Preview

Administrative Consulting

Advanced search

Political Elite as Key Resource of Military Security in Contemporary Society

https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2020-6-21-29

Abstract

Justification of the political elite as the key socio-political resource of military security is the purpose of this article. The method of research is structural and functional analysis of mili tary security through the prism of activating its socio-political resource. As a result of the research, a new approach to classifying the functions of modern political elites as a key resource of military security has been proposed. The article concludes that military security today should be understood as all actions of power structures of the military organization, authorities at all levels of government, as well as public organizations, which are aimed at preventing and neutralizing real and possible threats and dangers of military nature. The problem of military security is one of the central issues for any modern state, since, along with the process of universal globalization, the authorities continue to be the guarantor of the rights and freedoms of their people. Military security is considered to be actions of power structures of the military organization, authorities at all levels of government, as well as public organizations. These institutions and structures aim at preventing and neutralizing any possible threat that is military in nature. Military security and its effectiveness depends on the activities and ideology of political elites in identifying, preventing, eliminating or minimizing of threats. Decision-making on military security takes place with the participation of the entire military and political leadership of the country, which is part of the political elite, and with direct or indirect influence of the wider political elites. The article substantiates the main functions of modern political elites. They include geopolitical function (formation and reproduction of geographic and political-communication borders); normalization function (interpretation of the “normality” of the state in the context of war/world); communication function (ability to understand social interests, values and demands). The author comes to the conclusion that the basis of modern domestic political effectiveness is the stable character of the formation and functioning of the elite, i. e. overcoming its internal fragmentation and fragmentation.

About the Author

M. A. Amurov
Federation Council of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Mark A. Amurov, Assistant Member

Moscow



References

1. Vershilov S. A. Essence and importance of military security in the existence of the state through the lens of social and philosophical analysis [Electronic resource] // Internet journal “World of Science” [Mir nauki]. 2015. N 1. URL: http: // mir-nauki.com/PDF/23FILSMN115.pdf (In rus)

2. Vikulov S. F., Pozharov A. I., Grebenik V. V. Economics of military construction: new paradigm/ ed. G. A. Lavrinov, S. F. Vikulov. Yaroslavl: LLC IPC “Litera,” 2008. (In rus)

3. Vozhenikov A. V. National Security: Theory, Politics, Strategy. M.: NGO “MODULE,” 2018. (In rus)

4. Civil protection/commonly ed. S. K. Shoygu; Emercom of Russia. Moscow Printing House N 2, 2006. (In rus)

5. Grebenik V. V. Modern methodological basis for ensuring the relationship between the economic and military security of the nuclear state [Electronic resource] // Internet journal “Knowledge” [Naukovedenie]. 2013. N 2. https://www.library.ru/download/elibrary_19009376_54733254.pdf (In rus)

6. Zhurilo P. P. Mechanism for Ensuring Economic Security of the Russian Federation in Modern Conditions // Ars Administrandi. 2012. N 4. P. 66–75. (In rus)

7. Ivashov L. G. World on the fault of history. Chronicles of geopolitical battles. M.: Book World, 2018. (In rus)

8. Kochetkov V. V. Cultural dimension of hybrid wars // Journal of Moscow University. Series 18. Sociology and political science [Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 18. Sotsiologiya i politologiya]. 2015. N 4. P. 263–267. (In rus)

9. Makarenko I. K., Morozov V. S. Military security of the state: essence, structure and ways of ensuring at the present stage. M.: RAGS Publishing House, 2003. (In rus)

10. Osavelyuk E. A. Role of mass media in ensuring information security of Russia in Eurasian space // International cooperation of Eurasian states: politics, economy, law [Mezhdunarodnoe sotrudnichestvo evraziiskikh gosudarstv: politika, ekonomika, pravo]. 2016. N 3. P. 94–104. (In rus)

11. Peven' L.V. Army and society on the path of modernization: monograph. M.: Military University, 2012. (In rus)

12. Ponedelkov A.V., Scherbakova L.I. Role and place of regional elites in ensuring internal security of the region // Journal of the South Russian State Technical University [Vestnik Yuzhno-Rossiiskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta]. 2015. No. 1. P. 156–161. (In rus)

13. Radikov I. V. War in the XXI Century and New Semantics of Russian Military Doctrine // Historical, Philosophical, Political and Legal Sciences, Cultural Studies and Art History. Issues of theory and practice [Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul'turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki]. 2015. No. 5 (55). P. 1. P. 150–153. (In rus)

14. Shamakhov V.A., Balashov A.I. New social and political normality and lessons of modernization of the post-Soviet system of public administration // Administrative consulting [Upravlencheskoe konsul'tirovanie]. 2016. No. 12. P. 6–15. (In rus)

15. Shevchenko O. M., Shtofer L. L. The problem of economic security of the state in the context of global transformations: West - Russia // Humanitarium of the South of Russia [Gumanitarii Yuga Rossii]. 2018. V. 7. No. 5. P. 38–52. (In rus)

16. Bakker Ch., Sossai M. Multilevel Regulation of Military and Security Contractors: The Interplay between International, European and Domestic Norms. Bloomsbury Publishing, 2015.

17. Bekkevold J. I., Bowers I., Raska M. Security, Strategy and Military Change in the 21st Century: Cross-Regional Perspectives. Routledge, 2015.

18. Cordesman A. H. A Tragedy of Arms: Military and Security Developments in the Maghreb. Greenwood Publishing Group, 2015.

19. Elliot J. M., Reginald R. The Arms Control, Disarmament, and Military Security Dictionary. Wildside Press LLC, 2015.

20. Gary Schaub Jr., Kelty R. Private Military and Security Contractors: Controlling the Corporate Warrior. Rowman & Littlefield, 2016.

21. Gates R. M. Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China 2010: Annual Report to Congress. DIANE Publishing, 2015.

22. Kandil H. The Power Triangle: Military, Security, and Politics in Regime Change. Oxford University Press, 2015.

23. Niall K. K. Vision and Displays for Military and Security Applications: The Advanced Deployable Day/Night Simulation Project. Springer Science & Business Media, 2015.

24. Pattison J. The Morality of Private War: The Challenge of Private Military and Security Companies. Oxford University Press, 2015.

25. Woo J. Security Challenges and Military Politics in East Asia: From State Building to Post-Democratization. A&C Black, 2015.


Review

For citations:


Amurov M.A. Political Elite as Key Resource of Military Security in Contemporary Society. Administrative Consulting. 2020;(6):21-29. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2020-6-21-29

Views: 708


ISSN 1726-1139 (Print)
ISSN 1816-8590 (Online)