. Kvint V. L., Khvorostyanaya A. S., Sasaev N. I. Advanced Technologies in Strategizing. Economics and Management [Ekonomika i upravlenie]. 2020. Vol. 26, N 11. P. 1170–1179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35854/1998-1627-2020-11-1170-1179. (In Russ.).
8. Musaev R. A., Pankratov A. A., Astapov K. L., Yandiev M. I. Cluster as an Object of Innovation Infrastructure // Problems of Management Theory and Practice [Problemy teorii i praktiki upravleniya]. 2020. N 11. P. 145–165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46486/0234-4505-2020-11-146-165. (In Russ.).
9. Musaev R. A., Filtsagin R. V. Open Innovation Model as a Strategic Factor in the Technological Development of Companies in the Oil and Gas Industry // Economic Revival of Russia [Ekonomicheskoe vozrozhdenie Rossii]. 2024. N 1. P. 141–149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37930/1990-9780-2024-1-79-141-149. (In Russ.).
10. Myaskov A. V., Alekseev G. F. Strategizing of Transformations in the Coal Mining Industry of Kuzbass // Russian Journal of Industrial Economics [Ekonomika promyshlennosti]. 2020. Vol. 13, N 3. P. 318–327. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17073/2072-1633-2020-3-318-327. (In Russ.).
11. Myaskov A. V., Sevostyanova E. V., Shmelev V. S. The Best Available Technologies as an Efficient Solution for Coal Stevedore Companies // Mining Journal [Gornyi Zhurnal]. 2021. N 2. P. 69–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17580/gzh.2021.02.09. (In Russ.).
12. Nekipelov A. D. The Crisis in Economics — Nature and Ways to Overcome it // Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences [Vestnik rossijskoj akademii nauk]. 2019. Vol. 89, N 1. P. 24–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S0869-587389124-37. (In Russ.).
13. North D. Institutions, Institutional Changes and the Functioning of the Economy. Moscow: Fund of the economic book “Nachala”, 1997.
14. Fadeev A. M., Spiridonov A. A. Strategic Approaches to Ensuring Technological Sovereignty in the Energy Sector // Administrative Consulting [Upravlencheskoe konsul’tirovanie]. 2023. N 9. P. 67–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2023-9-67-80. (In Russ.).
15. Fadeev A. M., Spiridonov A. A. Technological independence and import substitution in the implementation of energy projects in the Arctic // Business magazine “Neftegaz.RU” [Delovoy zhurnal “Neftegaz.RU”]. 2023. N 1. P. 68–73. (In Russ.).
16. Chesbrough G. Open Innovations: Creating Profitable Technologies. Moscow: Pokoleniye, 2007. (In Russ.).
17. Shatskaya I. V., Danilina E. I. Strategic aspects of increasing efficiency of economic activity of industrial enterprises // Russian Journal of Industrial Economics [Ekonomika promyshlennosti]. 2024. Vol. 17, N 2. P. 215–222. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17073/2072-1633-2024-2-1288. (In Russ.).
18. Shatskaya I. V., Kharitonov P. A. Technological development of industrial sectors: problems and prospects // Horizons of Economics [Gorizonty ekonomiki]. 2024. N 3. P. 23–29. (In Russ.).
19. Schumpeter J. A. Theory of Economic Development. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. Moscow: Eksmo, 2008. (In Russ.).
20. Birch D. Job creation in America. New York: Free Press, 1987.
21. Brandenburger A. M., Nalebuff B. J. Co-opetition: A Revolution Mindset that Combines Competition and Cooperation. New York: Doubleday Currency, 1996.
22. Jovanovic B. New technology and the small firm // Small business economics. 2001. Vol. 16, N 1. P. 53–56.
23. Jovanovic B. Selection and the evolution of industry // Econometrica. 1982. Vol. 50, N 3. P. 649–670.
24. Mitcham C. Thinking through technology: the path between engineering and philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2022.
25. Salomon J. What is technology? The issue of its origins and definitions // History and Technology. 1984. Vol. 1, N 2. P. 113–156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07341518408581618.
Review
For citations:
Loginov D.L. Model of Stakeholder Interaction in Strategizing the High-Tech Industry in the Region (Case of the Coal Chemical Industry of the Kemerovo Region — Kuzbass). Administrative Consulting. 2025;(6):96-110. (In Russ.) EDN: PHZQAW
Views:
15
Email this article 