A Comfortable and Safe Living Environment: The Role of Agglomeration Processes
EDN: VUKBZQ
Abstract
At the current stage of globalization, agglomerations act as the driving forces of the Russian Federation's economy and social development. They are home to over 60% of the Russian Federation's population, approximately 70% of its GDP, as well as finance, innovation, scientific and human resources.
The objective of this study is to examine the role of agglomeration processes in achieving the national goal of “a comfortable and safe living environment”. The research methods used include theoretical generalization and comparison, logical analysis, comparative characteristics, analysis, and synthesis.
The research is based on data from the Federal State Statistics Service. This paper ex amines indicators of a comfortable and safe living environment: housing availability, regional crime rates, and the quality of the urban environment. The author presents the impact of ag glomeration processes on these indicators.
Agglomeration processes are a driver that can either create a severe housing crisis or be come the driving force behind mass affordable housing construction. Agglomeration processes are not a direct cause of increases or decreases in crime, but they create an environment and conditions that can be exploited for both criminal and legal purposes. Effective management will help create a comfortable living environment in the agglomeration.
This study complements the existing body of work examining the effects of agglomeration processes and quality of life.
About the Author
V. V. MelnikovRussian Federation
Vadim V. Melnikov, PhD candidate in the Department of Applied Economics and Economic Security
Belgorod
References
1. Biryulina V. V., Yurasova I. I. Features of agglomeration thinking: domestic and foreign practice // XI International Conference “Russian Regions in the Focus of Change”. 2016. P. 217–226. (In Russ.). 2. Bukhvald E. M. Agglomerations and problems of their legislative regulation // Housing Strategies [Zhilishchnye strategii]. 2021. Vol. 8? N 1. P. 11–26. DOI 10.18334/zhs.8.1.111982. (In Russ.).
2. Weber A. F. Urban growth in the 19th century / translated from English by A. N. Kotelnikov. St. Petersburg: E. D. Kuskova Publishing House? 1903. 464 p. (In Russ.).
3. Kvint V. L., Seredyuk I. V. Strategic assessment of the compliance of open diffuse agglomerations with global, national, and regional trends (using the Kemerovo region — Kuzbass agglomerations as an example) // Industrial Economics [Ekonomika promyshlennosti]. 2025. N 18 (1). Р. 7–23. DOI 10.17073/2072-1633-2025-1-1435 (In Russ.).
4. Kiseleva N. N., Bavina K. V., Karatunov A. V. Methodological approaches to studying the nature of agglomeration processes // Fundamental research [Fundamentalʹnye issledovaniya]. 2016. N 12 (2). P. 422–426. (In Russ.).
5. Kozhevnikov S. A., Voroshilov N. V. Agglomeration processes in the regions of Russia: features and problems of activating positive effects // Economic and social changes: facts, trends, forecast [Ekonomicheskie i sotsialʹnye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz]. 2024. N 17 (1). P. 91–109. DOI 10.15838/esc.2024.1.91.5. (In Russ.).
6. Kolomak E. A. Uneven spatial development in Russia: an explanation of the new economic ge ography // Economic issues [Voprosy ekonomiki]. 2013. N 2. P. 132–150. (In Russ.).
7. Lappo G. M., Polyan P. M., Selivanova T. I. Agglomerations of Russia in the 21st Century // Bulletin of the Irkutsk Region Regional Development Fund [Vestnik Fonda regionalʹnogo razvitiya Irkutskoj oblasti]. 2007. N 1. P. 46. (In Russ.).
8. Malkina M. Yu. Assessing Convergence/Divergence Factors of Russian Regions by Budget Capacity Level Based on Theil-Bernoulli Indices Decomposition // Spatial Economics [Prostranstvennaya ekonomika]. 2016. N 3. P. 16–37. DOI 10.14530/se.2016.3.016-037. (In Russ.).
9. Maloyan G. A. Agglomeration — Urban Development Problems : Monograph. Moscow: Publishing House of the Association of Construction Universities, 2010. 120 p. (In Russ.).
10. Odintsova A. V. Problems of Agglomeration Development in Russia // Federalism [Federalizm]. 2021. Vol. 26. N 2 (102). P. 65–83. DOI 10.21686/2073-1051-2021-2-65-83. (In Russ.).
11. Pivovarov Yu. L. Compression of the “Economic Oikumene of Russia” // World Economy and International Relations [Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya]. 2002. N 4. P. 63–69. (In Russ.).
12. Polyan P. M. Methodology for Identifying and Analyzing the Supporting Framework of Settlement. Part 1. Moscow: Institute of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, 1988. 220 p. (In Russ.).
13. Rastvortseva S. N. Managing the Development of Processes of Concentration of Economic Activity in the Region: Approaches of the New Economic Geography : [monograph]. Moscow: Econ-inform. 2013. 131 p. (In Russ.).
14. Suvorova A. V. Urban Agglomerations: Functioning Features and Methodological Principles of Development // Theoretical and Applied Economics [Teoreticheskaya i prikladnaya ekonomika]. 2023. N 4. P. 1–17. DOI 10.25136/2409-8647.2023.4.68863 E (In Russ.).
15. Suvorova A. V., Kotlyarova S. N. Features of Population and Housing Concentration in the Regions of the Ural Federal District // Municipality: Economics and Management [Munitsipalitet: ekonomika i upravlenie]. 2023. N 4 (45). P. 33–41. DOI 10.22394/2304-3385-2023-4-33-41. (In Russ.).
16. Atkinson A. B. On the measurement of inequality // Journal of Economic Theory. 1970. Vol. 2. P. 244–263.
17. Copus A. K. From core-periphery to polycentric development: concepts of spatial and aspatial peripherality // European Planning Studies. 2001. Vol. 9 (4). Р. 539–552.
18. Eder J. Peripheralization and knowledge bases in Austria: Towards a new regional typology // European Planning Studies. 2019. Vol. 27 (1). Р. 42–67.
19. Florida R. The economic geography of talent // Annals of the Association of American geog raphers. 2002. Vol. 92. N 4. P. 743–755.
20. Gini C. Sulla misura della concentrazione e della variabilità dei caratteri. Atti Del Reale Istituto Veneto Di Scienze, Lettere Ed Arti, LXXVIII (Parte Seconda). 1914. Р. 1203–1248.
21. Han L., Song Y. The method of measuring the agglomeration degree of high-tech industries and its influence mechanism: Taking Guangdong province as an example // Mathematical Problems in Engineering. 2021. Vol. 3. P. 1–14. DOI 10.1155/2021/5585398.
22. Krugman P. Increasing returns and economic geography // Journal of Political Economy. 1991. Vol. 99. P. 483–499.
23. Krugman P., Venables A. J. Integration, specialization, and adjustment // European Economic Review. 1996. Vol. 40. P. 959–467.
24. Lin H. L., Li H. Y., Yang C. H. Agglomeration and productivity: Firm-level evidence from China’s textile industry // China Economic Review. 2011. Vol. 22 (3). P. 313–329.
25. Puga D. The rise and fall of regional inequalities // European Economic Review. 1999. Vol. 43. P. 303–334.
Review
For citations:
Melnikov V.V. A Comfortable and Safe Living Environment: The Role of Agglomeration Processes. Administrative Consulting. 2026;(1):177-192. (In Russ.) EDN: VUKBZQ
JATS XML

































