Standardization as a Condition of Ensuring Quality and Safety of Production in the Uniform Markets of Integration Groups (on the Example of Russia and Other Countries of EEU)
Abstract
Economic integration of Russia with other countries, despite in general successful development, faces a number of obstacles. One of them is insufficient coherence of national systems of technical regulation that generates risks for steady and economically safe development of Russia and the partner countries. In the article the approaches directed to increase in efficiency of cooperation of the countries of he Eurasian Economic Union in standardization, ensuring quality and safety of production in the uniform market are considered.
About the Authors
Elena Anatolyevna Erasova
Saint-Petersburg State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Vladimir Aleksandrovich Plotnikov
Saint-Petersburg State University of Economics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Astankov A. A., Simonov M. A., Chernykh A. K. About forecasting of efficiency of application of innovative technical solutions and technologies for the benefit of safety on transport [O prognozirovanii effektivnosti primeneniya innovatsionnykh tekhnicheskikh reshenii i tekhnologii v interesakh obespecheniya bezopasnosti na transporte] // Bulletin of the St. Petersburg University of State Fire Service of The Ministry of the Russian Federation for Civil Defense, Emergencies and Elimination of Consequences of Natural Disasters [Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta Gosudarstvennoi protivopozharnoi sluzhby MChS Rossii]. 2015. No. 3. P. 25–31. (rus)
2. Vertakova Yu.V., Kulikov M. V. Interstate economic cooperation of Russia in the conditions of extension of economic sanctions and restrictions [Mezhgosudarstvennoe ekonomicheskoe sotrudnichestvo Rossii v usloviyakh rasshireniya ekonomicheskikh sanktsii i ogranichenii] // News of Southwest State University. Series: Economy. Sociology. Management [Izvestiya YugoZapadnogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika. Sotsiologiya. Menedzhment]. 2014. N 3. P. 11–19. (rus)
3. Gryzunov V.V., Pekarchuk D.S. Victimity of technical safety on hazardous production facilities of the mining industry [Viktimnost’ tekhnicheskoi bezopasnosti na opasnykh proizvodstvennykh ob”ektakh gornodobyvayushchei promyshlennosti] // Modern scientific research: methodology, theory, practice: materials of the VIII International scientific and practical conference [Sovremennye nauchnye issledovaniya: metodologiya, teoriya, praktika: materialy VIII Mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoprakticheskoi konferentsii] (Krasnoyarsk, on July 27, 2015). Krasnoyarsk: Publishing Centre “Inspire”, 2015. P. 161–167. (rus)
4. Davydov S. L. Integration of regions of Russia into global economic system: economy sociologist’s look [Integratsiya regionov Rossii v global’nuyu khozyaistvennuyu sistemu: vzglyad ekonom-sotsiologa] //Theory and practice of service: economy, social sphere, technologies [Teoriya i praktika servisa: ekonomika, sotsial’naya sfera, tekhnologii]. 2014. N 2 (20). P. 22–27. (rus)
5. Daniyelyan A. A. Russian-Armenian industrial integration: assessment of a state and prospect of development [Rossiisko-armyanskaya promyshlennaya integratsiya: otsenka sostoyaniya i perspektivy razvitiya] // News of the St. Petersburg State University of Economics [Izvestiya Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta]. 2015. N 2 (92). P. 88–90. (rus)
6. Eurasian political economy. The textbook for higher education institutions [Evraziiskaya politekonomiya. Uchebnik dlya vuzov]. SPb.: Publishing house of the St. Petersburg State University of Economics [Izd-vo SPbGEU], 2016. 750 p. (rus)
7. Erasova E. A. Russian practice of technical regulation: problems and strategic decisions [Rossiiskaya praktika tekhnicheskogo regulirovaniya: problemy i strategicheskie resheniya] // Bulletin of the St. Petersburg University. Series 5. Economy [Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Ser. 5. Ekonomika]. 2006. N 1. P. 31–40. (rus)
8. Litvinenko A. N., Maksimova O.Yu. Resources of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia in system of ensuring economic security of the country [Resursy MVD Rossii v sisteme obespecheniya ekonomicheskoi bezopasnosti strany] // Economic sciences [Ekonomicheskie nauki]. 2010. N 69. P. 184–192. (rus)
9. Mieryin L. A., Glazman G. L. Integration of Russia into global innovative space: conceptual and administrative approach [Integratsiya Rossii v global’noe innovatsionnoe prostranstvo: kontseptual’no-upravlencheskii podkhod] // Theory and practice of service: economy, social sphere, technologies [Teoriya i praktika servisa: ekonomika, sotsial’naya sfera, tekhnologii]. 2015. N 1 (23). P. 10–14. (rus)
10. Myasnikovich M. V. Integration problems: political, legal, economic aspects [Problemy integratsii: politicheskie, pravovye, ekonomicheskie aspekty] // News of the St. Petersburg State University of Economics [Izvestiya Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta]. 2015. N 5. P. 10–16. (rus)
11. Falinsky I. Yu. System of monitoring of a regional shadow product [Sistema monitoringa regional’nogo tenevogo produkta] // Audit and financial analysis [Audit i finansovyi analiz]. 2015. N 5. P. 434–438. (rus)
12. Ecological and industrial safety at development of mineral deposits of the Member Nations of the CIS [Ekologicheskaya i promyshlennaya bezopasnost’ pri osvoenii mestorozhdenii poleznykh iskopaemykh gosudarstv — uchastnikov SNG] / Executive committee of the CIS [Ispolnitel’nyi komitet SNG]. M., 2014. 42 p. (rus)
Review
For citations:
Erasova E.A., Plotnikov V.A. Standardization as a Condition of Ensuring Quality and Safety of Production in the Uniform Markets of Integration Groups (on the Example of Russia and Other Countries of EEU). Administrative Consulting. 2016;(8):37-43. (In Russ.)
Views:
347
Email this article 