Preview

Administrative Consulting

Advanced search

Geopolitical Analysis of the Crimean Peninsula and the Black Sea in the Context of Turkish-Russian Energy Policy

https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2020-2-134-147

Abstract

The introductory paragraphs of the article consider the historical approach to how important the black sea and Crimea are in geopolitical terms, which became more important after the eighteenth century. In addition, the main issue that was studied in the article; the Maritime geopolitics of the black sea and Crimean peninsulas in accordance with the new situation that arose as a result of the annexation of Crimea to Russia after the referendum, as well as the state of Turkey’s energy needs and how the issue of energy security will be resolved in the future. Although Turkey has two important waterways, such as the Straits of Istanbul and the Dardanelles, it has been appreciated why it cannot turn this superiority into some kind of advantage. The data used in the article is usually based on official reports published by government agencies. The point from which mutual trade relations between Turkey and Russia originate, through gas pipelines, and the benefits and harms of the situation are discussed. Both in the Black sea and partly in the Eastern Mediterranean, gas exploration operations are underway; their reflection in Turkish foreign policy has been deconstructed. Questions such as how much natural gas Turkey needs per year and which countries import gas that needs it were discussed with the data.

About the Author

F. Gide
Saint-Petersburg State University
Russian Federation

Fatih Gide, Postgraduate Student, International Relations and World Politics

Saint-Petersburg



References

1. Chaycioghlu S. O. Caucasus Policy of Russia in the Early 18th Century: Peter the Great’s Campaign of Iran // VakanuvisInternational Journal of Historical Researches. Special Issue on Caucasia. 2017. Vol. 2. P. 115–132. (in Turkish)

2. Duman S. Imperial Attemp in the Eastern Mediterranean and Turkey // Journal of The Black Sea Studies. 2019. Vol. 16(62). P. 213–230 (in Turkish)

3. Ediger V. Sh., Devlen B., Mcdonald D. B. The Great Game in the Levant: Energy Geopolitics in the Eastern Mediterranean // The Journal of International Relations. 2012. Vol. 9 (33). P. 73–92. (in Turkish)

4. Herguner M. The President of the Turkish Straits and Straits Commission in the Early Years of the Republic Vasıf (Temel) Pasha. Istanbul: Turkish Marine Research Foundation Publication, 2004. (in Turkish)

5. Ilhan S. Geopolitical Developments and Turkish World // Eurasian Studies. 1995a. Vol. 2 (3). P. 23–37. (in Turkish)

6. Ilhan S. Concept and Elements of Geopolitics // Eurasian Folder (Geopolitic Secial Issue). 2002b. Vol. 8(4). P. 318–322. (in Turkish)

7. Malyshev D. V. Kerch Crisis and The Status of The Azov Sea // Post-Soviet Studies. 2019. Vol. 2(2). P. 982–989. (in Russian)

8. Ozturk M. Evaluation of the Process between the Treaties of Ayastefanos and Berlin in Terms of Tsarist Russia // EURASIA Journal of International Studies. 2018. Vol. 6(15). P. 676–687. (in Turkish)

9. Energy Market Regulation Institution of Turkey. Natural Gas Market Sector Report For 2018. Ankara: 2019. (in Turkish)


Review

For citations:


Gide F. Geopolitical Analysis of the Crimean Peninsula and the Black Sea in the Context of Turkish-Russian Energy Policy. Administrative Consulting. 2020;(2):134-147. https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2020-2-134-147

Views: 780


ISSN 1726-1139 (Print)
ISSN 1816-8590 (Online)