Preview

Administrative Consulting

Advanced search

Modernity and Tradition in Russian Geopolitics (Second Article)

https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2020-2-10-15

Abstract

Geopolitical studies differ from many others in the social sciences in that the seemingly studied issues and topics must be addressed repeatedly. Russia, as an object of geopolitical research, is already a tradition, but the external conditions are changing. The era of globalization, rapid as a flood water in Siberia, is over. Trends of protectionism and regionalization are increasing. In these circumstances, traditional perceptions, established and seemingly stayed over the years, require reassessment. It is obvious that Russia is an independent player in the global Eurasian space. But what should be the pattern of behavior, what should be the extent of our foreign economic and foreign policy openness, considering new developments in the global world? An attempt to answer these questions is made in the proposed article.

About the Authors

N. M. Mezhevich
Institute of Europe of Russian Academy of Science
Russian Federation

Nikolay M. Mezhevich, Chief Researcher, Doctor of Science (Economics), Professor

Saint-Petersburg



V. A. Shamakhov
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (North-West Institute of Management of RANEPA)
Russian Federation

Vladimir A. Shamakhov, Director, Doctor of Science (Economics), PhD in History, Professor

Saint-Petersburg



References

1. Azroyantz E. Globalization: a disaster or a path to development? M., 2002. (In rus)

2. Belarus and Baltic states in the system of transport policy of Russia and China: scientific report / N. M. Mezhevich, V. A. Shamakhov. SPb. : NWIM of RANEPA, 2019. 54 p. (In rus)

3. Dulov A. V. Geographical environment and history Russia end of XV — middle of XIX century M. : Science, 1983. (In rus)

4. Kaplan R. The Revenge of Geography. What the Map Tells Us About Coming Conflicts and the Battle Against Fate. M. : Azbuka-Atticus, 2015. (In rus)

5. Kissinger G. Diplomacy. M.,1997. (In rus)

6. Martin G.-P., Schumann H. Western Globalization. Attack on prosperity and democracy. M., 2001. (In rus)

7. Pototskaya T. I., Silnichaya A. V. State of geographical geopolitical research in modern Russia // Baltic region [Baltiiskii region]. 2019. V. 11. No. 2. P. 112–135. (In rus)

8. Solonevich I. L. People ‘s Empire. M.,1991. (In rus)

9. Khmelnitskaya E. L. Monopolistic capitalism of West Germany. M. : IMO, 1959. (In rus)

10. Tsymbursky V. L. Island Russia (Perspectives of Russian Geopolitical) // Political researches [Politicheskie issledovaniya]. 1993. No. 5. P. 6–23. (In rus)

11. Tsymbursky V. L. Island Russia. Geopolitical and chronopolitical works: 1993–2006. M., 2007. (In rus)

12. Chuprov A. Railway economy, its economic features and its attitude to the interests of the country. M., 1875. (In rus)

13. Yadrintsev N. M. Siberia as a colony in geographical, ethnographic and historical terms. 2nd edition. SPb. : Publishing house of I. M. Sibyriakov, 1892. (In rus)

14. Fawcett L. Regionalism in Historical Perspective // Regionalism in World Politics. Ed. by Fawcett L. and Hurell A. Oxford University Press, 1995.


Review

For citations:


Mezhevich N.M., Shamakhov V.A. Modernity and Tradition in Russian Geopolitics (Second Article). Administrative Consulting. 2020;(2):10-15. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2020-2-10-15

Views: 441


ISSN 1726-1139 (Print)
ISSN 1816-8590 (Online)