Choice without Choice: Russia as a Trigger for a Change of World Order
https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2022-3-10-16
Abstract
Global instability as a factor in the change of world order increased gradually. The discussion about a new systemic crisis began already at a time when the world and Europe were still overcoming the consequences of the economic crisis of 2007–2009. However, we faced with not an economic and not even a political crisis, but a systemic destruction of the world order, which will no longer be restored. Ukraine has only shown that it is a weak link, where all global problems are integrated into a single whole and proposed for Russia’s solution.
Keywords
Russia,
Ukraine,
Europe,
USA,
world order,
crisis,
economy,
post-Soviet transit,
integration,
European Union
About the Authors
N. M. Mezhevich
Institute for Regional Economic Studies Russian Academy of Sciences; Institute of Europe of Russian Academy of Science
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Nikolay M. Mezhevich, Chief Researcher; Chief Researcher; Doctor of Science (Economics), Professor
St. Petersburg
Moscow
A. D. Khlutkov
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (North-West Institute of Management, Branch of RANEPA)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Andrey D. Khlutkov, Director of North-West Institute of Management — branch of the RANEPA; Doctor of Science (Economics), Associate Professor
St. Petersburg
V. A. Shamakhov
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (North-West Institute of Management, Branch of RANEPA)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Vladimir A. Shamakhov, Advisor to the Rector; Research Supervisor of the North-West Institute of Management — branch of the RANEPA, Doctor of Science (Economics), PhD in History, Professor
St. Petersburg
References
1. Borko Yu. A. Europe-XXI: further up or further down? [Electronic resource ] // European security [Evropeiskaya bezopasnost’]. 2011. N 26 (42). URL: http://rudocs.exdat.com/docs/index-564845.html (in Rus).
2. Gaidar E. T. State burden on economy // Economic issues [Voprosy ekonomiki]. 2004. N 9. P. 4–23 (in Rus).
3. Karaganov S. A. From constructive destruction to gathering // Russia in global politics [Rossiya v global’noi politike]. 2022. Vol. 20. N 2. P. 52–69 (in Rus).
4. Korejba Y. Integration projects in the post-Soviet space // Observer. 2012. N 6. P. 62–68 (in Rus).
5. Kuvaldin V.B. Globalization and the nation-state: yesterday, today, tomorrow // World economy and international relations [Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya]. 2021. Vol. 65, N 1. P. 5–13 (in Rus).
6. Liebman A. M. Political barriers to economic integration in the post-Soviet space // Journal of the New Economic Association [Zhurnal Novoi ekonomicheskoi assotsiatsii]. 2011. N 11. P. 175–178 (in Rus).
7. Lukyanov F. A. Old thinking for our country and the whole world // Russia in global politics [Rossiya v global’noi politike]. 2022. Vol. 20. N 2. P. 5–10 (in Rus).
8. Mezhevich N. M., Shamakhov V. A. After 30 years of post-Soviet integration. Why are losses noticeable and acquisitions not so obvious? // International life [Mezhdunarodnaya zhizn’]. 2021. N 12. P. 24–33 (in Rus).
9. Mises Ludwig von. Liberalism. M.: Economics: Society, 2001. 239 p. (in Rus).
10. White S., Light M., Louenhardt J. Belarus, Moldova, Ukraine: Towards East or West? // World economy and international relations [Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya]. 2001. N 7. P. 59–67 (in Rus).
11. Charap S., Shapiro D. How to avoid a new Cold War [Electronic Resource] // Russia in global politics [Rossiya v global’noi politike]. 14.10.2014. URL: www.globalaffairs.ru/ukraine_crysis/ Kak-izbezhat-novoi-kholodnoi-voiny-17041 (in Rus).
12. Kræslięš U. Latvia’s political development in the 20th century: from “democracy of views” and authoritarianism to “democracy of money” // Acta humanitarica universitatis Saulensis. Vol. 7 (2008). P. 35–43 (in Rus).
13. Sapir J. Is Eurozone accumulating a historic lag toward Asia in the COVID-19 context? // Journal of the New Economic Association. 2021. N 1 (49). P. 192–203.
14. Stark D., Bruszt L. One Way or Multiple Paths: For a Comparative Sociology of East European Capitalism // American Journal of Sociology. 2001. Vol. 106. N 4. November. P. 1129–1137.
Review
For citations:
Mezhevich N.M., Khlutkov A.D., Shamakhov V.A. Choice without Choice: Russia as a Trigger for a Change of World Order. Administrative Consulting. 2022;(3):10-16. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2022-3-10-16
Views:
322
Email this article 