Russia at the Turn of the World Economy
https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2021-8-43-55
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to determine and substantiate the importance of deepening cooperation between the Russian Federation and the countries of the Asian region in modern conditions. The work emphasizes and substantiates the importance of the development of integration processes in the formation of a strategy for international cooperation of states in the context of global socio-economic and political restructuring. The general world tendencies influencing the Russian economy in the conditions of a gradual transition to a new world economic order are given. The article examines the policy pursued by the state that can influence its place within the framework of the new integral world economic order. The paper describes the transformation and structure of relations between the member states of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) with the countries of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) in the context of the emerging concept of the Greater Eurasian Partnership and the change in the world economic order.
When preparing the work, first of all, we used a logical, factorial, statistical analysis, synthesis, a systematic approach.
The scientific novelty of the work consists in defining and describing Russia’s potential within the framework of the transition to a new world economic order, taking into account a combination of factors, namely: its position in the Eurasian Economic Union, the implementation of the Strategic Directions for the Development of Eurasian Economic Integration until 2025, the development of cooperation with the SCO and ASEAN states, as well as conjugation of the EAEU and the One Belt, One Road project.
About the Authors
D. E. MatreshinaRussian Federation
Daria E. Matreshina, Chief state customs inspector of Central Information Technology Customs Department, Postgraduate Student of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Moscow
A. A. Maryshev
Russian Federation
Alexander A. Maryshev, Chief specialist-expert, PhD in Political Science
Moscow
References
1. Ageev A. I., Loginov E. L., Bortalevich S. I. Great Eurasian Partnership: a project counter to the Trans-Pacific Partnership // Economic strategies [Ekonomicheskie strategii.]. 2016. Vol. 18. N 6 (140). P. 20–31. (In rus)
2. Aivazov A. E. Periodic system of world capitalist development // Kondratyev waves [Kondrat’evskie volny]. 2013. N 2. P. 84–123. (In rus)
3. Arrighi G. The Long Twentieth Century: Money, Power, and the Origins of Our Times. M.: Publishing House “Territory of the Future,” 2006. 472 p. (In rus)
4. Balatsky E. V. Concept of Capital Accumulation Cycles by G. Arrighi and its applications // Terra Economicus. 2018. Vol. 16, N 1. P. 37–55. (In rus)
5. Glazyev S. Yu. Conceptual proposals for the practical implementation of the Great Eurasian Partnership // Economic strategies [Ekonomicheskie strategii]. 2019. Vol. 21, N 1. P. 6–17. (In rus)
6. Glazyev S. Yu. World Economic Ways in Global Economic Development // Economics and Mathematical Methods [Ekonomika i matematicheskie metody]. 2016. Vol. 52, N 2. P. 3–29. (In rus)
7. Glazyev S. Y. Future world order from the current chaos // Plenary meeting. World development: problems of predictability and manageability. 2019. P. 66–73. (In rus)
8. Kefeli I. F., Kolbanev M. O., Malafeev O. A., Plebanek O. V. Project “Big Eurasia” in the context of interdisciplinary discourse // Eurasian integration: economy, law, politics [Evraziiskaya integratsiya: ekonomika, pravo, politika]. 2020. N 4. P. 88–102. (In rus)
9. Petrovsky V. E. Russia, China and the contours of the “Great Eurasian Partnership” // China in world and regional politics. History and modernity [Kitai v mirovoi i regional’noi politike. Istoriya i sovremennost’]. 2017. N 22. P. 37–51. (In rus)
10. Subetto A. I., Shamakhov V. A. Noosphere calling of “Great Eurasia” in the 21st century // Eurasian integration: economy, law, politics [Evraziiskaya integratsiya: ekonomika, pravo, politika]. 2020. N 4. P. 17–28. (In rus)
11. Entin M. L., Entina E. G. Comprehensive Great Eurasian Partnership: Leaving Reality or Returning to It // Вся Европа.ru. 2016. N 11(115). P. 1. (In rus)
12. Entin M., Entina E. Russia’s role in promoting Great Eurasia geopolitical project // Rivista di studi politici internazionali. Luglio-Settembre 2016. Anno 83. Fasc. 331. P. 331–352.
13. Li Xin. Chinese perspective on the creation of a Eurasian Economic Space // Valdai discussion club, 2016.
Review
For citations:
Matreshina D.E., Maryshev A.A. Russia at the Turn of the World Economy. Administrative Consulting. 2021;(8):43-55. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2021-8-43-55