National-Cultural Autonomy in the System of Dialogue between the Government and Civil Society: The Communication Dimension of the Process of Nation-Building in Modern Russia (Using the Example of the Volga Federal District)

Aims: identification of the political and legal conditions of the normative and organizational plan, fixing the possibilities and limits of enhancing the participation of civil society institutions in achieving the goals of the state national policy of the Russian Federation and in promoting the process of nation-building in the context of the guidelines declared by the authorities.

Methods: unformalized traditional analysis of documents, formal legal method, methods of political diagnostics, comparative and system analysis.

Results and discussion: the content and structure of the communication system of the state and civil society institutions (with an emphasis on national and cultural autonomy) at the Federal and regional levels are characterized. The experience of the republics — subjects of the Russian Federation included in the Volga Federal district is investigated, its features taking into account the ethnopolitical factor are shown.

Conclusion: National-cultural public associations play at the present stage an indispensable role in the formation and development of ethno-cultural and all-Russian civil identities. However, only national-cultural autonomies, whose opportunities for political influence are extremely limited, are actually built into the normative communication system. The identified gaps and vulnerabilities at the national level encourage the improvement of management practices. It is necessary to intensify information and educational work in terms of updating the content of official websites and wider coverage of the activities of state bodies, public associations and Advisory councils. This will make it possible to strengthen the publicity, transparency and attractiveness of management decisions for citizens, national minorities, titular Nations and diasporas, the activities carried out and ensure the achievement of not only formal but also qualitative target indicators.

1. Azarenok V.A. National and cultural autonomy «Belarusians of the Urals» («Belur») and the strengthening of interethnic relations // Eko-potencial [Eko-potencial]. 2019. N 1 (25). P. 243–250. (In rus)

2. Anisimov A. I. Forms of realization of the right of peoples to self-determination in the conditions of Federal structure of Russia // Legal research [Yuridicheskie issledovaniya]. 2018. N 2. P. 27–33. (In rus)

3. Babintsev V.P., Shapovalova Zh.A. Public communications of the authority and society in the region: problems and opportunities of constructive changes // Authority [Vlast’]. 2018. Vol. 26. N 4. P. 7–15. (In rus)

4. Bakhlov I. V., Bakhlova O. V. Legal policy of the Russian Federation in the field of nation-building: directions and results of activity of parliamentary committees // Comparative federalism. Yearbook–2018: Collection of proceedings [Sravnitel’nyj federalizm. Ezhegodnik-2018: Sbornik nauchnyh trudov]. Penza : Penza state University, 2018. P. 125–133. (In rus)

5. Dorofeyeva E.S., Chekmareva A. V. Political and legal aspects of state regulation of interethnic relations // Actual problems of state and law [Aktual’nye problemy gosudarstva i prava]. 2018. Vol. 2. N 7. P. 5–22. (In rus)

6. Emelkina I. A. State cultural policy and work of non-profit organizations of the Finno-Ugric peoples in the common cultural space of Russia: legal aspects // Finno-Ugric World [Finnougorskij mir]. 2015. N 2 (23). P. 102–107. (In rus)

7. Izergina N. I., Izergina V. P. The National-cultural autonomies in the realization of national policy of the Republic of Mordovia // Social and political Sciences [Social’no-politicheskie nauki]. 2012. N 2. P. 40–44. (In rus)

8. Ilarionova T.S. State and national-cultural autonomy of the peoples of Russia: current problems and prospects // Ethnosocium and inter-ethnic culture [Etnosocium i mezhnacional’naya kul’tura]. 2010. N 3 (27). P. 44–65. (In rus)

9. Kirdyashov V. F., Tultaev P. N. National-cultural autonomy is one of the priorities of the national policy of Russia: regional aspect (on the example of Mordvins in the Russian Federation) [Nacional’no-kul’turnaya avtonomiya — odin iz prioritetov nacional’noj politiki Rossii: regional’nyj aspekt (na primere mordvy v Rossijskoj Federacii)]. Saransk: Mordovian book publishing house, 2006. (In rus)

10. Mochalov A. N. Constitutional Tools of Managing Ethnic Diversity in Multinational Federations // Bulletin of Tyumen state University. Socio-economic and legal research [Vestnik Tyumenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Social’no-ekonomicheskie i pravovye issledovaniya]. 2018. Vol. 4. N 3. P. 136–151. (In rus)

11. Muradyan L. O. The concept of national and cultural autonomy in post-Soviet Russia // Issues of national and Federal relations [Voprosy nacional’nyh i federativnyh otnoshenij]. 2018. Vol. 8. N 4 (43). P. 386–394. (In rus)

12. Napalkova I. G., Chekushkin A. N. Evolution of Political and Legal Status of Finno-Ugric Peoples in Russia // Finno-Ugric World [Finno-ugorskij mir]. 2013. N 4 (17). P. 85–91. (In rus)

13. Nikovskaya L. I., Yakimets V. N. Formation and Advocacy of the Public Interests in Russia: from «Administrative» to Partner Model // Polis. Policy studies [Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya]. 2015. N 5. P. 49–63. (In rus)

14. Interethnic accord at all-Russian and Regional Dimension. Socio-cultural and religious contexts [Mezhnacional’noe soglasie v obshcherossijskom i regional’nom izmerenii. Sociokul’turnyj i religioznyj konteksty] / Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Moscow, 2018. (In rus)

15. Osipov A. G. National-Cultural Autonomy after the USSR: Symbolic or Instrumental Policies? // Political expertise: POLITEKS [Politicheskaya ekspertiza: POLITEKS]. 2012. Vol. 8. N 1. P. 200– 222. (In rus)

16. Polutin S. V., Shumkova N. V., Chushkin A. M. The ethnic religious situation in the Republic of Mordovia: a sociological aspect // News of higher educational institutions. Volga region. Social science [Izvestiya vysshih uchebnyh zavedenij. Povolzhskij region. Obshchestvennye nauki]. 2018. N 1 (45). P. 134–147. (In rus)

17. Romanovskaya O. V. Legal status of national-cultural autonomies // Culture: management, Economics, law [Kul’tura: upravlenie, ekonomika, pravo]. 2013. N 2. P. 16–21. (In rus)

18. Sevoyan D. G. On the question of the main spheres of activity of national and cultural autonomies // Politics and society [Politika i obshchestvo]. 2014. N 12 (120). P. 1479–1484. (In rus)

19. Semenenko I.S. Horizons of Responsible Development: from Discourse to Governance // Polis. Policy studies [Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya]. 2019. N 3. P. 7–26. (In rus)

20. Habrieva T. Ya. National-cultural autonomy as a modern form of ethnic self-organization // Bulletin of the Russian nation [Vestnik Rossijskoj nacii]. 2013. N 1–2 (27–28). P. 122–141. (In rus)

21. Arnold R., Markowitz L. P. The evolution of violence within far-right mobilization: evidence from Russia // Ethnic and Racial Studies. 2017. Vol. 41. N 1. P. 1–16.

22. Busygina I. How Does Russian Federalism Work? Looking at Internal Borders in the Russian Federation // Journal of Borderlands Studies. 2017. Vol. 32. N 1. P. 105–119.

23. Daly S. Z. State Strategies in Multi-Ethnic Territories: Explaining Variation in the Former Soviet Union and Eastern Bloc // British Journal of Political Science. 2014. Vol. 44. N 2. P. 381–408.

24. Fabrykant M., Magun V. Dynamics of National Pride Attitudes in Post-Soviet Russia, 1996–2015 // Nationalities Papers: The Journal of Nationalism and Ethnicity. 2019. Vol. 47. N 1. P. 20–37.

25. Herrera Y. M., Butkovich Kraus N. M. Pride Versus Prejudice: Ethnicity, National Identity, and Xenophobia in Russia // Comparative Politics. 2016. Vol. 48. N 3. P. 293–315.

26. Kolstø P., Blakkisrud H., eds. The New Russian Nationalism: Imperialism, Ethnicity and Authoritarianism 2000–2015. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2016.

27. Laine V. Contemporary. Russian nationalisms: the state, nationalist movements, and the shared space in between // Nationalities Papers. 2017. Vol. 45. N 2. P. 222–237.

28. Moses J. Russian Center-Periphery Relations from Khrushchev to Putin, 1957–2018 // Demokratizatsiya. 2019. Vol. 27. N 2. P. 215–236.

29. Prina F. National minorities in Putin’s Russia: diversity and assimilation. London; New York: Routledge, 2016.

30. Stepan A. Russian Federalism in Comparative Perspective // Post-Soviet Affairs. 2013. Vol. 16. N 2. P. 133–176.