Host Community and Foreign Migrants: Regional Adaptation Practices

The article deals with the interaction of the host community and foreign migrants. The empirical base consists of sociological research data on the ethnic and religious situation in the Republic of Mordovia and the social well-being of diasporas of peoples living in the Republic of Mordovia. The studies were conducted by employees of the Scientific center of social-economic monitoring state institution in 2017–2019. The results show that there are no serious prerequisites for destabilization of interethnic relations in the region. The host community demonstrates a high level of tolerance towards foreign migrants. Representatives of the Azerbaijani and Armenian diasporas do not feel tension. Uzbeks, on the contrary, declare minor contradictions at the household level. The adaptation strategies of foreign migrants in the host community are significant. People from Azerbaijan and Armenia are focused on integration and have a hybrid ethnic identity. Citizens of Uzbekistan strive for segregation (or dissimilation), since they pursue purely instrumental goals that do not involve contacts with the local population. According to the interviewed foreign migrants, the common historical past has the greatest potential for uniting representatives of various nationalities. But, as our data show, successful adaptation requires its configuration with other determinants, such as common culture, kinship, etc. It is noted that the accumulated experience of the Republic of Mordovia in regulating interethnic relations and conducting research in this area has demonstrated its effectiveness, therefore, it can be transferred to other subjects of the Russian Federation.

migrants, host community, assimilation, segregation, integration, marginalization

1. Brubaker R. Ethnicity without groups / translation from English by I. Borisova. M. : Publishing House of the Higher School of Economics, 2012. (In rus).

2. Budenkova V. E., Savelieva E. N. Identity as a topic of theoretical and methodological analysis: models and approaches // Tomsk State University Journal of Cultural Studies and Art History [Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Kul’turologiya i iskusstvovedenie]. 2016. N 1. P. 31–44. (In rus).

3. Gritsenko G. D., Maslova T. F. Migrants in new community: adaptation and/or integration // Sociological Studies [Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya]. 2010. N 5. P. 82–86. (In rus).

4. Dmitriev A. V., Pyadukhov G. A. Migrants and society: the integration and disintegration potential of the practices of interaction // Sociological studies [Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya]. 2011. N 12. P. 50–59. (In rus).

5. Ivanov V. N. Determinants of international (interethnic) conflicts in the Russian Federation regions // RUDN Journal of Sociology [Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Ser.: Sotsiologiya]. 2012. N 3. P. 38–47. (In rus).

6. Integration of migrants with different cultural background: prospects of interculturalism / I. Tsapenko, I. Grishin eds. M. : IMEMO, 2018. (In rus).

7. Kozin V. V., Motkin V. N. Assimilation and dissimilation: dichotomy of development of the ethnic environment // The dynamics of the social environment as a factor in the development of the need for new professionals in the field of social work and the organization of work with young people / ed. by prof. Z. H. Saralieva. Nizhny Novgorod : Publishing House of NISEC, 2019. P. 134–138. (In rus).

8. Merkulov P. A. Distribution of the Ideology of Terrorism in the Youth Environment: Modern Realities and Directions of Counteraction // Administrative Consulting [Upravlencheskoe konsul’tirovanie]. 2019. N 5. P. 88–94. (In rus).

9. Minichkina V.P., Ruskina E.S. Epos as a factor in the formation of ethical identity of the person (on the example of the Republic of Mordovia) // Finno-Ugric World [Finno-ugorskii mir]. Vol. 11. 2019. N 1. P. 101–114. (In rus).

10. Mukomel V. I. Integration problems of internal ethnic migrant workers // Sociological studies [Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya]. 2016. N 5. P. 69–79. (In rus).

11. The Republic of Mordovia through the eyes of sociologists: a scientific reference book / ed. by V. V. Konakov, E. A. Demyanov; Scientific Center of Social-Economic Monitoring State Institution. Saransk, 2017. (In rus).

12. Stepanova A. A., Symaniuk E. E. Ethnocultural training as a factor in preventing ethnic alienation of a personality // The Education and science journal [Obrazovanie i nauka]. 2019. Vol. 21. N 5. P. 157–180. (In rus).

13. Urry D. Mobilities / translation from English by A. Lazarev. M. : Praxis, 2012. (In rus).

14. Fofanova K. V., Borisov D. M. Network Resource as the Factor of Integration of Foreign Labor Migrants to Regional Society // The Journal of Social Policy Studies [Zhurnal issledovanii sotsial’noi politiki]. 2013. Vol. 11. N 2. P. 189–206. (In rus).

15. Heino E., Kärmeniemi N., Katisko M., Borodkina O. Factors Affecting the Integration of Migrants and Features of Social Work among Migrants in Finland // The journal of sociology and social anthropology [Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsial’noi antropologii]. 2015. Vol. 18. N 5. P. 199–212. (In rus).

16. Bagchi A. D. Migrant networks and the immigrant professional: An analysis of weak ties // Population Research and Policy Review. 2001. Vol. 20. N 1–2. P. 9–31.

17. Berry J. W. Immigration, acculturation, and adaptation // Applied psychology: an international review. 1997. Vol. 46. N 1. P. 5–68.

18. Grimes A., Wesselbaum D. Moving Towards Happiness? // International Migration. 2019. Vol. 57. N 3. P. 20–40.

19. Levitt P., Jaworsky B. N. Transnational migration studies: past developments and future trends // Annual Review of Sociology. 2007. Vol. 33. P. 129–156.

20. Melzer S. M. Does migration make you happy? The influence of migration on subjective wellbeing // Journal of Social Research and Policy. 2011. Vol. 2. N 2. P. 73–92.

21. Poletaev D. V. From mistrust to solidarity or more mistrust? Russia’s migration experience in the international context // Russia in Global Affairs. 2019. Vol. 17. N 1. P. 171–197.

22. Rumbaut R. G. Severed or Sustained Attachments? Language, Identity, and Imagined Communities in the Post-Immigrant Generation // The Changing Face of Home: The Transnational Lives of the Second Generation / P. Levitt, M. C. Waters eds. New York : Russell Sage Foundation, 2002. P. 43–95.

23. Seo S. Temporalities of class in Nepalese labour migration to South Korea // Current Sociology. 2019. Vol. 67. N 2. P. 186–205.

24. Vasilieva E., Danilova E., Tokareva S. Migration attractiveness of the social and economic spaces: Volgograd case study // Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management. 2017. Vol. 12. N 1. P. 5–20.

25. Volkova O., Ostavnaya A., Besschetnova O., Kovalchuk O., Bystriantsev S. Pridnestrovian migrant workers in the country of the recipient: quality of life and employment features // Journal of History Culture and Art Research. 2017. Vol. 6. N 3. P. 1517–1526.