Models of Bureaucracy Management Taking Into Account the Economic Development of Regions
https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2017-5-79-95
Abstract
We found out that the number of subjects of management does not have a significant impact on the dynamics of civil service development. The indices of the SED and the development of the civil service of the republics are changing in a contradictory dynamics, and the development of the civil service at the federal and regional levels is not coordinated. We offer the statement that the existence the system of a civil service management, in which its governing bodies are administered by both the head and the government of the region, is accompanied in a significant proportion of the cases by positive changes in the civil service system against the backdrop of the steady growth of the SED indices. It is in contrast to the regions where the civil service management is fully concentrated in the hands of the head of republic. Thus, the civil service management system is closely related to the organization of political power. We examined the management system against the backdrop of the dynamics of quantitative indicators of the civil service development and dynamics of the region’s SED. For the first time we systematized the management bodies of the civil service of the republics within the Russian Federation and compared their functions. Increasing the efficiency of the civil service is an urgent task for all regions and the country as awhole, therefore, the increment of scientific knowledge of the factors influencing the functioning and management of this institution has not only theoretical but also wide practical application.
About the Author
George Aleksandrovich Borshevskiy
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Antoshina N. M. Realization in subjects of the Russian Federation legislation on state service [Realizatsiya v sub”ektakh Rossiiskoi Federatsii zakonodatel’stva o gosudarstvennoi sluzhbe] // Public administration [Gosudarstvennaya sluzhba]. 2014. N 4 (90). P. 36–38. (rus)
2. Atamanchuk G. V. About contents and a form of state service [O soderzhanii i forme gosudarstvennoi sluzhby] // Materials of the All-Russian scientific and practical conference [Materialy Vserossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii] / under the editorship of A. I. Turchynov. M. : RAGS, 2005. P. 80–89. (rus)
3. Barabashev A. G., Prokofiev V. N. Creation of body for state service management, as instrument of unification of legal regulation of types and levels of state service [Sozdanie organa po upravleniyu gosudarstvennoi sluzhboi, kak instrumenta unifikatsii pravovogo regulirovaniya vidov i urovnei gosudarstvennoi sluzhby] // Questions of the public and municipal management [Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i munitsipal’nogo upravleniya]. 2015. N 2. P. 7–28. (rus)
4. Borschevsky G A. Application of quantitative methods for a research of processes of reforming of state service [Primenenie kolichestvennykh metodov dlya issledovaniya protsessov reformirovaniya gosudarstvennoi sluzhby] // Questions of the public and municipal management [Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i munitsipal’nogo upravleniya]. 2015. N 2. P. 147–172. (rus)
5. Kushlin V. I., Ustenko V.S. Reforming of state service as a factor of management of social and economic development (experience of the developed countries) [Reformirovanie gosudarstvennoi sluzhby kak faktor upravleniya sotsial’no-ekonomicheskim razvitiem (opyt razvitykh stran)] // Modern technologies of management [Sovremennye tekhnologii upravleniya]. 2015. N 5 (53). P. 42–47. (rus)
6. Mamichev N. G. Social mechanisms of management of the state civil service of the subject of the Russian Federation [Sotsial’nye mekhanizmy upravleniya gosudarstvennoi grazhdanskoi sluzhboi sub”ekta Rossiiskoi Federatsii]: dissertation. M. : RAGS, 2011. 175 p. (rus)
7. Nechiporenko V.S. Theory and organization of state service [Teoriya i organizatsiya gosudarstvennoi sluzhby]: Course of lectures. M. : RAGS publishing house, 2008. 275 p. (rus)
8. Ovcharenko R.K. Formation of a control system of the state civil service of the territorial subject of the Russian Federation [Stanovlenie sistemy upravleniya gosudarstvennoi grazhdanskoi sluzhboi sub”ekta RF] // Power [Vlast’]. 2012. N 1. P. 45–48. (rus)
9. Turchynov A. I. Subject of management of state service of Russia: formation problems [Sub”ekt upravleniya gosudarstvennoi sluzhboi Rossii: problemy formirovaniya] // Public administration [Gosudarstvennaya sluzhba]. 2004. N 1 (27). P. 14–19. (rus)
10. Cherepanov V. V. Bases of state service and personnel policy [Osnovy gosudarstvennoi sluzhby i kadrovoi politiki] / 2nd edition. M. : Unity, 2014. 214 p. (rus)
11. Barabashev A. G., Klimenko A. V. Russian Government Changes and Performance // ChineesePolotical Science Review. 2017. Vol. 2, N 1. P. 22–39.
12. Elling R., Thompson L. Human Resource Problems and State Management Performance across Two Decades: The Implications for civil Service Reform // Review of Public Personnel Administration. 2006. N 26. Vol. 4. P. 302–334.
13. Fernandez S., Resh W. G., Moldogaziev T., Oberfield Z. W. Assessing the Past and Promise of the Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey for Public Management Research: A Research Synthesis // Public Administration Review. 2015. Vol. 75. Iss. 3. Р. 382–394.
14. Tatham M., Bauer M. W. The State, the Economy, and the Regions: Theories of Preference Formation in Times of Crisis // Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 2016. Vol. 26. N 4. Р. 631–646.
Review
For citations:
Borshevskiy G.A. Models of Bureaucracy Management Taking Into Account the Economic Development of Regions. Administrative Consulting. 2017;(5):79-95. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2017-5-79-95
Views:
476
Email this article 