The State and the Citizen: From Paternalism to Neopaternalism
https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2020-7-46-52
Abstract
In article historical aspects and a current state of system of mutual relation of the state and the citizen are analyzed. The novelty of the author’s approach consists in demonstrating the cyclic process: from civil paternalism to a social contract society and neopaternalism. The basic models of social support based on the degree of state intervention in the life of civil society and citizens are developed. A substantiated conclusion about necessity of social support not only not protected social groups, but all citizens of the state, transition from vertical to the horizontal social contract. Features of a formed Russian neopaternalism, its inconsistent character are specified. Necessity of forming of new system of mutual relations of the state and its citizens, based on trust and mutual responsibility of the parties is underlined.
About the Author
L. D. Kozyreva
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (North-West Institute of Management, Branch of RANEPA)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Larisa D. Kozyreva, Professor of the Chair of Social Technologies, Doctor of Science (Philosophy), Professor
Saint-Petersburg
References
1. Auzan A. A. Social contract and a civil society // World of Russia [Mir Rossii]. 2005. V. 14. N 3. P. 3–18. (In rus)
2. Kapelyushnikov R. I. Behavioral economics and the new paternalism [Text] preprint WP3 / 2013/03. M. : Publ. House of the Higher School of Economics, 2013. (In rus)
3. Kasavina N. A. The phenomenon of a decent life in the context of the problems of the social state // Questions of Philosophy [Voprosy filosofii]. 2019. N 11. P. 22–27. (In rus)
4. Public opinion – 2016. M. : Levada Center, 2017. (In rus)
5. Public opinion – 2019. M. : Levada Center, 2019. (In rus)
6. Pliskevich N. M. Paternalism and the processes of post-socialist transformation : Scientific report. M. : Institute of Economics, Russian Academy of Sciences, 2019. (In rus)
7. Rubinstein A. N., Gorodetsky A. E. State paternalism and paternalistic failure in the theory of trusteeship benefits // Journal of Institutional Studies [Zhurnal institutsional’nykh issledovanii]. 2018. Vol. 10. N 4. P. 38–57. (In rus)
8. Sidorina T.Yu. Social contract and civil society in a historical perspective and modern Russian realities // Economic Bulletin of Rostov State University [Ekonomicheskii vestnik Rostovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta]. 2007. Vol. 5. N 2. P. 118–128. (In rus)
9. Federal State Statistics Service [Electronic resource]. URL: https://www.gks.ru/folder/13397?print=1 (accessed: 20.04.2020). (In rus)
10. Chubarova T. V. Modern paternalism as a product of the mainstream: social problems, individual solutions // Social Sciences and the Present [Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’]. 2019. N 6. P. 27–39. (In rus)
11. Tsukanov S. S. Paternalism of the Russian state (IX–XIX centuries): historical and legal research : Dissertation abstract. Moscow, 2011. (In rus)
12. Saint-Paul J. The Tyranny of Utility. Behavioral Social Science and the Role of Paternalism. Princeton : Princeton University Press, 2011.
13. Sunstein C., Thaler R. Libertarian Paternalism Is Not an Oxymoron // University of Chicago Law Review. 2003. Vol. 70. P. 1159–1202.
14. Thaler R. H., Sunstein C. R. Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth and Happiness. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2008.
Review
For citations:
Kozyreva L.D. The State and the Citizen: From Paternalism to Neopaternalism. Administrative Consulting. 2020;(7):46-52. https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2020-7-46-52
Views:
387
Email this article 