Preview

Administrative Consulting

Advanced search

Mobility as a Life Quality Domain

https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2018-9-79-93

Abstract

The land areas covered by cities are growing rapidly in size in the 21st century, and huge urban agglomerations and megalopolises are becoming highly interconnected. Their functioning is impossible without rapid transportation modes providing the possibility to populations to move easily in the daily rhythms of life and commuting. This mobility has become an established “way of life,” growing hand in hand with increasing urbanism in the 20th century. As a consequence, mobility is now one of the most important subjects of research in a number of scientific disciplines.
This article analyzes different approaches to the theoretical research of mobility systems and assesses their practical effectiveness and efficiency. The approaches are evaluated as possible development ideas for the very unstable and underdeveloped mobility system in St.Petersburg, the second-largest city in Russia. Among other data, use is made of analytical reports and documents from Russian research centers and the municipal authorities of St.Petersburg.
The main research approach employs an analysis of comparative mobility systems, and it evaluates mobility as a crucial city life domain based on a mobility model developed by the author. The research results illustrate the character of the global mobility problem and the full inclusion of Russian cities into the modern context. They also provide a detailed picture of aspects of the problem which are relevant for St.Petersburg. The conclusion presents multiple ideas about the development rationality of city mobility systems: rail and computer controlled electric cars as possible solutions.

About the Author

R. M. Vulfovich
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (North-West Institute of Management of RANEPA)
Russian Federation
Doctor of Political Science, Professor of the Chair for State and Municipal Administration of North-West institute of management of RANEPA (St. Petersburg, Russian Federation)


References

1. Algaze D., Krummins A., Tempelton G. Making the move to smart cities. From transportation to pollution to security and beyond, the smart cities of tomorrow will revolutionize everything about how we live. In: PC Magazine. Digital Edition. June 2016. URL: https://www.pcmag.com/ article/344720/pc-magazine-june-2016 [last accessed 12 March 2018].

2. City Planning Laboratory [Laboratotiia Gradoplanirovaniia] Analytical Report “Transportation Problems in St. Petersburg to be solved on the complex planning of territorial transport system”. URL: http://labgrad.ru/d/180205/d/01_analiticheskayazapiska_problemytsspb29_05_2015.pdf [last accessed 12 March 2018].

3. Cummins R. A. Moving from quality of life concept to a theory. In: Journal of Intellectual Disability Research. October 2005. Vol. 49. Part 10. pp. 699–706.

4. Cusatellia C., Giacaloneb M., Troisic A. The citizen satisfaction survey on the local public transport in Bologna. In: Electronic Journal of Applied Statistical Analyses. 2016. Vol. 09. N 04. pp. 623-636. DOI:10.1285/i20705948v9n4p623

5. Danielis R., Rotaris L., Monte A. Composite indicators of sustainable urban mobility: Estimating the rankings frequency distribution combining multiple methodologies. In: International Journal of Sustainable Transportation. 2018. Vol. 12, Issue 5. pp. 380–395. URL: https://doi.org/ 10.1080/15568318.2017.1377789

6. Development Strategy for the Transport System of St. Petersburg and the Leningrad Region [Stratediia razvitiia transportnoi sistemy Sankt-Peterburga i Leningradskoi oblasti]. URL: http:// spbtrd.ru/program-development [last accessed 12 March 2018]

7. Ding Ch, Lai Sh.-K., Wang M.-Sh. Editorial. In: Global Urbanization and Urban Management. 2012. Vol. 1, N 1. pp. 1–2.

8. Doxiadis C. A. Man’s movement and his city. In: Science. 1986. Vol. 162. N 3851. pp. 326–334. 9. Dudley D. The uncanny power of a city without cars. URL: https://www.citylab.com/transportation/2017/01/the-uncanny-power-of-a-city-without-cars/513278/ [last accessed 12 March 2018]. 10. Facts and statistics on using public transport. URL: https://moovitapp.com/insights/ru/Moovit

9. [last accessed 12 March 2018].

10. Gelinas N. Congestion Pricing and de Blasio’s Mean streets. New Yorkers are safer—but more

11. gridlocked—than they’ve been since the invention of the automobile. In: City. Autumn 2017. URL: https://www.city-journal.org/html/congestion-pricing-and-de-blasios-mean-streets-15521. html [last accessed 12 March 2018].

12. Global Mobility Report 2017. Tracking sector performance. Sustainable mobility for all. URL:https:// openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/28542/120500.pdf [last accessed 12 March 2018]

13. Grigorev A., Serebritskii A. Report on ecological situation in St. Petersburg 2016. St. Petersburg: “Sezam-Print” 2017 [Grigorev A., Serebritskii Doklad ob ecologicheskoi obstanovke v SanktPeterburge v 2016 godu. Sankt-Peterburg. OOO “Sezam-Print” 2017] С. 4–7. URL: http://www. infoeco.ru/assets/files/Doklad/doklad_2016.pdf [last accessed 12 March 2018].

14. Hübner S. Modellierung und Bewertung von Maßnahmen zur Schaffung einer Stadt der kurzen Wege // Verkehrsökologische Schriftenreihe. 2017. Heft 9. URL: http://www.qucosa.de/fileadmin/data/qucosa/documents/22342/Huebner_2016_Stadt_der_kurzen_Wege.pdf [last accessed 12 March 2018].

15. ITF (2017). Linking People and Places. New Ways of Understanding Spatial Access in Cities. Corporate Partnership Report. OECD Publishing. Paris. URL: https://www.itf-oecd.org/sites/ default/files/docs/linking-people-places-spatial-access.pdf [last accessed 12 March 2018].

16. ITF (2017). Quantifying the Socio-economic Benefits of Transport. ITF Roundtable Reports. OECD Publishing. P.9. URL: http://www.keepeek.com/Digital-Asset-Management/oecd/transport/quantifying-the-socio-economic-benefits-of-transport_9789282108093-en.WpZyYKhl_IUpage2 [last accessed 12 March 2018].

17. Lucas K. Editorial for special issue of European Transport Research Review: Transport poverty and inequalities. In: European Transport Research Review. 2018. Vol. 10, N 17 https://doi. org/10.1007/s12544-018-0288-6

18. Moss St. The end of car’s era: How cities manage without cars [Konets ery avtomobilei: kak goroda otkazyvaiutsa ot avtomobiliei] URL: http://letsbikeit.ru/2016/03/end-of-the-car-age/ [last accessed 12 March 2018].

19. Popov V. The culture of new mobility in Russia: Networks and flows formation. In: Mobilities. February 2012. Vol. 7. N 1. pp. 151–169. P.2

20. Prigogine I., Stengers I. Order out of chaos. Man’s new dialog with nature. Toronto and others. 1984. 385 pp. URL: https://deterritorialinvestigations.files.wordpress.com/2015/03/ilya_prigogine_ isabelle_stengers_alvin_tofflerbookfi-org.pdf [last accessed 12 March 2018]. P. 2 (footnote 3)

21. Solodova D. Public transport fares worldwide. URL: https://birdinflight.com/ru/infografica/20160517public-transport-fares-worldwide.html

22. Sustainable Cities Mobility Index. Arcadis. URL: https://www.arcadis.com/en/global/our-perspectives/sustainable-cities-mobility-index-2017/ [last accessed 12 March 2018]

23. The development of Moscow’s transport system. URL: http://transport.mos.ru/common/upload/ docs/1475662554_Ekspertnyysovet_Liksutov29.09.pdf

24. Urban planning. URL: http://labgrad.ru/d/180205/d/01_analiticheskayazapiska_problemytsspb29_05_2015.pdf [last accessed 12 March 2018].

25. Vigren A., Ljungberg A. Public Transport Authorities‘ Use of Cost-Benefit Analyses in Practice. In: Centre for Transport Studies (Stockholm). CTS Working Paper. 2017:8. URL: http://www. diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A1104622&dswid=2150 [last accessed 12 March 2018]. P. 2 (cost-benefit analyses)


Review

For citations:


Vulfovich R.M. Mobility as a Life Quality Domain. Administrative Consulting. 2018;(9):79-93. https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2018-9-79-93

Views: 593


ISSN 1726-1139 (Print)
ISSN 1816-8590 (Online)