Optimization of the Educational Expenses in the Municipal Districts
https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2020-9-62-80
Abstract
In modern conditions, the vast majority of municipalities in the Russian Federation are experiencing financial difficulties associated with a lack of incoming financial resources and a constant increase in costs. The key to improving the situation is to reduce costs and redistribute the released resources to activities aimed at improving the quality of public and municipal services provided to the population. Non-profit concession allows to combine efforts, finances, human potential and direct concentrated resources to solving priority problems. The purpose of the article is to confirm the hypothesis that the use of non-profit concessions will reduce the cost of providing education while maintaining or improving the quality of services provided to the population in this area. The results obtained in the course of the study can be used to increase the effectiveness of education systems in the municipal districts of all regions of the Russian Federation, and their individual elements will be suitable for use in similar purposes in towns.
About the Authors
E. V. Orlov
Kostroma State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Evgeniy V. Orlov, Associate Professor of Chair of Economy and Management, PhD in Economics, Associate Professor
Kostroma
A. A. Brut-Brulyako
Kostroma State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Aleksandr A. Brut-Brulyako, Associate Professor of Chair of Economy and Management, PhD in Economics, Associate Professor
Kostroma
References
1. Bykovskaia Iu. V. Socio-economic development of the Russian Federation: problems and prospects // Economics and management: problems, solutions [Ekonomika i upravlenie: problemy, resheniia]. 2017. Vol. 1, N 1. P. 8–15. (In rus.)
2. Katkova M. A. Institutional aspects of regional strategic planning // Bulletin of the Saratov state socio-economic university [Vestnik Saratovskogo gosudarstvennogo sotsial’no-ekonomicheskogo universiteta]. 2012. N 1. P. 26–29. (In rus.)
3. Kostroma region. Statistical yearbook. Vol. 1. Stat. sb. Kostroma : Kostromastat, 2018. (In rus.)
4. Lavrikova Iu. G., Bol’shakov A. L. The method of identification of “poles of competitiveness” in Russia // Economic analysis: theory and practice [Ekonomicheskii analiz: teoriia i praktika]. 2016. N 8. P. 55–64. (In rus.)
5. Some aspects of German regional policy — opportunities for Russia (2010) Bonn; Moscow: University book [Universitetskaia kniga] (In rus.)
6. Nusratullin I. V., Musin U. R. Management of social and economic development of Russia in modern conditions // Economics and management: scientifi and practical journal [Ekonomika i upravlenie: nauchno-prakticheskii zhurnal]. 2019. N 1. P. 4–7. (In rus.)
7. Orlov E. V. A nonprofi concession is a tool for “fi tuning” the development of constituent entities of the Russian Federation // Bulletin of Moscow university. Series 6. Economy [Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriia 6. Ekonomika]. 2019. N 1. P. 109–121. (In rus.)
8. Orlov E. V. Nonprofi concession: theoretical foundations and practical application. Yaroslavl : Filigree [Filigran’], 2017. (In rus.)
9. Orlov E. V. Management of the socio-economic development of the region: theoretical foundations, problems and solutions. Kostroma : Line-Graphic CJSC [ZAO «Liniia-Grafik»], 2015. (In rus.)
10. Polynev A. O. Interregional economic diff entiation: methodology of analysis and state regulation. M. : Editorial URSS, 2011. (In rus.)
11. Regions of Russia. Socio-economic indicators. 2018: stat. sb. M. : Rosstat, 2018. (In rus.)
12. Shavlova S. A. Trends in the socio-economic development of the Russian Federation: current problems and instruments of state regulation // Economics and business: theory and practice [Ekonomika i biznes: teoriia i praktika]. 2019. N 4–3. P. 188–197. (In rus.)
13. Shvetsov A. N. “Growth points” or “black holes”? // Russian economic journal [REZh]. 2016. N 3. P. 40–61. (In rus.)
14. Alkon M. Do special economic zones induce developmental spillovers? Evidence from India’s states // World Development. 2018. Vol. 107. P. 396–409.
15. Allam Z., Jones D. S. Attracting investment by introducing the city as a special economic zone: a perspective from Mauritius // Urban Research & Practice. 2019. Vol. 12, N 2. P. 201–207.
16. Bell T. W. When governments suspend their own rules // Reason. 2018. Vol. 49, N 10. P. 66–67.
17. Benzell S. G., Lagarda G. Can Russia survive economic sanctions? // Asian Economic Papers. 2017. Vol. 16, N 3. P. 78–120.
18. Bromley I. Urban economic development in a rural context // Economic development journal. 2017. Vol. 16, N 2. P. 19–23.
19. Dragoi A.-E., Balgar A.-C. Economic sanctions against Russia. A critical evaluation // Knowledge Horizons / Orizonturi ale Cunoasterii. 2016. Vol. 8, N 1. P. 63–67.
20. Frick S. A., Rodríguez-Pose A., Wong M. D. Toward economically dynamic special economic zones in emerging countries // Economic Geography. 2019. Vol. 95, N 1. P. 30–64.
21. Hajduga P. Special economic zones in the lower Silesia region as a regional development stimulator during the crisis // Research papers of Wrocław university of economics. 2014. Vol. 334. P. 56–65.
22. Herlevi A. Economic growth or sowing the seeds of destruction? The role of economic development zones in China // Journal of Chinese Political Science. 2017. Vol. 22, N 4. P. 675–689.
23. Hermansen A. “Special Exploitation Zones” or “Engines of Development” the role of the special economic zone and the maquiladora in the economic development of India and Mexico // Undercurrent. 2016. Vol. 12, N 1. P. 6–13.
24. Kleibert J. M. Exclusive development(s): special economic zones and enclave urbanism in the Philippines // Critical Sociology. 2018. Vol. 44, N 3. P. 471–485.
25. Korhonen I., Simola H., Solanko L. Sanctions, counter-sanctions and Russia — effects on economy, trade and finance // BOFIT Policy Brief. 2018, N 4. P. 3–23.
26. Piersiala L. The usage pattern of development method to assess the functioning of special economic zones: the case of Poland // Equilibrium. 2019. Vol. 14, N 1. P. 167–181.
Review
For citations:
Orlov E.V., Brut-Brulyako A.A. Optimization of the Educational Expenses in the Municipal Districts. Administrative Consulting. 2020;(9):62-80. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2020-9-62-80
Views:
413
Email this article 