Political Mobilization or Political Modernization? State Cultural Policy and Use of a Gender Resource of State Policy and Management
https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2017-11-8-16
Abstract
The authors consider the usage of gender resource in the processes of political modernization and political mobilization in Russia. They conduct a comparative analysis of these processes from the point of view of their beneficiaries. The authors prove that the story of «Sveta from Ivanovo» is a good example of successful mobilization of conservative gender resource using web-technologies. It is argued the importance of the state cultural policy in the formation of modern gender relations and the authors show that modern Russian state cultural policy is aimed mostly at the conservative political mobilization. This reduces the efficiency of the use of gender resource in public administration
About the Authors
Lev Evgenievich Vostriakov
Saint-Petersburg State University of Culture
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Marina Aleksandrovna Kashina
North-West Institute of Management, Branch of RANEPA
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Achkasova V.A. Features of modern propaganda methods in mobilization processes [Osobennosti sovremennykh propagandistskikh metodov v mobilizatsionnykh protsessakh] // Strategic communications in business and policy [Strategicheskie kommunikatsii v biznese i politike]. 2015. V. 1. N 1. P. 77–80. (rus)
2. Vostryakov L. E. State cultural policy: concepts and models [Gosudarstvennaya kul’turnaya politika: ponyatiya i modeli]. SPb. : NWIM of RANEPA publishing house [Izd-vo SZIU RANKhiGS], 2011. (rus)
3. Dragichevich-Sheshich M., Stoykovich B. Culture: management, animation, marketing [Kul’tura: menedzhment, animatsiya, marketing]. Novosibirsk : Publishing house Tigra, 2000. (rus)
4. Kashina M. A. Use of a gender resource of development as a social innovation in public administration [Ispol’zovanie gendernogo resursa razvitiya kak sotsial’naya innovatsiya v gosudarstvennom upravlenii] // Administrative consulting [Upravlencheskoe konsul’tirovanie]. 2013. N 12. P. 84–91. (rus)
5. Kosyakova Yu., Kurakin D. Whether institutes matter? A professional gender segregation at a stage of entry into the market of work in the Soviet and Post-Soviet Russia [Imeyut li znachenie instituty? Professional’naya gendernaya segregatsiya na etape vykhoda na rynok truda v sovetskoi i postsovetskoi Rossii] // Journal of Sociology and social anthropology [Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsial’noi antropologii]. 2016. V. XIX. N 5 (88). P. 127–145. (rus)
6. Ryabov O. V. “Sveta from Ivanovo” as mirror of Bolotnaya Square of revolution [«Sveta iz Ivanovo» kak zerkalo Bolotnoi revolyutsii] // Labyrinth. Journal of Social and humanitarian researches [Labirint. Zhurnal sotsial’no-gumanitarnykh issledovanii]. 2013. N 5. P. 125–147. (rus)
7. Solovyov A. I. State as producer of policy [Gosudarstvo kak proizvoditel’ politiki] // Political Researches [Polis]. 2016. N 2. P. 90–108. (rus)
8. Shabrov O. F. Political modernization of Russia: points of consent and discussion [Politicheskaya modernizatsiya Rossii: tochki soglasiya i diskussii] // Modernization and political development of Russia: collection of scientific articles [Modernizatsiya i politicheskoe razvitie Rossii]. M., 2012. P. 5–16. (rus)
Review
For citations:
Vostriakov L.E., Kashina M.A. Political Mobilization or Political Modernization? State Cultural Policy and Use of a Gender Resource of State Policy and Management. Administrative Consulting. 2017;(11):8-16. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2017-11-8-16
Views:
729
Email this article 