Possible Problems with the Use of Regional Ratings
https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2019-10-49-60
Abstract
The article is devoted to the problems of applying regional ratings. It is shown that at each stage of ratings’ calculation there are several problems and assumptions that impose restrictions on their use in statistical and econometric analysis. At the same time, in the absence of real alternatives to integral indices, on the basis of which rating scores are built, it is necessary to continue working on their improvement in order to use them as analysis tools and strategic management decision-making factors.
About the Author
A. K. Zhikhareva
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Alina K. Zhikhareva, Senior lecturer of General Economic Theory Department
Moscow
References
1. Aivazyan S. A. Analysis of quality and way of life of the population (econometric approach). CEMI RAS. M. : Science, 2012. (In rus)
2. Balatskiy E. World Experience in the Compilation and Use of University Faculty Ratings // Society and Economics [Obshchestvo i ekonomika]. 2012. N 9. P. 155–173. (In rus)
3. Bortnik I. M. [etc]. System of evaluation and monitoring of innovative development of regions of Russia // Innovations [Innovatsii]. 2012. N 9. P. 25–38. (In rus)
4. Burenina I. V., Byl E. A. Rating System of Evaluation of Sustainable Development of Territorial Entities: Russian and World Experience // Internet Journal “Knowledge” [Internet-zhurnal «Naukovedenie»]. 2016. V. 8. N 2. URL: http://naukovedenie.ru/PDF/99EVN216.pdf (In rus)
5. Valitova L. A. Possibilities of using investment ratings as targets in results-based budgeting // Russian-European Economic Policy Center, 2005. (In rus)
6. Gohberg L. M. [etc]. Rating of innovative development of subjects of the Russian Federation. M. : HSE, 2012. (In rus)
7. Grishina I. V., Marukhin I., Shestopalova I. Methodology of research and experience of assessing investment attractiveness of regions of Russia // Federalism [Federalizm]. 2013. V. 1. P. 39–56. (In rus)
8. Gromyko G. L. Theory of Statistics. M. : INFRA-M., 2005. (In rus)
9. Gusev A. B. Formation of ratings of innovative development of regions of Russia // Science. Innovations. Education [Nauka. Innovatsii. Obrazovanie]. 2009. N 8. P. 158–173. (In rus)
10. Demidova O. A., Malakhov D. I. Econometric: textbook and workshop for applied baccalaureate. M. : Urait, 2018. (In rus)
11. Zemtsov S. [etc]. Factors of innovative activity of regions of Russia: what is more important - person or capital? // Foresight [Forsait]. 2016. V. 10. N 2. P. 29–42. (In rus)
12. Ivin E. A., Artamonov N. V., Kurbatsky A. N. Methodological Manual on Econometrics: for SocioEconomic Specialties. Vologda : VolRS RAS, 2016. (In rus)
13. Kartayev F. S., Polunin K. E. Does the rating of the investment climate affect the economic development of the region? // Economic issues [Voprosy ekonomiki]. 2019. N 5. P. 90–102. (In rus)
14. Kvint V. Strategic Management and Economics. M. : Business Atlas. 2012. (In rus)
15. Lugovoi O. [etc]. Economic-geographical and institutional aspects of economic growth in regions : monograph. M. : IEP, 2007. (In rus)
16. Maltseva A. A. [et al]. Statistical analysis of methodological approaches to the rating of regions in the innovation sphere // News of the Tula State University. Economic and legal sciences [zvestiya Tul’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki]. 2014. N 3-1. P. 273–283. (In rus)
17. Nikolaenko S. A., Belyanova E. V., Smorodinov O. V. Problems of application of international ra tings: society, state, economy. ERGO, 2009. (In rus)
18. Rayskaya N. N., Sergienko Ya. V., Frenkel A. A. Rating of regions by integral indicator of investment attractiveness // Statistics issues [Voprosy statistiki]. 2009. N 1. P. 56–60. (In rus)
19. Untura G. A. Analysis of statistical links between investment climate ratings and actual investments in regions of Russia // Region: economics and sociology [Region: ekonomika i sotsiologiya]. 2004. N 1. P. 200–210. (In rus)
20. Libman A. Democracy, size of bureaucracy, and economic growth: evidence from Russian regions // Empirical Economics. 2012. V. 43. N 3. P. 1321–1352.
21. Popov V. Reform strategies and economic performance of Russia’s regions //World Development. 2001. V. 29. N 5. P. 865–886.
22. Strasky J., Pashinova T. What drives FDI to Russian regions // Deutsche Bank Research. 2012. P. 1–9.
23. Zubarevich N. Four Russias: human potential and social differentiation of Russian regions and cities // Russia 2025. London : Palgrave Macmillan, 2013. P. 67–85.
Review
For citations:
Zhikhareva A.K. Possible Problems with the Use of Regional Ratings. Administrative Consulting. 2019;(10):49-60. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2019-10-49-60
Views:
389
Email this article 