Digitalization of Local Government in a Big City: Tools, Barriers and Strategies

The purpose of this article is to identify barriers to the implementation of digitalization of local (municipal) government in a large city through an analysis of digitalization tools and strategies. In order to answer this question, an analysis of the e-government and digitialization of municipal governance frameworks in particular was conducted. The theory of diffusion of innovation and the concept of e-government (e-governance and local e-governance) formed the theoretical basis of the study. The empirical base of the research was formed by foreign and Russian platforms used in municipal governance: «Fix My Street», «Creative Citizens», «coUrbanize», «Urban Interactive Studio», «CityPlanner», «Commonplace», «Sticky World», «Crowdgauge», «Твой бюджет», «Наш Санкт-Петербург». Qualitative analysis of digital and text data was used as a method. The experience of implementation of digitization tools at local level of power in different countries was also analyzed. The conclusions made in this work are applicable to large cities and are mainly focused on the Russian Federation. The application of e-governance principles has three components: information transfer in the digital space, transactions and communication in it. If implemented correctly and gradually in a municipal administration, digitalization can increase citizen involvement and trust in government. Nevertheless, the characteristics of municipal government should not be underestimated before digital technologies are used. In many large cities, an established system of local government should be implemented before digitalization. When developing a strategy for implementation of digital technologies, it is important to understand the model of habitual behavior of residents of a given municipal entity, because a universal approach does not always yield positive results. The main barriers to digitalization include: the need for continuous improvement of security systems and methods of storage and processing of citizens’ data using cloud technologies, including the development of appropriate strategies and government programs, the need to adapt the various tools of digitalization to the requirements and capabilities of the local community, the difficulty in assessing citizens’ demand for certain electronic resources, the need for related training activities for both citizens and municipal employees themselves; the need to engage independent experts from different fields to ensure the relevance and effectiveness of municipalities’ electronic portals and platforms.

local government in Russia, digital technologies of municipal management, e-government, barriers to digitialization

1. Barbakov G. O., Ustinova O. V. To the problem of introduction of “Electronic Government” // Journal of ChelSU [Vestnik ChelGU]. 2015. N 26 (381). P. 109–113. (In rus)

2. Barinova N. I., Krivokora Yu. N. Modern information technologies as a way to improve municipal management // Kant. 2017. N 4 (25). P. 155–158. (In rus)

3. Bezvikonnaya E. V. Becoming a synergistic concept of local self-government in the context of government-paradigm // Science and modernity [Nauka i sovremennost’]. 2011. N 8-2. P. 8–12. (In rus)

4. Vidyasova L.A., Chuzhunov A. V. Demand for portals of state and municipal services (on the example of St. Petersburg ) // Issues of state and municipal administration [Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i munitsipal’nogo upravleniya]. 2017. N 2. P. 165–185. (In rus)

5. Grigoryev S. I., Guseva M. N. Information Technologies in Municipal Administration: Experience of Application on the Scale of the City District // Scientists Notes of the Tambov Branch of ROSMU [Uchenye zapiski Tambovskogo otdeleniya RoSMU]. 2018. N 10. P. 167–174. (In rus)

6. Kalinina A. E., Shevandrin A. V. Formation of electronic government elements in local selfgovernment bodies of municipalities // Power [Vlast’]. 2012. N 12. P. 17–21. (In rus)

7. Kuprina K. A., Hazanova D. L. Digitisation: concept, prerequisites of occurrence and scope of application // Journal of scientific conferences [Vestnik nauchnykh konferentsii]. 2016. N 5-5. P. 255–259. (In rus)

8. Logvinov K. V. Improving the Efficiency of Public Administration in Russia Based on the Introduction of the Concept of “Electronic Government” // Journal of the Bryansk State Technical University [Vestnik Bryanskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta]. 2016. N 5 (53). P. 230– 237. (In rus)

9. Mankov V. S. Democratization of Local Self-Government and Electronic Government // Journal of Moscow University. Economy [Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Ekonomika]. 2012. N 6. P. 58–66. (In rus)

10. Moiseeva A. A. Conditions and consequences of the digitisation of modern society: socioeconomic analysis // Messenger of the Tomsk State University. Philosophy. Sociology. Political science [Vestn. Tom. gos. un-ta. Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya]. 2017. N 39. P. 216–226. (In rus)

11. Savichev A. A. Local self-government in Russia: from electoral censorship to electronic democracy // Monitoring enforcement [Monitoring pravoprimeneniya]. 2015. N 4 (17). P. 23–27. (In rus)

12. Sidorov A. A. Electronic Government: Increasing Public Participation in State Administration // Public Administration. Electronic bulletin [Gosudarstvennoe upravlenie. Elektronnyi vestnik]. 2017. N 62. P. 87–103. (In rus)

13. Simbagaev S., Lipatova L. N. Regional experience of e-government organization // Russia: trends and prospects of development [Rossiya: tendentsii i perspektivy razvitiya]. 2019. N 14-2. P. 573–575. (In rus)

14. Smotritskaya I. I., Tchernykh S. I. Modern Trends of Digital Transformation of State Administration // Journal of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences [Vestnik Instituta ekonomiki RAN]. 2018. N 5. P. 22–36. (In rus)

15. Shamakhov V. A., Balashov A. I. New social and political normality and lessons of modernization of the post-Soviet management system // Administrative consulting [Upravlencheskoe konsul’tirovanie]. 2016. N 12. P. 6–15. (In rus)

16. Ali O., Shrestha A., Chatfield A., Murray P. Assessing information security risks in the cloud: A case study of Australian local government authorities. Government Information Quarterly. Vol. 37. Is. 1. 2020. P. 1–20.

17. Ardigó I. A. et al. Local government accountability mechanisms. Transparency International, 2019.

18. Arduini D. et al. The role of technology, organization and contextual factors in the development of e-Government services: An empirical analysis on Italian Local Public Administrations. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics. Vol. 27. 2013, P. 177–189.

19. Basu S. E-government and developing countries: An overview. International review of Law, Computers & Technology. Vol. 18. 2004. P. 109–132.

20. Berger J. B., Morten H., Schreiberb T. Does local government staff perceive digital communication with citizens as improved service? Government Information Quarterly Vol. 33. Is. 2. 2016. P. 258–269.

21. Bonsón E., Torres L., Royo S., Flores F. Local e-government 2.0: Social media and corporate transparency in municipalities. Government Information Quarterly. Vol. 29 (2). 2012. Р. 123–132.

22. Cegarra-Navarro J., Pachónb J. R., Cegarraa J. L. E-government and citizen’s engagement with local affairs through e-websites: The case of Spanish municipalities. International Journal of Information Management. Vol. 32. 2012. P. 469–478.

23. Falco Е., Kleinhans R. Beyond technology: Identifying local government challenges for using digital platforms for citizen engagement. International Journal of Information Management. Vol. 40. 2018. P. 17–20.

24. Mallan K. Gateways to digital participation: The rhetorical function of local government websites. In Foth M., Mallan K., Hughes H., Dezuanni M. (Eds.) Digital participation through social living labs: Valuing local knowledge, enhancing engagement. Chandos Publishing, United Kingdom. 2018. Р. 333–349.

25. Manoharan A. P., Ingrams A. Conceptualizing E-Government from Local Government Perspectives. State and Local Government Review. Vol. 50. N 1. 2018. P. 56–66.

26. Moon M. J. The Evolution of E-Government among Municipalities: Rhetoric or Reality? Public Administration Review. Vol. 62 (4). 2002. P. 424–433.

27. Omar A., Osmanaj A. The role of government regulations in the adoption of cloud computing: A case study of local government. The International Journal of Technology Law and Practice. Vol. 7. 2020. P. 1–20.

28. Pérez-Morotea R., Pontones-Rosaa C., Núñez-Chicharrob M. The effects of e-government evaluation, trust and the digital divide in the levels of e-government use in European countries. Technological Forecasting & Social Change. Vol. 154. 2020. P. 1–14.

29. Porumbescu G. A. Using transparency to enhance responsiveness and trust in local government: can it work? State and Local Government Review. Vol. 47 (3). 2015. Р. 205–213.

30. Rogers E. Diffusion of Innovations. 4th еd. Simon and Schuster, 2010.

31. Sandoval-Almazan R., Gil-Garcia J. R. Are government internet portals evolving towards more interaction, participation, and collaboration? Revisiting the rhetoric of e-government among municipalities. Government Information Quarterly. Vol. 29. 2012.

32. Streib G. D., Willoughby K.G. Local governments as e-governments: meeting the implementation challenge. Public Administration Quarterly. Vol. 29. N 1–2. 2005. P. 77–109.

33. Wirtz B. W. et al. E-government portal information performance and the role of local community interest. Empirical support for a model of citizen perceptions. Public Administration Quarterly. Vol. 40. N 1. 2016. P. 48–83.

34. World Bank. The e-government handbook for developing countries: The e-government handbook for developing countries: a project of InfoDev and the Center for Democracy and Technology (English). InfoDev. Washington, DC : World Bank. 2002.