Вклад поведенческой экономики в теорию предпринимательства и ее использование в государственной политике в сфере предпринимательства
https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2021-1-50-60
Аннотация
Основываясь на междисциплинарном исследовании, статья доказывает, что поведенческая экономика вносит значительный вклад в теорию предпринимательства и может усилить эффект государственной политики, ориентированной на мотивацию предпринимательства. Статья демонстрирует, что предпринимательство — это явление, которое противоречит ряду неоклассических предположений, в то время как поведенческая экономика дает объяснения этим отклонениям и включает предпринимательство в модифицированные модели. Данные модели учитывают поведенческие аспекты предпринимательских решений. В статье определены три основные причины, из-за которых государственная политика в сфере предпринимательства имеет ограниченное воздействие: недостаточные знания о существующей политике, недооценка возможностей и перспектив предпринимательской сферы и важность нематериальных факторов в предпринимательском решении, которые не учитываются в существующих детерминантах предпринимательства, применяемых в государственной политике поддержки предпринимательства. В статье рассматривается возможность использования инструментов поведенческой экономики в государственной политике поддержки предпринимательства, основываясь на успешном опыте применения данных подходов в других сферах.
Об авторе
Н. П. Добрягина
Российская академия народного хозяйства и государственной службы при Президенте Российской Федерации (Северо-Западный институт управления РАНХиГС)
Россия
Россия
доцент кафедры государственного и муниципального управления,
Санкт-Петербург
Список литературы
1. Adomaсo S., Danso A., Uddin M. and Damoah J. O. Entrepreneurs’ optimism, cognitive style and persistence //International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research. 2016. N 22 (1). P. 84–108.
2. Ahmad N. and Hoffman A. A Framework for Addressing and Measuring Entrepreneurship // OECD Statistics Working Paper N 2. 2008.
3. Algate F. ‘You have been selected’: Driving uptake of government schemes. [An electronic resource] // Behavioural Insights Team Blog. 2015. URL: http://www.behaviouralinsights.co.uk/trial-results/you-have-been-selected-driving-uptake-of-government-schemes (date of the address: 05/08/2019).
4. Asterbo T., Herz H., Nanda R., Weber A. Seeking the roots of entrepreneurship: Insights from Behavioural Economics // Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2014. N 28 (3). P. 49–70.
5. Audretsch D., Grilo I., Thurik R. Handbook of research on entrepreneurship Policy. London: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2007.
6. Banerjee A. V., Newman A. F. Occupational choice and the process of development // Journal of Political Economy. 1993. N 101. P. 274–298.
7. Barr M.S., Mullainathan S., Shafir E. Behaviorally informed regulation. In behavioral foundations of public policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2013.
8. Bazerman M., Moore A. Judgment in managerial decision making. New York: Wiley, 2012.
9. Bell C. Inside the coalition’s controversial ‘Nudge Unit’ [An electronic resource] // The Telegraph. 2013. URL: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/9853384/Inside-the-Coalitions-controversial-Nudge-Unit.html (date of the address: 23.06.2018).
10. Benartzi S., Thaler R. Heuristics and biases in retirement savings behavior // Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2007. N 21 (3). P. 81–104.
11. Brundin E., Gustafsson V. Entrepreneurs’ decision making under different levels of uncertainty: the role of emotions // International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research. 2013. N 19 (6). P. 568–591.
12. Calvo G., Wellisz S. Technology, entrepreneurship and firm size // Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1980. N 95. P. 663–677.
13. Camerer C. Behavioural Economics: past, present and future // Advances in Behavioural Economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004.
14. Cartwright E. Behavioural Economics. New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, 2011.
15. Cooper A., Woo C., Dunkelberg W. Entrepreneurs perceived chances for success // Journal of Business Venturing. 1998. N 3 (2). P. 97–108.
16. Costa S. F., Caetano A., Santos S. C. Entrepreneurship as a career option: do temporary workers have the competencies, intention and willingness to become entrepreneurs? // The Journal of Entrepreneurship. 2016. N 25 (2). P. 129–154.
17. Cuervo A., Ribeiro D., Roig S. Entrepreneurship. Concepts, theory and perspective. New York: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2007.
18. Dobryagina N. Decision theory application in agricultural entrepreneurship promotion. Working Paper. Sapienza Universita di Roma, 2017.
19. Dobryagina N. Agricultural entrepreneurship motivation policies: European Union experience and decision theory application // International Journal of Rural Management. 2019. N 15 (1). P. 97–115.
20. Fursdon D. We need to get young people excited about farming [An electronic resource] // The Guardian. 2013. URL: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/aug/16/youngpeople-farming-future-agriculture (date of the address: 20.06.2019).
21. Gabaiz X. A Sparsity-based model of bounded rationality // The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 2014. P. 1661–1710.
22. Goyens M. Using behavioural economics for rather than against consumers — a practitioner’s perspective // Intereconomics. 2018. N 53 (1). P. 12–17.
23. Green D. Who wants to farm? Hardly any young people, it seems. Should/Could that change? [An electronic resource] // From Poverty to Power. Oxfam. 2014. URL: https://oxfamblogs.org/ fp2p/who-wants-to-farm-hardly-any-young-people-it-seems-shouldcould-that-change/ (date of the address: 17.07.2019)
24. Hamilton B. H. Does entrepreneurship pay? An empirical analysis of the returns to self-employment // Journal of Political Economy. 2000. N 108 (2). P. 604–631.
25. Hausman D. Nudging and other ways of steering choices // Intereconomics. 2018. N 53 (1). P. 17–20.
26. Herath G., Prato T. Using multi-criteria decision analysis in natural resource management. New York: Routledge, 2016.
27. Holm H. J., Opper S., Nee V. Entrepreneurs under uncertainty: an economics experiment in China // Management Science. 2013. No 59 (7). P. 1671–1687.
28. Hurst E., Pugsley B. What do small businesses do? // Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. 2011. N 43(2). P. 73–142.
29. Irawati D. Handbook of research on entrepreneurship policy // International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research. 2008. N 14 (4). P. 263–266.
30. Isiwu P. I., Onwuka I. Psychological factors that influences entrepreneurial intention among women in Nigeria: a study based in south east Nigeria // The Journal of Entrepreneurship. 2017. N 26 (2). P. 176–195.
31. Kahneman D., Tversky A. Prospect Theory: an analysis of decision under risk // Econometrica. 1979. N 47 (2). P. 263–291.
32. Keeney R., Raiffa H. Decisions with Multiple Objectives. New York: Wiley, 1976.
33. Kihlstrom R. E., Laffont J. J. A general equilibrium Entrepreneurial Theory of firm formation based on risk aversion // Journal of Political Economy. 1979. N 87. P. 719–749.
34. Kirzner I. Perception, opportunity and profit. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1979.
35. Knight F. M. Risk, Uncertainty and profit. New York: Houghton-Mifflin, 1921.
36. Kotler N. Sharing innovation. Global perspective on food, agriculture and rural development”. New York: Smithsonian Institutions Press, 1990.
37. Krawczyk M. Are we all overconfident in the long run? Evidence from one million marathon participants // Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. 2017. N 30(3). P. 719–730.
38. Krueger N. F. The cognitive infrastructure of opportunity emergence // Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 2000. N 24 (3). P. 5–23.
39. Leavy J., Hossain N. Who wants to farm? Youth aspirations, opportunities and rising food prices // Institute of Development Studies. 2014. N 439. P. 1–44.
40. List J. Neoclassical theory versus prospect theory: evidence from the marketplace // Econometrica. 2004. N 72. P. 615–625.
41. Loewenstein G., Prelec D. Preferences over sequences of outcomes // Psychological Review. 1993. N 100. P. 91–108.
42. Lucas R. On the Size Distribution of Business Firms // The Bell Journal of Economics. 1978. N 9 (2). P. 508–523.
43. Ma C., Gu J., Liu H. Entrepreneurial passion and organizational innovation: the moderating role of the regulatory focus of entrepreneurs // Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship. 2017. N 22 (3). P. 1–19.
44. Millan J. M., Congregado E., Concepción R. Persistence in entrepreneurship and its implications for the European entrepreneurial promotion policy// Journal of Policy Modeling. 2014. N 36 (1). P. 83–106.
45. Moore D., Healy P. J. The trouble with overconfidence // Psychological Review. 2008. N 115 (2). P. 502–517.
46. Parker S. C. The Economics of entrepreneurship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
47. Peters R. Rural Entrepreneurship // EU Rural Review. The Magazine from the European Network for Rural Development. 2012. N 10.
48. Salisu I., Hashim N., Galadanchi A. H. Entrepreneurial career resilience and entrepreneurial career success: Does entrepreneurial career commitment matter? // Management Science Letters. 2019a. N 9 (1). P. 73–90.
49. Salisu I., Hashim N., Galadanchi A. H. Social capital and entrepreneurial career resilience: The role of entrepreneurial career commitment // Management Science Letters. 2019b. N 9 (1). P. 139–154.
50. Sapinn E. (2016) 7 ways entrepreneurs Drive Economic Development” [An electronic resource] // Entrepreneur. URL: https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/283616 (date of the address: 07/08/2019).
51. Sarfati G. Do public policies for entrepreneurship make a difference? Prospective scenarios for Canada, Ireland and Italy // Future Studies Research Journal. 2012. N 4 (1). P. 114–139.
52. Schumpeter J. A. The theory of economic development. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1934.
53. Shane S. A. Fool’s gold? The truth behind angel investing in America. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
54. Shane S., Venkataraman S. The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research // The Academy of Management Review. 2000. N 25 (1). P. 217–226.
55. Simon H. A behavioural model of rational choice // Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1955. N 69. P. 99–118.
56. Smith A., Marshall L. Confidently biased: comparisons with anchors bias estimates and increase confidence // Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. 2017. N 30 (3). P. 731–743.
57. Subramanian C.R. ‘Nudge’ back in fashion at White House . [An electronic resource] // Time Swampland Blog, 2013. URL: http://swampland.time.com/2013/08/09/nudge-back-in-fashionat-white-house/ (date of the address: 03/08/2019).
58. Sulaiman N., Abdullah A. Factors that influence the interest of youths in Agricultural Entrepreneurship // International Journal of Business and Social Science. 2013. N 4 (3). P. 288–302.
59. Sullivan P. Estimation of an occupational choice model when occupations are misclassified// The Journal of Human Resources. 2009. N 44 (2). P. 495–535.
60. Sunstein C.R., Reisch L. A. Behavioral economics and public opinion // Intereconomics. 2018. N 53 (1). P. 5–7.
61. Swartz E., Amatucci F. Framing second generation gender bias: implications for women’s entrepreneurship // Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship. 2018. N 23 (2). P. 1–17.
62. Thaler R., Sunstein C. Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth and happiness. New Have: Yale University Press, 2008.
63. Tombu M., Mandel D. When does framing influence preferences, risk perceptions, and risk attitudes? The explicated valence account // Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. 2015. N 28 (5). P. 464–476.
64. Troussard X., Bavel R. How can behavioral insights be used to improve EU policy? // Intereconomics. 2018. N 53 (1). P. 8–12.
65. Tykocinski O., Amir I., Ayal S. Embracing chance tactically: a different perspective on risk taking // Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. 2017. N 30 (3). P. 683–692.
66. Wiklund J., Davidsson P., Audretsch D., Karlsson C. The future of entrepreneurship research // Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 2011. N 35(1). P. 1–9.
67. Wit G. Models of self-employment in a competitive in a competitive market // Journal of Economic Surveys. 1993. N 7. P. 367–397.
Рецензия
Для цитирования:
Добрягина Н.П. Вклад поведенческой экономики в теорию предпринимательства и ее использование в государственной политике в сфере предпринимательства. Управленческое консультирование. 2021;(1):50-60. https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2021-1-50-60
For citation:
Dobryagina N.P. Behavioural Economics Contribution to the Entrepreneurship Theory and its Application in Entrepreneurship Policies. Administrative Consulting. 2021;(1):50-60. https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2021-1-50-60
Просмотров:
682
Контент доступен под лицензией Creative Commons «Attribution-ShareAlike» («Атрибуция-СохранениеУсловий») 4.0 Всемирная.
Послать статью по эл. почте 