The Analysis of Factors of Formation of the Modern System of Political Governance: Global, Regional and Local Levels
https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2021-7-107-115
Abstract
The relevance of the work is due to the growing influence of the processes of globalization and the need for a systematic and theoretical understanding of the interdependence of different levels of development and adaptation of the political system in the modern world. The situation of the COVID pandemic, which began in 2020 and demonstrated the dominance of global attitudes and rules over regional and local attitudes and rules, gives special relevance to this article. The purpose of the work is to clarify the essence and possibilities of applying system analysis to the process of public administration at the level of global integration, regional and local levels of public administration. At the same time, the essence of system analysis is not reduced to solving problems of management and decision-making on very complex problems, but a complete system and methodology for analyzing the adaptation practices of modern political systems at the global, regional and local levels is built. The author comes to the conclusion that it is the local level that is the basis for the formation of the modern political system, and it is worth focusing on it, and not on the global and regional levels, when carrying out certain political changes and transformations. The regional level is an add-on to the local level, and can include multiple local levels. The task of the regional level is to prevent conflict between multiple localities, to ensure their harmonious coexistence and development. Due to the spread of digitalization, the regional level loses its function as an intermediary between the local and the global. The global level of formation of the political system today, in turn, is an “umbrella” level. It appears as a categorical imperative of the political system, but it is not its mandatory guide or guide of development.
About the Author
A. D. Tumanov
MTER CTS; Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (North-West Institute of Management, Branch of RANEPA)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Andrey D. Tumanov, Commercial Director, Graduate Student
Moscowof
St. Petersburg
References
1. Blauberg I. V. Integrity problem and system approach. M., 1997. (In rus).
2. Gostev A. N., Demchenko T. S. Civil society: control over the activities of the state. M., 2011. (In rus).
3. Gutorov V. A. Modernization as a factor of sustainable development: some problems of theory // The problem of stability of political systems of the modern world: Materials of the International Scientifc Conference/edited by S. G. Yeremeev, I. I. Kuznetsova. M.: Publishing House of Moscow University, 2018. (In rus).
4. Inglehart R., Welzel C. Modernization, cultural change and democracy: the human development sequence. M, 2011. (In rus).
5. Manheim J., Rich R. Research Methods in Political Science. M., 1997. (In rus).
6. Sadovsky V. N. System Approach and System Analysis / I. V. Blauberg, E. M. Mirsky, V. N. Sadovsky // System Research: Yearbook [Sistemnye issledovaniya : ezhegodnik]. 1982. P. 47–64. (In rus).
7. Slatinov V. B. Transforming the priorities of political management of the state civil service of Russia in the situation of regime changes: from “reform” to “development” // Central Russian Bulletin of Social Sciences [Srednerusskii vestnik obshchestvennykh nauk]. 2017. V. 12. N 3. P. 165–176. (In rus).
8. Smorgunova V.Yu. Modern foreign social, legal and political discourse on civil society // News of the Herzev Russian State Pedagogical University [Izvestiya Rossiiskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. A. I. Gertsena]. 2004. V. 4. N 7. P. 243–258. (In rus).
9. Smotritskaya I. I., Chernykh S. I. Modern trends in the digital transformation of public administration // Bulletin of the IE RAS [Vestnik IE RAN]. 2018. N 5. P. 22−36. (In rus).
10. Shamakhov V. A. Resource saving strategy: development vs distribution (Russian agenda) // Administrative consulting [Upravlencheskoe konsul’tirovanie]. 2016. N 6 (90). P. 7–13. (In rus).
11. Shestopal E. B. Values of the Russian political process and the country’s development strategy // Political Research [Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya]. 2014. N 2. P. 61–71. (In rus).
12. Agnew J. Hegemony: The new shape of global power. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press, 2005.
13. Bozeman B. Public values and public interests: Countering economic individualism. Washington, DC : Georgetown University Press, 2007.
14. Coccia M. World-System Theory: A sociopolitical approach to explain World economic development in a capitalistic. Journal of Economics and Political Economy. 2018. 5 (4). P. 459–465.
15. Cox R. W. Structural Is.s of global governance. In Gill, S. (Ed.), Gramci: Historical materialism, and international relations. Cambridge, MA : Cambridge University Press, 1993.
16. Denhardt R. Trust as capacity: The role of integrity and responsiveness // Public Organization Review. 2002. N 2. P. 65–76.
17. Dodgshon R. A. Geography’s place in time // Geografska Annaler. 2008. N 90 (1). P. 1–15.
18. Falk R. Predatory globalization: A critique. Oxford, UK : Blackwell, 1999.
19. Farazmand A. The Future of Public Administration: Challenges and Opportunities — A Critical Perspective // Administration and society. 2012. Vol. 44. Is. 4. P. 487–517.
20. Goldfrank W. L. Paradigm regained? The rules of Wallerstein’s World-System method // Journal of World-Systems Research. 2000. N 6 (2). P. 150–195.
21. Goldstein J. Ideas, Interests and American Trade Policy. Ithaca : Cornell University Press, 1993.
22. Howlett M., Ramesh M., Perl A. Studying public policy: policy cycles and policy subsystems. 3 ed. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2009.
23. Janssen M., Estevez E. Lean Government and Platform-based Governance — Doing more with Less // Government Information Quarterly. 2013. Vol. 30. P. 1–8.
24. Oberthür S., Stokke O. (eds.). Managing Institutional Complexity. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press, 2011.
25. Public Policy and Public Participation Engaging Citizens and Community in the Development of Public Policy. Bruce L. Smith / Groupwork Inc., Canada, 2003.
26. Sanina A., Rubtcova M., Satinsky D. M. The Effectiveness of Communication Channels in Government and Business Communication // Information Polity. 2017. Vol. 22. N 4. P. 251–266.
27. Wallerstein I. The rise and future demise of the World Capitalist System: Concepts for comparative analysis // Comparative Studies in Society and History. 1974. N 16 (4). P. 387–415.
Review
For citations:
Tumanov A.D. The Analysis of Factors of Formation of the Modern System of Political Governance: Global, Regional and Local Levels. Administrative Consulting. 2021;(7):107-115. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2021-7-107-115
Views:
723
Email this article 