Non-Institutional Forms of Political Participation of Muslim Youth in Modern Scotland

The article examines the main forms and socio-cultural features of the participation of Muslim youth in Scotland in non-institutional politics. As their research goal, the authors chose to identify the mechanisms through which political processes specific to the Scottish context (different from the general British or, for example, the English context) generate various forms of political participation of young adherents of Islam. The theoretical and methodological basis of the study was a significant layer of empirical data (mainly Scottish), comprehended through an interpretive paradigm, which allowed the authors to analyze the non-institutionalized political experience of young Muslims, finding patterns in how Muslim youth perceive and construct the social world around them. The result of the study was an understanding that the strengthening of the “Islamic factor” in the social and political life of Scotland is explained not only by the growth of the Muslim population, but also by the obvious support that the Scottish authorities provide to adherents of Islam. According to the authors, the issue of national and state independence, the specificity of Scottish nationalism, the attractiveness of the political platform of the Scottish National Party for ethno-confessional minorities became the most important primary factors that predetermined the active entry of Scottish Muslim youth into politics. The main conclusion in this article was the idea that the specific socio-political and sociocultural contexts of Scotland create appropriate forms of political participation of young Muslims. Despite the prevailing opinion that Scottish Muslim youth are interested mainly in international events, the authors show a clearly traceable institutional and non-institutional involvement of young Muslims in national and local political issues in Scotland. According to the authors, the non-institutional political participation of young Scottish followers of Islam is manifested in such forms as social movements, activism and charity, and volunteer work.

1. The Koran. Transl. I. Y. Krachkovsky. M. : Publishing House of Oriental Literature, 1963. 716 p. (In Rus).

2. Merkulov P. A., Tyurin E. A., Savinova E. N. The evolution of the SNP in the struggle for national self-determination in Scotland: on the issue of the peculiarities of Scottish “nationalism” // Power [Vlast’]. 2017. N 6. P. 153–159. (In Rus).

3. Turin E. A., Savinova E. N., Agababov A. R. The Islamic factor in the development of modern Scotland: political and socio-cultural aspects // Islam in the modern world: domestic and international political aspects [Islam v sovremennom mire: vnutrigosudarstvennyj i mezhdunarodnopoliticheskij aspekty]. 2020. Vol. 16. N 2. P. 159–180. (In Rus).

4. Turin E. A., Savinova E. N., Agababov A. R. The identity of Scottish Muslims as a socio-cultural manifestation of globalization in the internal political processes of modern Scotland // Administrative consulting [Upravlencheskoe konsul’tirovanie]. 2019. N 6. P. 60–63. (In Rus).

5. Altheide D. L., Johnson J. M. Reflections on Interpretive Adequacy in Qualitative Research // The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. Eds. N. K. Denzin, Y. S. Lincoln. London : Sage Publications. 2011. P. 381–411.

6. Beck U. World risk society as cosmopolitan society?: Ecological questions in a framework of manufactured uncertainties. Theory, Culture and Society. 1996. N 13 (4). P. 1–32.

7. Brookes R., Hodkinson P. Introduction — young people, new technologies and political engagement // Journal of Youth Studies. 2008. N 111 (5). P. 473–479.

8. Denzin N. K. Sociological Methods: A Sourcebook. Chicago : Aldine Transaction. 2006.

9. Hakim C. Research Design (2 ed.). London : Routledge. 2000.

10. Hammersley M. The Politics of Social Research. London : Sage Publications. 1995.

11. Holstein J. A., Gubrium J. F. The Constructionist Analytics of Interpretive Practice // The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. Eds. N. K. Denzin, Y. S. Lincoln. London : Sage Publications. 2011. P. 341–358.

12. Kimberlee R. H. Why don’t British young people vote at general elections // Journal of Youth Studies. 2002. N 5 (1). P. 86–98.

13. Kvale S. Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. London : Sage Publications. 1996.

14. Lewis J., Ritchie J. Generalising from Qualitative Research // Qualitative research Practice. Eds. J. Ritchie, J. Lewis. London : Sage Publications. 2003. P. 263–286.

15. Lincoln Y. S., Lynham S. A., Guba E. G. Paradigmatic Controversies, Contradictions and Emerging Confluences, Revisited // The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. Eds. N. K. Denzin, Y. S. Lincoln. London : Sage Publications. 2011. P. 191–216.

16. Lindsay C., Osborne S. P., Bond S. The ‘New Public Governance’ and Employability Services in an Era of Crisis: Challenges for Third Sector Organizations in Scotland, Public Administration. 2014. Vol. 92 (1). P. 192–207.

17. Maxwell J. A. A Realist Approach for Qualitative Research. London : Sage Publications. 2012.

18. O’Toole T., Gale R. Political Engagement amongst Ethnic Minority Young People. Basingstoke : Palgrave Macmillan. 2013.

19. Oslender U. Fleshing out the geographies of social movemnets: Colombia’s Pacific coast black communities and the “aquatic space” // Political Geography. 2004. 23. P. 957–985.

20. Pilkington H., Pollock G. Politics are bollocks: Youth, politics and activism in contemporary Europe // Sociological Review. 2015. N 63 (S2). P. 1–35.

21. Robertson R. Glocalization: Time-space and homogeneity-heterogenity // Global Modernities. Eds. M. Featherstone, S. Lash, R. Robertson. London : Sage. 1997.

22. Sandberg J. How Do We Justify Knowledge Produced Within Interpretive Approaches? // Organizational Research Methods. 2005. Vol. 8 (1). P. 41–68.

23. Sandelowski M. Qualitative Research, in M. Lewis-Beck, A. Bryman and T. Liao (eds), The Sage Encyclopedia of Social Science Research Methods, London: Sage Publications. 2004. P. 893-895.

24. Seale C. Quality in Qualitative Research // Qualitative Inquiry. 1999. Vol. 5 (4). P. 465–478.

25. Smidt C. (ed.) Religion as Social Capital: Producing the Common Good. Waco, TX : Baylour University Press. 2003.

26. Stepick A., Rey T., Mahler S. J. (eds) Churches and Charity in the Immigrant City: Religion, Immigration and Civic Engagement in Miami. London : Rutgers University Press. 2009.

27. Wilson J., Janoski T. The contribution of religion to volunteer work. Sociology of Religion. 1995. N 56 (2). P. 137–152.