Improving the Political Mechanisms of the CSTO in the Context of Cooperation with International Organizations: Challenges and Adaptation Paths
EDN: QDKVLZ
Abstract
The relevance of this study stems from the need to develop effective models of interorganizational cooperation in the context of the global transformation of security systems and increasing instability in international relations. The CSTO, as a key actor in Eurasian security, is actively advancing its political mechanisms to integrate with international structures and build strategic partnerships aimed at strengthening collective security. The political mechanisms of the CSTO are viewed as a set of institutions, procedures, and instruments that ensure the coordination and implementation of collective decisions by member states in the fields of foreign policy and interorganizational interaction. The development of the CSTO's political mechanisms of interaction with other international and regional organizations is becoming particularly relevant in the context of the transformation of the global security system and increasing instability in neighboring regions.
The aim of this article is to provide a comprehensive assessment of the CSTO’s political mechanisms, identify their strengths and weaknesses, and formulate recommendations for their improvement in light of current challenges.
Materials and methods. The study is based on systemic, institutional, and comparative-legal approaches. The empirical basis includes official CSTO documents, minutes of international meetings, analytical reports, academic journal publications, and open-source data. The case study method is applied to analyze practical examples of the CSTO’s cooperation with international organizations.
Results. The key challenges identified include institutional heterogeneity among member states, bureaucratic barriers, political pressure, and coordination difficulties in a multipolar environment. Successful cooperation cases with the UN, SCO, CIS, and ICRC are examined, demonstrating the Organization’s potential in maintaining regional stability and countering new threats. Strategic directions for improvement are substantiated, including the development of hybrid security tools and the strengthening of peacekeeping capacities.
Conclusions. The adaptation of the CSTO’s political mechanisms is essential for its effectiveness and legitimacy in the international arena. Strengthening the Organization’s position requires systematic updates to its legal framework, enhanced coordination with global actors, and the introduction of innovative tools for responding to contemporary security threats. Recommendations aimed at strengthening institutional cooperation with the UN, modernizing political and legal instruments, integrating hybrid security mechanisms, and expanding the humanitarian dimension constitute the strategic foundation for the CSTO’s future development.
About the Authors
A. P. KhlopkoRussian Federation
Anton P. Khlopko, Applicant
Orel
N. I. Kharitonova
Russian Federation
Natalia I. Kharitonova, Doctor of Political Science, Associate Professor, Chief Researcher of the Faculty of Political Science
Moscow
References
1. Vozzhenikov A. V., Tsybakov D. L. The formation of the CSTO collective security system in a multipolar world // Political Science Issues [Voprosy Politologii]. 2022. Vol. 12, N 5. P. 1525–1533. DOI 10.35775/PSI.2022.81.5.018. EDN WVIUKL (In Russ.).
2. Golub K. Yu. The mechanism of foreign policy coordination within the Collective Security Treaty Organization // Modern Europe [Sovremennaya Evropa]. 2025. N 1 (129). P. 109–120. DOI 10.31857/S0201708325010097. EDN KFNLAO (In Russ.).
3. Guseletov B. P. The post-Soviet space from Europe to Asia: challenges and prospects // A World of Change [Mir Peremen]. 2022. N 4. P. 145–156. DOI 10.51905/2073-3038_2022_4_145. EDN OEPUUD (In Russ.).
4. Davlatzoda R. U. Institutional aspects of the functioning of the SCO: formation and development // Bulletin of the Tajik National University. Series on Socioeconomic and Social Sciences [Vestnik Tadzhikskogo Natsionalnogo Universiteta. Seriya Sotsial’no-Ekonomicheskikh i Obshchestvennykh Nauk]. 2023. N 8. P. 87–92. EDN XFOMHL (In Russ.).
5. Klimenko A. F. The Shanghai Cooperation Organization amid the transformation of the militarypolitical situation in Eastern Eurasia // Military Thought [Voyennaya Mysl]. 2024. N 7. P. 8–20. EDN HWRAZI (In Russ.).
6. Lavrov S. V. In the West, they want to eliminate our country as a serious geopolitical competitor // International Life [Mezhdunarodnaya Zhizn]. 2023. N 8. P. 1–11. EDN NLXLYJ (In Russ.).
7. Mirzazyanov R. Kh. Russia and international organizations in combating global threats of extremism and terrorism // Political Science Issues [Voprosy Politologii]. 2022. Vol. 12, N 5. P. 1598–1604. DOI 10.35775/PSI.2022.81.5.024. EDN IAUACP (In Russ.).
8. Sereda A. A., Bratchik A. S. Multilateral inter-parliamentary cooperation between Russia and the CIS countries: state, problems and prospects // Problems of the Modern Economy [Problemy Sovremennoy Ekonomiki]. 2023. N 3 (87). P. 37–41. EDN ERRDYX (In Russ.).
9. Skriba A. S. Clash of fragments? The impact of world order fragmentation on the revival of bloc rivalry // Current Issues in Europe [Aktualnye Problemy Evropy]. 2024. N 1 (121). P. 42–64. DOI 10.31249/ape/2024.01.03. EDN QTRQGU (In Russ.).
10. Tasmagambetov I. N. CSTO: unwavering priorities in a changing world order // International Life [Mezhdunarodnaya Zhizn]. 2024. N 2. P. 18–27. EDN CFEXTL (In Russ.).
11. Kharitonova N. I. The CSTO and the problem of hybrid warfare // International Life [Mezhdunarodnaya Zhizn]. 2024. N 2. P. 28–37. EDN PWHGEB (In Russ.).
12. Chufrin G. I. The role of the CSTO in ensuring collective security // Federalism [Federalizm]. 2022. Vol. 27, N 3. P. 77–88. EDN BOXKEP (In Russ.).
13. Çakir M., Bakhronov A. Legal status and features of the CSTO as an international regional organization // Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi. 2022. Vol. 12, N 2. P. 723–745. DOI 10.52273/sduhfd..1214415. EDN CNOPSY.
14. Kharitonova N. The CSTO and the problem of hybrid warfare // International Affairs. 2024. Vol. 70, N 2. P. 163–174. DOI 10.21557/iaf.96819202. EDN VAMFUG
15. Sokołowska A. On the role of the collective security treaty organization (CSTO) and ensuring security and support for Armenia as its signatory during the ongoing armed conflict with Azerbaijan // Gubernaculum et Administratio. 2023. Vol. 28, N 2. P. 95–111. DOI 10.16926/gea.2023.02.07. EDN AHCHWF
Review
For citations:
Khlopko A.P., Kharitonova N.I. Improving the Political Mechanisms of the CSTO in the Context of Cooperation with International Organizations: Challenges and Adaptation Paths. Administrative Consulting. 2025;(6):156-168. (In Russ.) EDN: QDKVLZ


































