Reflexive Governance as the Basis for Military Security in a Modern State

The purpose of this article is to substantiate the determinants of contemporary changes in military security policy, which is reflexive management. Military security is considered as a function of political attitudes and strategic decisions, and its governmental potential is a changing mechanism designed to meet regional and global demands and tendencies of society development. The author substantiates the assumption that today, the system of ensuring military security requires radical governmental transformation, and the key mechanism of this transformation is reflexive governance. The theoretical research method is a conceptual transformation of the governmental aspect of the military security policy through the prism of the theory of reflexive governance. The concept of reflexive governance has not yet been properly developed in Russian academic investigations, but its relevance is determined by a substantial change in the existing prospects for the analysis, development, and implementation of the military security policy in times of peace: (1) shifting the attention of civil cervants to the mechanisms of transformation of military security institutions to global challenges; (2) activation of discussions about “open” and “closed” spaces in politics; (3) development of the potential of governance based on continuous education and network management; and (4) development of a network governance system. Within the framework of reflexive governance, cognitive and normative beliefs form the political-administrative hierarchy and economic incentives as mechanisms for coordinating military security. At the same time, the mechanism of ensuring military security consists of such components as (1) subjects and (2) objects of military security; (1) normative and regulatory, (2) theoretical and research, and (3) activity components of military security. Reflexive governance, while becoming the basis of the military security in a modern state, implies that in the arms race countries should not forget about deeper, fundamental goals of state management. Any action both within the framework of direct provision of military security and within the framework of diplomatic regulation of relations in the international arena should be devoted to collective and individual-administrative reflexing of decision makers. A key role in military security policy should be played not by the theory of warfare, but by the development of tools to help resolve emerging conflicts peacefully.

1. Avksentiev V. A., Aksyumov B. V., Vasilchenko V. A. Ideological war against Russia: analysis of external and internal actors // Politex [Politeks]. 2017. V. 13. N 3. P. 40-56. (In rus)

2. Balashov A. I. Military potential and economic restrictions of the Russian army // National interests: priorities and security [Natsional’nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost’]. 2015. V. 11. N 34 (319). P. 46-55. (In rus)

3. Belozerov V. K., Soloviev A. V. Hybrid war in domestic political and scientific discourse // Power [Vlast’]. 2015. N 9. P. 5-11. (In rus)

4. Belozerov V. K. Military doctrine of Russia: at the beginning of the big path // Power [Vlast’]. 2015. N 2. P. 98-103. (In rus)

5. Gareev M. A. Threats of the modern world // National priorities of Russia [Natsional’nye prioritety Rossii]. 2014. N 1 (11). P. 8‒16. (In rus)

6. Ivanov V. V., Marcus A. C. Topogeodetic map of the XIX century // Army collection [Armeiskii sbornik]. 1999. N 9. P. 42‒45. (In rus)

7. Ivashov L. G. Peace on the fracture of history. Chronicles of geopolitical battles. M.: Book world. 2018. (In rus)

8. Kokoshin A. A. Some macro-structural changes in the world policy system: trends for the 2020‒2030s // Political researches [Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya]. 2014. N 4. P. 38‒62. (In rus)

9. Kucheryavyy M. Global Information Society and Security Issues // Power [Vlast’]. 2013. N 9. P. 91‒92. (In rus)

10. Lefevr V. A. Lectures on the theory of reflexive games. M.: Cogito Center, 2009. (In rus)

11. Makhonin V. A. State ideology and external wars: four centuries of Russian experience // Military thought [Voennaya mysl’]. 2011. N 5. P. 3‒18. (In rus)

12. Radikov I. V. Human security: reality or fiction? // Bulletin of Moscow University. Political science [Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Politicheskie nauki]. 2017. N 4. P. 6‒11. (In rus)

13. Radikov I. V. Military security of society and the state: Political analysis. St. Petersburg, 2017. (In rus)

14. Skulakov R. M. Territorial integrity of the state in the system of scientific categories and its methodological significance for military law // Military law [Voennoe pravo]. 2017. N 3. P. 13‒30. (In rus)

15. Smolyan G. L. Reflexive control — technology for making manipulative decisions // Proceedings of the Institute of System Analysis of the Russian Academy of Sciences. M.: Federal Research Center “Informatics and Management” of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2013. P. 54‒61. (In rus)

16. Toffler A., Toffler H. War and anti-war. What is war and how to fight it. How to survive at the dawn of the 21st century. M.: AST, Transit Book, 2005. (In rus)

17. Avant D.D, Finnemore M., Sell S. K. Who governs the globe? In: D. D. Avant, M. Finnemore, S. K. Sell (eds). Who governs the globe? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–32. 2010.

18. Beck U., Giddens A., Lash S. Reflexive modernization: Politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1994.

19. Buzan B., Ole W. et al. (ed.) Security: A new framework for analysis. Boulder : Lynne Rienner, 1998.

20. Daase C., Friesendorf C. Introduction: security governance and the problem of unintended consequences. In: Daase C., Friesendorf C. (eds.). Rethinking security governance: the problem of unintended consequences. London : Routledge, 1–20. 2010.

21. Innes M. Policing uncertainty: countering terror through community intelligence and democratic policing. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 605: 222–241. 2006.

22. Marsden T. From post-productionism to reflexive governance: Contested transitions in securing more sustainable food futures. Journal of Rural Studies, 29, 123–134. 2013.

23. Meadowcroft J. Environmental political economy, technological transitions and the state. New Political Economy, 10 (4): 479–498. 2005.

24. Rose N., Miller P. Political power beyond the state: problematics of government. British Journal of Sociology, 43 (2): 173–205. 1992.

25. Stirling A. Precaution, foresight and sustainability: Reflection and reflexivity in the governance of science and technology. In: Voß J.-P., Bauknecht D., Kemp R. (eds.), Reflexive governance for sustainable development (p. 225–272). Cheltenham : Edward Elgar, 2006.

26. Torgerson D. Reflexivity and developmental constructs: The case of sustainable futures. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning. 20 (6). 781–791. 2018.