The Ideological Component of the Concept “Power State”
https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2018-10-143-152
Abstract
The author of the article makes an attempt to determine the role of the ideological component in the unfolding scientific discussion in the context of the conceptualization of a power state from the political standpoint. Using the methods of discourse analysis and comparative approach, he substantiates the conclusions that the large-scale pluralism of interpretations of a power state as a public phenomenon within the framework of socio-political discourse is due, first of all, to the ideological positions of the authors. Secondly, the ideological differences of reasoning in favor of a power state conceal the danger of deviating from the discussion of a power state in the politicalmanipulative side in favor of the existing socio-political status quo; Finally, thirdly, the concentration of the expert-scientific community and the public on ideological differences over a power state is hampered by an objective scientific analysis of the foundations and effectiveness of a modern power state in modern conditions.
About the Author
L. P. Belov
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (North-West Institute of Management of RANEPA);
LLC “Gelios”
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Leonid P. Belov, LLC “Gelios”, CEO, Graduate student of North-West Institute of Management of RANEPA
Saint-Petersburg
References
1. Abramova M. G. Mythologema of the strong state and relevant problems of state policy of Russia // MSU Bulletin. Series 12. Political sciences [Vestnik MGU. Ser. 12. Politicheskie nauki]. 2014. N 3. P. 97. (In rus)
2. Avakyan S. A. Some thoughts on a state and prospects of constitutional and political development of Russia // Bulletin of the Moscow university. Series 11. Law [Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Ser. 11. Pravo]. 2016. N 1. P. 3–17. (In rus)
3. Alexandrov V. B. Russian social philosophical thought: subjects, ideas, traditions: monograph. Second edition. SPb. : NWIM of RANEPA, 2017. (In rus)
4. Aronson O. Forces of false. Experiences of non-political democracy. M. : Falanster, 2017. (In rus)
5. Bayzakova K. I. The concept of “the strong state” of Michel Debre and a problem of the constitutional reform in France in the 40–50th years of the 20th century: dissertation abstract. Tashkent, 1985. (In rus)
6. Belevskaya Yu.Yu. Maintenance of the concept “strong state” // Social and humanitarian knowledge [Sotsial’no-gumanitarnye znaniya]. 2011. N 8. P. 293–297. (In rus)
7. Berdin A. T. Traditionalism as ideology of an alternative to nationalism // Sociology. Economy. Policy [Sotsiologiya. Ekonomika. Politika]. 2015. N 4. P. 66–68. (In rus)
8. Bernatsky G. G. State ideology and strong state: history and present // Topical issues of development of the Russian statehood and public law [Aktual’nye voprosy razvitiya rossiiskoi gosudarstvennosti i publichnogo prava]. Materials of the II scientific and practical conference / Editor-in-chief E. V. Trofimov. 2016. P. 14–20. (In rus)
9. Bernatsky G. G. The strong state is impossible without ideology // Scientific notes of law department [Uchenye zapiski yuridicheskogo fakul’teta]. 2013. N 31 (41). P. 9a–13. (In rus)
10. Vasilyev A. V. State: historical and modern aspects of understanding: lecture. M. : RAGS publishing house, 2006. 47 p. (In rus)
11. Vatyl V. N., Vatyl N. V. State ideal: conceptual model of N. N. Alekseev // POLITEX. 2017. V. 13, N 2. P. 43–52. (In rus)
12. Vatyl V. N., Vatyl N. V. Strong and effective state: conceptual model of I. A. Ilyin // POLITEX. 2014. V. 10, N 4. P. 110–133. (In rus)
13. Power and policy: institutional calls of the 21st century. Political science. Year-book 2012 / Russian association of political science / chief editor A. I. Solovyov. M. : ROSSPEN, 2012. (In rus)
14. Gadzhiev K. S. Russian Federation: national state or state of the people? // Political Researches [Polis]. 2018. N 3. P. 130–146. (In rus)
15. Gobozov I. A. State and national identity: Globalization or internationalization? M. : URSS, 2014. 198 p. (In rus)
16. State and law: current state, prospects of development // State and law [Gosudarstvo i pravo]. 2017. N 2. P. 111–117.
17. Grishnova E. E. Political liberalism in Russia: history lessons // Social and political sciences [Sotsial’no-politicheskie nauki]. 2016. N 3. P. 63–67. (In rus)
18. Gutorov V. A. About some aspects of formation of a political and philosophical discourse in modern Russia // POLITEX-. 2016. V. 12. N 1. P. 4–28. (In rus)
19. Gutorov V. A. To a question of origin of the state: paradoxes and anomalies of modern interpretations // Political Researches [Polis]. 2014. N 3. P. 91–110. (In rus)
20. Evgenyeva T. V., Seleznyova A. V. The Soviet past in valuable and figurative and symbolical space of the Russian identity // Political Researches [Polis]. 2016. N 3. P. 25–39. (In rus)
21. Zhuravlev D. V. A problem of updating of valuable reference points in hybrid democracies: Russian example // Messenger PFUR, Political science series [Vestnik RUDN, seriya Politologiya]. 2016. N 3. P. 116–124. (In rus)
22. Zarubina N. N. Historical memory as source of knowledge of civilization specifics of Russia // Social sciences and present [Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’]. 2017. N 2. P. 52–64. (In rus)
23. Zatonsky V. A. On a question of the value of the state and the legal regulation which is carried out by it: personal and social aspects // Current problems of jurisprudence [Aktual’nye problemy pravovedeniya]. 2004. N 1. P. 69–75. (In rus)
24. Kerimov A. D. Strong state: answer to a call of a modern era. M. : Nota Bene, 2009. (In rus)
25. Kerimov A. D. The strong state as the defining factor of social progress: monograph / A. D. Kerimov, I. N. Kuksin. M. : Norm: INFRA-M, 2018. (In rus)
26. Kovalenko V. I. General historical imperatives of social development and the requirement of domestic tradition in political process of Russia // Political science [Politicheskaya nauka]. 2009. N 1. P. 89–107. (In rus)
27. Kolesnikov V. N. National representation and parliamentarism in the history of a political thought of Russia. SPb. : SZAGS publishing house, 2006. (In rus)
28. Kondrashov P. Russia in search of utopias. Whether return to morals policy is possible? // Free thought [Svobodnaya mysl’]. 2015. N 4. P. 194–207. (In rus)
29. Levinson A. Where to go by “a special way”? // NZ [Neprikosnovennyi zapas]. 2018. N 1 (117). P. 238–241. (In rus)
30. Linetsky A. I. Moment of truth: traditionalist stereotypes in the Russian policy // Political Researches [Polis]. 2018. N 1. P. 62–79. (In rus)
31. Linetsky A. I. Russian idea of Alexander Yanov // Political Researches [Polis]. 2015. N 6. P. 173–187. (In rus)
32. Lichman B. V. World outlook interpretations of history of Russia and relation to them of the state // Social and political sciences [Sotsial’no-politicheskie nauki]. 2015. N 4. P. 34–39. (In rus)
33. Lyubashits V. Ya., Razuvaev N. V. Evolution of the state: historical dynamics and theoretical model: monograph. M. : RIOR: INFRA-M, 2018. (In rus)
34. Marchenkova N. P. Sociocultural and political ideas of the strong state of the Russian jurist and the thinker N. V. Ustryalov // Person, image, word in the context of historical time and space [Chelovek, obraz, slovo v kontekste istoricheskogo vremeni i prostranstva]: materials of the Russian scientific and practical conference. M, 2015. P. 253–257. (In rus)
35. National idea of Russia. In the 6 v. M. : Center of the problem analysis and state and administrative design, Scientific expert, 2012. 4439 p. (In rus)
36. Nemirovsky V. G. The injured society and its phantoms // Political Researches [Polis]. 2015. N 3. P. 185–189. (In rus)
37. Obolonsky A. V. On a mythologema of “special way” // Social sciences [Obshchestvennye nauki]. 2017. N 6. P. 77–82. (In rus)
38. Petrov K. E. Domination of conceptual polysemy: the strong state in the Russian political discourse // Political Researches [Polis]. 2006. N 3. P. 159–183. (In rus)
39. Ponkin I. V. Theory of public management: the textbook for a magistracy and programs Master of Public Administration / Institute of Public Administration and Civil Service of RANEPA. M. : BukiVedi, 2017. (In rus)
40. Putin V. V. Capstone of the Russian statehood. (“Collection of Izborsky club”). M. : Izborsky club, Book world, 2014. 288 p.
41. Pushkareva G. V. Ideas and values as way of designing of symbolical space of national identity // Political Researches [Polis]. 2017. N 5. P. 156–173. (In rus)
42. Russia in search of ideologies: transformation of valuable regulators of modern societies / under the editorship of V. S. Martyanov, L. G. Fishman. M. : Political encyclopedia, 2016. 334 p. (In rus)
43. Sapko I. V. The concept of the strong state in the political theory of E. V. Tarle // Power [Vlast’]. 2012. N 6. P. 86–89. (In rus)
44. Solonevich I. L. National monarchy. M. : RIMIS, 2005. (In rus)
45. Timofeev M. S. I. A. Ilyin’s ideas about the strong state // History of state and law [Istoriya gosudarstva i prava]. 2013. N 22. P. 28–31. (In rus)
46. Timofeev M. S. N. Ya. Danilevsky and civilization bases of the strong Russian state // Messenger of the Russian University of cooperation [Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta kooperatsii]. 2015. N 3 (21). P. 125–129. (In rus)
47. Fedorova E. V. A problem of nationalism and patriotism in I. A. Ilyin’s creativity and its relevance in modern Russia // Bulletin of the Moscow University. Series 18. Sociology and political science [Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Ser. 18. Sotsiologiya i politologiya]. 2015. N 4. P. 210– 219. (In rus)
48. Fukuyama F. State-Building: Governance and World Order in the 21st century / translation from English O. E. Kolesnikov, etc. under a general edition of O. E. Kolesnikov. M. : AST: Keeper, 2007. (In rus)
49. Shchipkov N. A. Myth space during a post-secular era // Free thought [Svobodnaya mysl’]. 2018. N 2. P. 45–52. (In rus)
50. Yakovenko I. G. Russian State: national interests, borders, prospects / I. G. Yakovenko; D. S. Likhachev Heritage institute. the 2nd edition. M. : New Chronograph, 2008. 319 p. (In rus)
51. Yakunin V. I. State ideology and national idea: constitutional approach // Power [Vlast’]. 2007. N 3. P. 3–12. (In rus)
Review
For citations:
Belov L.P. The Ideological Component of the Concept “Power State”. Administrative Consulting. 2018;(10):143-152. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2018-10-143-152
Views:
757
Email this article 