Political Challenges of 2020 and their Implications for the Economic Model of the Republic of Belarus
https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2021-8-10-17
Abstract
The elections held in the Republic of Belarus in August 2020 and the subsequent development of the political situation have significantly increased the economic risks for the country’s national economy. However, forecasts related to a significant weakening of the economy did not materialize. The Belarusian economy can be called “garrison” or “mobilization”, but it has passed a unique test for peacetime.
About the Authors
V. A. Shamakhov
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (North-West Institute of Management of RANEPA)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Vladimir A. Shamakhov, Director of North-West Institute of Management, Doctor of Science (Economics), PhD in History, Professor
St. Petersburg
N. M. Mezhevich
Institute of Europe of Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Nikolay M. Mezhevich, Chief Researcher, Doctor of Science (Economics), Professor
Moscow
References
1. Vlasenko M. N. Assessment of the qualitative component of economic growth of the Republic of Belarus // Belarusian Economic Journal [Belorusskii ekonomicheskii zhurnal]. 2011. N 2. P. 100–110. (In Rus).
2. Gaidar E. T. Anomalies of economic growth [Electronic resource] // Economic issues [Voprosy ekonomiki]. 1996. N 12. URL: https://www.iep.ru/files/Gaidar/vopreco_12-1996.pdf. (In Rus).
3. Zhigunov D. I. Risks of the development of the “Dutch syndrome” for the economy of the Republic of Belarus // Economic growth of the Republic of Belarus: globalization, innovation, sustainability: materials of the XIV International scientific and practical conference (Minsk, May 20, 2021). Minsk: BSEU, 2021. (In Rus).
4. Kovalev M. M., Gospodarik E. G. Evolutionary changes in the Belarusian model of economic development in the VI five-year plan // Belarusian Duma [Belaruskaya dumka]. 2021. N 6. (In Rus).
5. Lizan I. Yu. Foreign economic relations and the agreed industrial policy in the Union State: why do we share what should unite? Scientific report / I. Yu. Lizan; N. M. Mezhevich, V. A. Shamakhov (scientific ed., foreshadowed.). St. Petersburg: NWIM of RANEPA, 2019. (In Rus).
6. Rudy K. V. Structural economic reforms: necessity for the Republic of Belarus and foreign experience // Belarusian Economic Journal [Belorusskii ekonomicheskii zhurnal]. 2015. N 1. P. 30–41. (In Rus).
7. Union State of Belarus and Russia: results for citizens and prospects / Gromyko Al. A., Rakhmanov S. K. and others; Association for Foreign Policy Studies named after A. A. Gromyko. M., 2021. (In Rus).
8. Tanzi V. Fiscal policy in countries with economies in transition. Washington: International Monetary Fund, 1993. (In Rus).
9. Transformation of economic models in the countries of the post-socialist world: Monograph / Ex. ed. M. O. Turaeva, L. B. Vardomsky. M.: IE RAS, 2020. (In Rus).
10. Tsarik Yu. Belarusian economy: achievements and limitations of “silent reforms” 2015–2017. Minsk, 2017. (In Rus).
Review
For citations:
Shamakhov V.A., Mezhevich N.M. Political Challenges of 2020 and their Implications for the Economic Model of the Republic of Belarus. Administrative Consulting. 2021;(8):10-17. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2021-8-10-17
Views:
434
Email this article 