Role and Functions of Experts in the Process of Governmental Decision Making
https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2017-6-8-15
Abstract
Paper is devoted to analysis of functions of expert knowledge during of decision-making process and of the regimes ‘expert-power’. We propose to stress two main functions of expert knowledge - instrumental, when governmental officials really interested of expert’s opinion for concrete problems, and symbolic, when experts must legitimize some decisions adopted previously. Paper based at the preliminary results of research, which includes near to ten expert interview in Moscow and St. Petersburg. According to preliminary conclusion of research the relationship between functions of expert knowledge changes during process of decision making: instrumental function used at the stages of problem’s identification and discussions of possible ways of its decision more frequently. Symbolic function used frequently with the purpose of public opinion creation, supporting of adopted decisions.
About the Author
Alexander Yurievich Sungurov
National Research University Higher School of Economics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Analytical communities in public policy: global phenomenon and Russian practices [Analiticheskie soobshchestva v publichnoi politike: global’nyi fenomen i rossiiskie praktiki] / Editorial board.: N.Yu. Belyaeva (ex. ed.), Sh.Sh. Kakabadze, D. G. Zaytsev. M. : Russian Association of Political Science (RAPS); Russian political encyclopedia (ROSSPEN) [Rossiiskaya assotsiatsiya politicheskoi nauki (RAPN); Rossiiskaya politicheskaya entsiklopediya (ROSSPEN)], 2012. (rus)
2. Elensky A. V. Political expertise: genesis, concept and cognitive opportunities [Politicheskaya ekspertiza: genezis, ponyatie i kognitivnye vozmozhnosti] // Questions of philosophy [Voprosy filosofii]. 2011. N 2. P. 57–70. (rus)
3. Karyagin M. E., Sungurov A.Yu. Modern Russian politological community — the first steps to the analysis [Sovremennoe rossiiskoe politologicheskoe soobshchestvo — pervye shagi k analizu] // Political research [Polis]. 2016. N 2. P. 8–20. (rus)
4. Kosolapov N. Policy, expertise, society: interdependence knots [Politika, ekspertiza, obshchestvo: uzly vzaimozavisimosti] // Pro et Contra, 2003. V. 8, N 2. P. 18–31. (rus)
5. Makarychev A.S. States, expert communities and modes of knowledge power [Gosudarstva, ekspertnye soobshchestva i rezhimy znaniya-vlasti] // Political science [Politicheskaya nauka]. 2015. N 3. P. 9–26. (rus)
6. Patzelt W. J. Methods of political science [Metody politicheskoi nauki] // Methodical approaches of a politological research and metatheoretical bases of the political theory. Commented introduction [Metodicheskie podkhody politologicheskogo issledovaniya i metateoreticheskie osnovy politicheskoi teorii. Kommentirovannoe vvedenie]. M. : ROSSPEN, 2004. P. 133–165. (rus)
7. Sungurov A. Yu., Karyagin M. E. Russian expert community and power: main forms of interaction [Rossiiskoe ekspertnoe soobshchestvo i vlast’: osnovnye formy vzaimodeistviya] // Political research [Polis]. 2017. N 3. P. 144–159. (rus)
8. Sungurov A. Yu., Tinyakov D. K. Administrative reform and its projects in modern Russia: whether there were coalitions of support? [Administrativnaya reforma i ee proekty v sovremennoi Rossii: byli li koalitsii podderzhki?] // Social sciences and present [Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’]. 2016. N 2. P. 39–51. (rus)
9. Boswell С. The political functions of expert knowledge: Knowledge and legitimation in European Union Immigration Policy // Journal of European Public Policy. 2008. V. 15, N 4. P. 4721–4788.
10. Hunter A., Boswell C. Comparing the Political Functions of Independent Commissions: the Case of UK Migrant Integration Policy // Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 2015. V. 17, N 1. P. 10–25.
11. The Politics of Scientific Advice: Institutional Design for Quality Assurance / Ed. by J. Lentsch, P. Weingart. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2011.
Review
For citations:
Sungurov A.Yu. Role and Functions of Experts in the Process of Governmental Decision Making. Administrative Consulting. 2017;(6):8-15. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2017-6-8-15
Views:
738
Email this article 