Preview

Administrative Consulting

Advanced search

EU Macroeconomic Policy Reforms under Influence of Eurozone Crisis

Abstract

This article is devoted to major measures undertaken in order to reform the EU macroeconomic policy as a result of Eurozone crisis. It is a highly crucial issue for academic research due to multiple problems that occurred in the Eurozone states as a result of the 2008 world financial crisis. It is also an interesting issue for research because of the EU’s activities targeted at insuring efficiency of the EU institutions and support of problematic member states. Research objective of this article is examination of the Eurozone crisis influence on the evolution of institutional aspects of the EU macroeconomic policy. The methodological basis of this research is composed of positive economics, comparative analysis, structural and functional analysis, and theoretical aspects of rational choice institutionalism. As a result of the research, it was demonstrated that internal debates within the EU had negative impact of the Eurozone crisis, institutional reforms undertaken to solve the crisis were not finalized, but eventually the European Union managed to find solutions to solve the EMU problems in the context of macroeconomic harmonization. The practical importance of this article is determined by evaluation of the current Eurozone situation and efficiency of institutional reforms.

About the Authors

Dmitri Sergeevich Evstafiev

Russian Federation


Natalia Genrikhovna Zaslavskaya
Saint-Petersburg State University
Russian Federation


References

1. Заславская Н. Г. Институциональные аспекты финансового кризиса в Еврозоне // Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Сер. 6. Политология. Международные отношения. 2013. № 3. С. 129-133.

2. Заславская Н. Г. Эволюция институционального баланса в ЕС в контексте европейской интеграции // Клио. 2015. № 3 (99). C. 155-160.

3. Косов Ю. В. Взаимосвязь энергетической и экологической безопасности в условиях современного мирового экономического кризиса // Управленческое консультирование. 2011. № 2 (42). С. 87-95.

4. Ткаченко С. Л. Теория внешних воздействий и европейская валютная интеграция // Проблемы современной экономики. 2009. № 3. С. 203-205.

5. Barber T. Greece condemned for falsifying data // Financial Times. Jan 12. 2010 [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/33b0a48c-ff7e-11de-8f53-00144feabdc0.html (дата обращения: 15.09.2016).

6. Frankel J.A., Saravelos G. Are leading indicators of financial crises useful for assessing country vulnerability? Evidence from 2008-09 global crisis // National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 16047 [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://www.nber.org/papers/w16047 (дата обращения: 15.09.2016).

7. Lane P. R. The European Sovereign Debt Crisis // Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2012. Vol. 26 (3). P. 49-68.

8. Moravcsik A. Europe After the Crisis: How to Sustain a Common Currency // Foreign Affairs. 2012. Vol. 91 (3). P. 54-68.

9. Panico C. The Causes of the Debt Crisis in Europe and the Role of Regional Integration // Political Economy Research Institute, University of Massachussets Amherst. Workingpaper series 234. September. 2010 [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/ download?doi=10.1.1.401.3744&rep=rep1&type=pdf (дата обращения: 15.09.2016).

10. Ruffert M. The European Debt Crisis and European Union Law // Common Market Law Review. 2011. Vol. 48. P. 1777-1806 [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://robertgrzeszczak.bio.wpia. uw.edu.pl/files/2013/03/THE-EUROPEAN-DEBT-CRISISAND-EUROPEAN-UNION-LAW.pdf (дата обращения: 15.09.2016).


Review

For citations:


Evstafiev D.S., Zaslavskaya N.G. EU Macroeconomic Policy Reforms under Influence of Eurozone Crisis. Administrative Consulting. 2017;(1):91-102. (In Russ.)

Views: 436


ISSN 1726-1139 (Print)
ISSN 1816-8590 (Online)