Legends and Myths of Online Testing: The Truth is Out There
https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2020-10-124-134
Abstract
The article discusses the prospects of the remote format for assessing competencies through a comparative analysis with the development of classical chess, concludes that it is necessary to rethink the role and place of online testing.
About the Authors
V. Yu. Grigorev
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Valery Yu. Grigorev, Leading researcher of the Center of Economics, in Technical Sciences, Associate Professor, Laureate of the President of the Russian Federation Award in the Field of Education
Moscow
S. E. Novikova
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Svetlana E. Novikova, Associate research fellow
Moscow
References
1. Dobrinskaya D. E., Martynenko T. S. Perspectives of the Russian Information Society: Digital Divide Levels // RUDN Journal of Sociology [Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Sotsiologiya]. 2019. N 1. P. 108–120. (In rus)
2. King C. G., Guyette R. W., Piotrowski C. Online exams and cheating: An empirical analysis of business students’ views // The Journal of Educators Online. 2009. N 6 (1). P. 1–11.
3. Fask A., Englander F., Wang Z. Do online exams facilitate cheating? An experiment designed to separate out possible cheating from the effect of the online test taking environment // Journal of Academic Ethics. 2014. N 12 (2). P. 101–112.
Review
For citations:
Grigorev V.Yu., Novikova S.E. Legends and Myths of Online Testing: The Truth is Out There. Administrative Consulting. 2020;(10):124-134. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2020-10-124-134
Views:
785
Email this article 