Preview

Administrative Consulting

Advanced search

To the Question about the Dynamics of the Processes of Interaction «Voters — the Media»

https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2018-4-142-149

Abstract

This article explores the problem addressing the problem of the dynamics of the processes of influencing voters’ audience from a  variety of sources, including television, network and print media. Any theory, in whatever sphere of human being it exists, performs three  important functions: description, explanation, prediction. The same  applies to theories that reveal the essence of ways and means of  political communications. The paper considers three main  sociological methodologies for assessing the role of the media in the  process of influencing voter audiences. The author determined that  in connection with the globalization and technological progress that has taken place, the traditional media lost the monopoly on  information, and, in fact, ceased to be the «fourth power», and  voters largely independently determine media content. The  interaction of traditional television and print media (very often  administratively managed) with the decentralized network helps to  form a political agenda. Traditional media identify specific public  inquiries generated in online communities, and hand them over to the «pper» levels of government.

About the Author

S. A. Malinina
Interparliamentary Assembly of Member Nations of the Commonwealth of Independent States
Russian Federation

Chief, Press Service of the Secretariat of the Interparliamentary Assembly of Member Nations of the Commonwealth of  Independent States, Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation



References

1. Condry, J. The Psychology of Television. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers. Hillsdale, New Jersey, Hove and London. 1989. 344 p.

2. Lazarsfeld, Paul F., Bernard B., Hazel G. The People’s Choice: How the Voter Makes Up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign. (Second edition.) P. xxxiii, 178. New York: Columbia University Press, 1948.

3. Littlejohn, S. W. Theories of Human Communication (6th ed.). Albuquerque, NM: Wadsworth Publishing. 1999. P. 351–354.

4. Pratkanis, A. R. Altercasting as an influence tactic. In D. J. Terry & M A. Hagg (eds.), Attitudes, Behaviour and Social Context: The Role of Norms and Group Membership. Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Earlbaum Ass. 2000. P. 201–226.

5. Shoemaker, Pamela J., Vos, Timothy P. Gatekeeping Theory. New York: Routledge, 2009.

6. Silverstone, R., Haddon, L. (1996). Design and the domestication of information and ommunication technologies: technical change and everyday life. In: Mansell, Robin and Silverstone, Roger, (eds.) Communication by Design: The Politics of Information and Communication Technologies.

7. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, P. 44–74.

8. Wolff, M. Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White HouseFire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House. PROLOGUE: AILES AND BANNON. Published January 5th 2018 by Henry Holt and Co. Hardcover.


Review

For citations:


Malinina S.A. To the Question about the Dynamics of the Processes of Interaction «Voters — the Media». Administrative Consulting. 2018;(4):142-149. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2018-4-142-149

Views: 438


ISSN 1726-1139 (Print)
ISSN 1816-8590 (Online)