Continuity as Micropolicy of the Modern Companies
https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2018-9-36-41
Abstract
How to transfer power so that what has been created is not destroyed? This question is asked by politicians and business people from time immemorial. The problem of transferring power and management in general is relevant not only for monarchs, but also for business representatives. Provided that business is a family affair, the problem is doubled. The article analyzes various approaches to succession as a micro-policy process.
About the Author
A. M. Vafin
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (The Moscow School of Social and Economic Sciences)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Associate Professor of the Chair of Political and Legal Thought of the Moscow Higher School of Social and Economic Sciences of RANEPA (Moscow, Russian Federation), Master of Arts in Counselling, PhD in Political Sciences
References
1. Volkov D. A. Motivational aspects of continuity in family business // Russian business [Rossiiskoe predprinimatel’stvo]. 2013. N 16. P. 89–96. (In rus)
2. Volkov D.A. Continuity in family business // Innovation and investment [Innovatsii i investitsii]. 2015. N 12. P. 54–58. (In rus)
3. Deleuze G., Guattari F. A Thousand Plateaus. Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Yekaterinburg : U-Factory; M. : Astrel, 2010. (In rus)
4. Foucault M. Intellectuals and power: Chosen political articles, performances and interview. M. : Praxis, 2002. (In rus)
5. Etkind A. Foucault and thesis of internal colonization // New literary review [Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie]. 2001. N 49. URL: http://magazines.russ.ru/nlo/2001/49/etkind.html (Date of the address: 14.05.2018). (In rus)
6. Atkinson W.P. Succession-management, Jesus-style // Journal of the European Pentecostal Theological Association. 2016. N 2. P. 1–12.
7. Cabrera-Suarez K., Martin-Santana J. Successor’s commitment and succession success: dimensions and antecedents in the small Spanish family firm // The International Journal of Human Resource Management. 2012. N 13.
8. Cesaroni F.M., Sentuti A. Family business succession and external advisors: the relevance of ‘soft’ issues // Small Enterprise Research. 2017. N 2. P. 167–188.
9. Hargreaves A. Leadership succession // The Educational Forum. 2005. N 2.
10. Holt R., Popp A. Emotion, succession, and the family firm: Josiah Wedgwood & Sons // Business History. 2013. N 6. P. 892–909.
Review
For citations:
Vafin A.M. Continuity as Micropolicy of the Modern Companies. Administrative Consulting. 2018;(9):36-41. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2018-9-36-41
Views:
544
Email this article 