Multifactorial Management the Development of Universities Innovative Educational Ecosystems
https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2020-12-149-164
Abstract
The article discusses the problem of multifactorial management the development of universities innovative educational ecosystems as a complex, multi-level educational community of participants acting within the framework of existing institutional norms and, at the same time, implementing development projects aimed at creating new social institutions. The methodology for managing the development of innovative educational ecosystems means a system of management principles, concepts, approaches and methods of managing an organization and personnel used in the processes of social self-organization and self-development of both the educational ecosystem as a whole and its individual participant. For a specific educational ecosystem, the set of methodological tools can be different, as well as their application at different organizational levels by different participants in the educational ecosystem. The methodology for managing the development of an innovative educational ecosystem makes it possible to determine the optimal set of processes for creating innovation-oriented methods of creating scientific and educational products or performing services within the framework of development projects characterized by the rapid development of prototypes within the framework of outsourcing and venture capital financing, trial marketing, compensation of costs for creation based on long-term "bonus", independence and autonomy of development teams. The success the development of the innovative educational ecosystem is determined by a number of factors: the sufficiency of funding and regulatory support; synchronized goal-setting in the primary and subsequent phases of development management; consolidation of efforts of business structures, government and universities; elimination of formal and informal institutional barriers; creation of favorable conditions and mechanisms for investing in the development of university innovative educational ecosystems; stimulating business structures in terms of using the scientific, educational and social potential of universities; state patronage in terms of the commercialization of innovations; integration of training with research, innovation and organizational activities at the personal level; promotion of innovations within the educational ecosystem and beyond. The success the
development of innovative educational ecosystems will be determined not by single decisions from the federal level or individual private initiatives of universities, teachers and students, but by ensuring all factors of the development of educational ecosystems in their systemic unity.
development of innovative educational ecosystems will be determined not by single decisions from the federal level or individual private initiatives of universities, teachers and students, but by ensuring all factors of the development of educational ecosystems in their systemic unity.
About the Authors
O. E. Permyakov
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (North-West Institute of Management of RANEPA)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Head of the Research Laboratory for the Development of Digital Education, Doctor of Science (Pedagogy), PhD in Technical Sciences
St. Petersburg
T. A. Pavlova
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (North-West Institute of Management of RANEPA)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Head of the Department for Quality and Development of the Educational Ecosystem, PhD in Physics and Mathematics
St. Petersburg
References
1. Vartanova L. A. Sources of financing for small innovative companies (start-ups) // Global Markets and Financial Engineering [Global'nye rynki i finansovyi inzhiniring]. 2017. N 2. P. 83–96. (In rus)
2. Gritsenko Y. B., Zhukovsky O. I., Senchenko P. V. Features of the transition of the enterprise to the program-target method of management // Reports of TUSUR [Doklady TUSUR]. 2015. N 1 (35). P. 123–127. (In rus)
3. Ignatov I. American Research University as an organizational innovation. 2015. URL: https://ruskline.ru/opp/2015/noyabr/23/amerikanskij_issledovatelskij_universitet_kak_organizacionnaya_innovaciya (date accessed: 10.20.2020). (In rus)
4. Kotler F., Berger R., Bickhoff N. Strategic management for Kotler. Best Practices and Techniques = The Quintessence of Strategic Management: What You Really Need to Know to Survive in Business. M.: Alpina Publisher, 2012. 144 p. (In rus)
5. Kryukov V. V., Lugovoy R. A., Soldatova Yu. A., Shahgeldyan K. I. Development of the Strategic Development Program of the University: Requirements, Indicators, Process // University Management: Practice and Analysis [Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz]. 2012. N 4. P. 16–25. (In rus)
6. Lesovskiy B. F., Lesovskaya O. V. Venture financing, the basis of innovative activities of economic societies of universities // Scientific works of Dalrybvtuz [Nauchnye trudy Dal'rybvtuza]. 2010. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/venchurnoe-finansirovanie-osnova-innovatsionnoydeyatelnosti-hozyaystvennyh-obschestv-vuzov (date accessed: 10.12.2020). (In rus)
7. Liferov A. P. Organization of scientific research in the universities of the United States of America // Bulletin of the Ryazan State University [Vestnik Ryazanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. S. A. Esenina]. 2007. N 17. P. 3–20. (In rus)
8. Body of knowledge on business process management: BPM CBOK 3.0 = BPM CBOK Version 3.0. Guide to the Business Process Management Common Body of Knowledge. M.: Alpina Publisher, 2016. 480 p. (In rus)
9. Timonina I. L. University startups and ventures and the country's competitiveness: the experience of Japan // Japanese Research [Yaponskie issledovaniya]. 2018. N 4. P. 92–110. (In rus)
10. Chubik P. S., Mogilnitsky S. B., Zamyatin S. V., Chubik M. P., Slesarenko I. V. Resource Efficiency Development Program of the National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University // University Management: Practice and Analysis [Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz]. 2013. N 3 (85). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/programma-razvitiya-resursoeffektivnosti-natsionalnogoissledovatelskogo-tomskogo-politehnicheskogo-universiteta (date of access: 09.28.2020). (In rus)
11. Chubik P. S., Mogilnitskiy S. B., Leader A. M., Yakovlev A. N., Slesarenko I. V. Comprehensive development program of the National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University // University Management: Practice and Analysis [Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz]. 2011. N 4. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/kompleksnaya-programma-razvitiya-natsionalnogo-issledovatelskogo-tomskogo-politehnicheskogo-universiteta (date accessed: 09.28.2020). (In rus)
12. Pokholkov Yu. P., Chuchalin A. I., Agranovich B. L., Mogilnutsky S. B. Ranking of Russian Higher Education Institutions // Higher Education in Europe. 2007. Vol. 32, N 1, Apr. P. 31–47.
13. Stolterman, Erik; Croon Fors, Anna (2004). Information Technology and the Good Life. Information systems research: relevant theory and informed practice. P. 689.
Supplementary files
Review
For citations:
Permyakov O.E., Pavlova T.A. Multifactorial Management the Development of Universities Innovative Educational Ecosystems. Administrative Consulting. 2020;(12):149-164. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2020-12-149-164
Views:
394
Email this article 