Territorial Management in 2021: New Approaches to Traditional Solutions
https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2021-7-10-16
Abstract
Key approaches to territorial management known in the world have been tried (tested) in Russia since the time of the Moscow Principality. It is almost impossible to propose new ones, but previous practices are becoming new in signifcance. In the specifc economic and political conditions of 2021, several initiatives were announced and serious decisions were made regarding territorial administration in the Russian Federation. This proposal is devoted to this article.
About the Authors
V. A. Shamakhov
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (North-West Institute of Management of RANEPA)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Vladimir A. Shamakhov, Director, Doctor of Science (Economics), PhD in History, Professor
St. Petersburg
N. M. Mezhevich
Institute of Europe of Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Nikolay M. Mezhevich, Chief Researcher, Doctor of Science (Economics), Professor
Moscow
References
1. Abrosimov N. Management Balance of Russia // Economic strategies [Ekonomicheskie strategii]. 2000. V. 2, No. 6. P. 106–111. (In rus).
2. Drobizhev V. Z. The main headquarters of the socialist industry. M., 1966. (In rus).
3. Zubarevich N. V. Spatial development strategy: priorities and tools // Economic issues [Voprosy ekonomiki]. 2019. No. 1. P. 135–145. (In rus).
4. Kuznetsov S. V., Mezhevich N. M. Regional economic policy of the USSR: historical experience for new economic conditions // Economic revival of Russia [Ekonomicheskoe vozrozhdenie Rossii]. 2017. No. 2 (52). P. 97–113. (In rus).
5. Kuznetsov S. V., Mezhevich N. M., Razumovsky V. M. Some questions of assessing the role of the transport factor in the economic history of North-West Russia of the late XIX — early XX centuries // Economic history [Ekonomicheskaya istoriya]. 2020. V. 16, No. 2 (49). P. 101–111. (In rus).
6. Li Ke. Permissible imbalances and systemic optimization of China’s regional economy [Electronic resource] // Problems of management theory and practice [Problemy teorii i praktiki upravleniya]. 2002. No. 1. URL: http://vasilievaa.narod.ru/ptpu/11_1_02.htm (In rus).
7. Litovka O. P., Mezhevich N. M. Territorial and political organization of the Russian Federation — from the parade of sovereignty to the vertical of power // Economy of the North-West: problems and prospects for development [Ekonomika Severo-Zapada: problemy i perspektivy razvitiya]. 2007. No. 3 (33). P. 20–25. (In rus).
8. Mezhevich N. M., Bolotov D. A. National priorities in the economic and social strategy of the North-West macro-region: examples and practices of the Leningrad Region // Economy of the North-West: problems and prospects for development [Ekonomika Severo-Zapada: problemy i perspektivy razvitiya]. 2016. No. 1 (50). P. 146–156. (In rus).
9. Mezhevich N. M., Shamakhov V. A. Belarus and the Baltic States in the system of transit transport policy of Russia and China: a scientifc report. St. Petersburg: NWIM of RANEPA, 2019. 54 p. (In rus).
10. Ryazanov V. T. Economic development of Russia XIX–XX centuries. St. Petersburg, 1998. (In rus).
11. Shamakhov V. A., Mezhevich N. M. Strategy for the spatial development of the Russian Federation for the period until 2025: economic opportunities and managerial restrictions // Administrative consulting [Upravlencheskoe konsul’tirovanie]. 2019. No. 4 (124). P. 19–27. (In rus).
12. Shvetsov A. N. The role of the state in the transformation of socio-economic space // Spatial economy [Prostranstvennaya ekonomika]. 2015. No. 1. P. 38–61. (In rus).
Review
For citations:
Shamakhov V.A., Mezhevich N.M. Territorial Management in 2021: New Approaches to Traditional Solutions. Administrative Consulting. 2021;(7):10-16. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2021-7-10-16
Views:
403
Email this article 