Background of Finland's Choice for NATO Membership (Historical Aspect)
https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2020-12-40-48
Abstract
Discussions about Finland's accession to NATO began in the late twentieth century. The greatest activity on the issue of Finland's membership in the Alliance was the country's accession to the European Union. Finland has stepped up cooperation with NATO in various forms, ranging from arms purchases to participation in peacekeeping operations. At present, Finland is trying to find new ways to ensure its own security.
Keywords
About the Authors
A. M. Muller
Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Senior Lecturer at the Higher School of International Relations
Saint-Petersburg
S. N. Pogodin
Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Director of Higher School of International Relations, Doctor of Science (History), Professor
Saint-Petersburg
References
1. Boldyreva E. L. Finnish security policy at the present stage // International relations and dialogue of cultures / ed. I. D. Osipov, S. N. Pogodin. St. Petersburg: Publishing House of Polytechnic University, 2011. P. 115–127. (In rus)
2. Deryabin Yu. S. Is everything so calm in the north of Europe? // Northern Europe. 2003. N 4 (16). P. 68–79. (In rus)
3. Deryabin Yu. S. Finland and NATO // International Life. 2007. N 7-8. P. 102. (In rus)
4. Mezhevich N. M., Novikova I. N. Finland and NATO: how forgetting the lessons of the past can lead to their repetition // Administrative consulting. 2016. N 4 (88). P. 27–39. (In rus)
5. Meinander H. History of Finland. M. : The Whole World, 2008. (In rus)
6. Pesonen P., Riihinen O. Dynamic Finland / Pertti Pesonen, Olavi Riihinen; translation A. Rupasov; Institute of Russia and Eastern Europe, Helsinki, St. Petersburg Institute of history of the Russian Academy of Sciences. St. Petersburg : European House, 2007. 383 p. (In rus)
7. Jussila O., Hentila S., Nevakivi J. Political history of Finland. 1809–2009. M.: The Whole World,
8. (In rus)
9. Golts A. The protectors of Putin’s vertical [Electronic resource]. URL: http://www.fiia.fi/fi/publication/207/protectors_of_putin_s_vertical/.
10. Iso-Markku T. The EU as a source of security [Electronic resource]. URL: http://www.fiia.fi/en/publication/484/the_eu_as_a_source_of_security/.
11. Kontinen J. Miehet Putinin takana — HS selvitti, kenellä on valta Kremlissä [Electronic resource]. URL: http://www.hs.fi/sunnuntai/a1426833140002.
12. McNamara M. E., Nordenman M., Salonius-Pasternak C. Nordic-Baltic Security and US foreign policy: a durable transatlantic link [Electronic resource]. URL: http://www.fiia.fi/fi/publication/515/nordic-baltic_security_and_us_foreign_policy/.
13. Pursiainen C., Saari S. Et tu Brute! Finland’s NATO option and Russia [Electronic resource].
14. URL: http://kms2.isn.ethz.ch/serviceengine/Files/ESDP/10734/ipublicationsdocument_singledocument/4e35ada3-fd0e-4856-9528-467ob84ca24c/en/doc_10765-290-en.pdf.
15. Raik K., Aaltola M., Pynnomiemi K., Salonius-Pasternak C. Pushed together by external forces [Electronic resource]. URL: http://www.fiia.fi/fi/publication/473/pushed_together_by_external_forces/.
16. Rasc A., Pynnöniemi K. Threat perception affects operational doctrines: Russia’s new national security strategy does not provide much hope for cooperation [Electronic resource]. URL: http://www.fiia.fi/fi/publication/561/threat_perception_affects_operational_doctrines/.
17. Roberts S. Russia’s pressure politics: The Kremlin’s uncompromising approach threatens political stability [Electronic resource]. URL: http://www.fiia.fi/fi/publication/301/russia_s_pressure_politics/.
18. Salonis-Pasternak C. The Swedish defence policy paradox [Electronic resource]. URL: http://www.fiia.fi/fi/publication/576/the_swedish_defence_policy_paradox/.
19. Rajamäki T. Presidentti Niinistö: Putinin tavoite on ylläpitää epävakautta [Electronic resource]. URL: http://www.hs.fi/ulkomaat/a1423277124444.
Review
For citations:
Muller A.M., Pogodin S.N. Background of Finland's Choice for NATO Membership (Historical Aspect). Administrative Consulting. 2020;(12):40-48. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2020-12-40-48
Views:
670
Email this article 