Strategic Branding in Russia: Development Barriers
https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2018-9-167-176
Abstract
Goal. Given the modern aspects of building a strong brand, the strategic assets of companies are their trademarks, which, with good governance, act as revenue generators. Recently, the problems of implementing an investment project with minimal risks and high efficiency become more acute, as in the current market there are many limiting factors that negatively affect the successful development of the domestic brand. The purpose of the study in this article is to identify internal and external factors that limit development and reduce the competitiveness of domestic brands in the Russian market in modern conditions.
Methods. In the study, using qualitative analysis of available statistics and examples, the main barriers to the presence of domestic brands are considered. The main methodology for building the development strategy of the company is proposed by the well-known economiststrategist, professor V. Kvint and has been tested in practice for 45 years.
Results. As a result of this research, a comparative competitive analysis of brands in the world and in Russia was conducted, statistical data of a large analytical source on intellectual property of WIPO were analyzed, five main negative factors influencing the development of the national branding industry in Russia were identified.
About the Authors
L. A. FilippovaRussian Federation
Graduate student of the Chair of Financial Strategy of Moscow School of Economics of Lomonosov Moscow State University (Moscow, Russian Federation);
A. S. Khvorostyanaya
Russian Federation
Graduate student of the Chair of Financial Strategy of Moscow School of Economics of Lomonosov Moscow State University (Moscow, Russian Federation);
References
1. Azgaldov G.G., Kostin A.V. Intellectual property, innovations and qualimetry // Economic strategy [Ekonomicheskie strategii]. 2008. N 2. P. 162–164. (In rus)
2. Antonova N. V. Features of perception of domestic and foreign brands by the Russian consumers // III International scientific and practical conference “Economic psychology: past, presentl, future” [III Mezhdunarodnaya nauchno-prakticheskaya konferentsiya «Ekonomicheskaya psikhologiya: proshloe, nastoyashchee, budushchee»]. P. 2. Issue 3. Saratov : LLC Litt., 2016. P. 6–13. (In rus)
3. Gorshenina M. V., Dolzhenkova O. V., Kovaleva A. M. Branding in Russia: features and problems of assessment // Young scientist [Molodoi uchenyi]. 2012. N 12. P. 188–190. (In rus)
4. Kvint V. The Global Emerging Market. Strategic management and economics. M. : Business Atlas, 2012. 422 p. (In rus)
5. Kozyr’Yu.V.,KostinA.V.Monetaryname:howmuchfortrademark?//Consultant[Konsul’tant]. N 15, August, 2009. P. 32–36. (In rus)
6. Kostin A.V., Chernozub O.L. Price of a brand: how to earn more by means of what, it seems, isn’t present // IS. Industrial property [Promyshlennaya sobstvennost’]. 2004. N 11. P. 64–71. (In rus)
7. Molchanov N.N., Golovnev D.S. Marketing and strategic management // Messenger of the St. Petersburg University [Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta]. 2016. Series 5. Issue 1. P. 80–105. (In rus)
8. Neumeier M. The Brand Gap: How to Bridge the Distance between Business Strategy and Design. M. : Williams, 2006. 192 p. (In rus)
9. Tretiak O.A. Brand-capital: contents, monetary assessment and management // Brand management [Brend-menedzhment]. 2001. N 2. P. 5–6. (In rus)
10. Hvorostyanaya A.S. The fashion industry — a striking example of development of creative economy // Economy and management [Ekonomika i upravlenie]. 2014. N 6. P. 62–65. (In rus)
11. Hvorostyanaya A.S., Kuznetsova K.V. Theoretical bases of fashion industry strategizing // Economy and management [Ekonomika i upravlenie]. 2016. N 4. P. 33–38. (In rus)
12. Hvorostyanaya A. S. Use of a technique of financial strategy in management of assets of creative economy // Economy and management [Ekonomika i upravlenie]. 2017. N 8. P. 67–74. (In rus)
13. Tsapenko A.M., Danilina E.A. The trademark in the system of branding of information technologies. M. : Information and publishing center “Patent”, 2007. 64 p. (In rus)
14. Aaker D.A. Measuring Brand Equity across Products and Markets. California Management Review.1996. 38(3): 102–120.
15. Ansoff I. Strategies for diversification. Harvard Business Review. 1957. Vol. 35, N 5, 113.
16. Kapferer J.-N. The New Strategic Brand Management: Creating and Sustaining Brand Equity Long Term: Fourth edition. London and Philadelphia: Kogan Page. 2008. P. 31–56, 253–314, 378–477.
17. Keller K.L. Branding and Brand Equity, MSI Relevant Knowledge Series. Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute. 2002.
18. Kotler P. The new strategic brand management. Kogan page, London and Philadelphia. 2008. P. 143.
19. Kvint V. Strategy for the Global Market. Theory and Practical Applications. Routledge NY, London : Sydney: Routledge Taylor&Francis Group. 2016. Р. 520.
20. Leuthesser L. Defining, measuring and managing brand equity. Marketing Science Institute. Report N 88–104, Cambridge, MA. 1988.
21. Schechter A. Names changes increase, Marketing News, American Marketing Association. 1993. 1 March. P. 1.
22. Schlossberg H. Brand value can be worth more than physical assets. Marketing News. 1990. 5 Mar. P. 6.
23. Yovovich B.G. What is your brand really worth? Adweek’sMarketing Week. 1988. 8 August. P. 18–24.
24. Wernerfelt B. Advertising content when brand choice is a signal, Journal of Business. 1990. 63 (1). P. 91–98.
25. Zhang S., Schmitt B. Creating local brands in a multilingual international market. Journal of Marketing Research. 2001. 38, Aug. P. 313–325.
Review
For citations:
Filippova L.A., Khvorostyanaya A.S. Strategic Branding in Russia: Development Barriers. Administrative Consulting. 2018;(9):167-176. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2018-9-167-176