Imbalances of Interests of Subjects of Economic Security at the Macro- and Meso-levels
https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2022-3-67-79
Abstract
The aim of the study was to consider from a managerial point of view the imbalances of interests of stakeholders within the regional space, aimed at identifying the interests of individual groups, as well as determining their impact on business development and strategic assets of the region. The research hypothesis is that the presence of conflict zones seriously affects the state of economic security and presupposes the adjustment of the existing strategic vector of the region’s economic development. Research methods — analysis of scientific literature and regulatory legal acts, synthesis. The results consist in proposing a conceptual model for managing the balance of interests in the system of ensuring economic security. It has been proved that a scientifically grounded system of interaction between subjects of the regional economy, taking into account the principles of harmonizing their interaction and the optimal combination of regional interests, will ensure the economic security of the region within the framework of the trajectory of socio-economic development of the region for a long period. Conclusions: when coordinating the interests of all economic entities, eliminating tense conflict zones, and implementing measures to neutralize threats to regional economic security, a significant amount of organizational and intellectual resources will be released, which were used in the struggle to realize their own interests by any means. With their targeted use, the vital interests of the region and municipalities will be more reliably protected, regional financial stability will be preserved, and external protection from the destabilizing effects of the external environment will be formed.
About the Author
A. V. Zatevakhina
Anatoly Sobchak International Banking Institute
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Anna V. Zatevakhina, Associate Professor of the Department of Economics and Finance of Enterprises and Industries, PhD in Economics, Associate Professor
Saint Petersburg
References
1. Bezdenezhnykh T. I., Sharafanova E. E. Financial security in the system of regional economic security // Izvestia of St. Petersburg State University of Economics [Izvestiya Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta]. 2019. N 3 (117). P. 32–38 (in Rus).
2. Bezrukov A. V. State and municipal power in the system of unified public power of Russia // State power and local self-government [Gosudarstvennaya vlast’ i mestnoe samoupravlenie]. 2015. N 6. P. 23–28 (in Rus).
3. Grabar V. V., Salmakov M. M. Analysis of interested parties of the project: methodology, technique, tools // Ars Administrandi. 2014. N 2. P. 36–44 (in Rus).
4. Zilberstein O. B. Analysis of stakeholders on the example of Russian enterprises [Electronic resource] / O. B. Zilberstein, K. V. Nevstruev, D. D. Semenyuk, T. L. Shklyar, A. V. Yurkovsky // Online journal “Science” [Naukovedenie]. 2016. V. 8, N 3. URL: http://naukovedenie.ru/PDF/42EVN316.pdf (case date: 21.09.2021) (in Rus).
5. Karginova V. V. Overcoming conflicts of interest of economic entities: the role of transaction costs: dissertation / St. Petersburg State University. St. Petersburg, 2015. 197 p. (in Rus).
6. Monitoring of the normative process of local self-government bodies with an illustration of typical violations of the rules of legal equipment using specific examples: practical manual / Collection: Atagimova E. I., Rybakova O. S., Troyan N. A. M.: FBI SCLI, 2018. 68 p. (in Rus).
7. Morozova V. K. The role of stakeholders in ensuring the sustainable development of the region // Science and practice of the regions [Nauka i praktika regionov]. 2018. N 2(11). P. 27–33 (in Rus).
8. Peshin N. L. New trends in municipal reform: redistribution of powers between levels of public power // Constitutional and municipal law [Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal’noe pravo]. 2016. N 12. P. 62–68 (in Rus).
9. Pyatakovich F. A. Multicriterial stakeholder analysis of investment innovation projects in the field of regional health care / F. A. Pyatakovich, V. I. Lomazova, K. F. Makkonen, V. G. Nesterov, E. V. Nesterova, T. I. Yakunchenko // Basic research [Fundamental’nye issledovaniya]. 2014. N 9-6. P. 1326–1330 (in Rus).
10. Santalova M. S. Theory of incomplete contracts in application to relations with stakeholders // Economics and entrepreneurship [Ekonomika i predprinimatel’stvo]. 2016. N 10 (3). P. 461–466 (in Rus).
11. Skvortsov P. V. Stakeholder model of company management: approach Account Ability [Electronic resource] // Corporate management. URL: http://www.cfin.ru/management/strategy/competit/AccountAbility.shtml (case date: 19.09.2021).
12. Tarasov A. V. Economic interests of economic entities: contradictions and ways of resolving them: contradictions and ways of resolving them: dissertation. Voronezh, 2006. 183 p. (in Rus).
13. Furta S., Solomatina T. The stakeholder map is a tool for analyzing the project environment and business in general // Initiatives of the 21st Century [Initsiativy XXI veka]. 2010. N 1. P. 22–28 (in Rus).
14. Donaldson T., Preston L. E. The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications. The Academy of Management Review. 1995. N 2. P. 61–71 [Electronic resource]. URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/258887 (case date: 21.09.2021).
15. Fayol H. Administration industrielle et générale. Paris. Dunod et Pinat. 1917. 174 p. [Electronic resource]. URL: https://gtmarket.ru/library/basis/5783 (case date: 21.09.2021).
16. Freeman R. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston : Pitman. Publishing, 1984 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Strategic-Management%3AA-Stakeholder-Approach-Freeman/5976eee5ff4f38b08c479586805010df1f0d1408 (case date: 11.09.2021).
17. Friedman L., Miles S. Stakeholders Theory and Practice // Oxford University Press. 2006 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/274641553_Stakeholders_Theory_and_Practice (case date: 21.09.2021).
18. Kuchumov A. V., Pecheritsa E., Chaikovskaya A., Zhilyaeva I. Digital transformation in the concept of economic security of Russia and its regions // Proceedings of the 2nd International Scientific Conference on Innovations in Digital Economy (SPBPU IDE ‘20). 2020 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349868724_Digital_Transformation_in_the_Concept_of_Economic_Security_of_Russia_and_Its_Regions (case date: 21.09.2021).
19. Mitchell R. K., Agle B. R., Wood D. J. Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts // Academy of Management Review. 1997. Vol. 22. N 4. P. 853–888 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/247159142_Toward_a_Theory_of_Stakeholder_Identification_and_Salience_Defining_the_Principle_of_Who_and_What_Really_Counts (case date: 21.09.2021).
20. Savage G. T., Nix T. W. Whitehead and Blair. Strategies for Assessing and Managing Organizational Stakeholders // Academy of Management Executive. 1991. Vol. 5. N 2. P. 61–71 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://www.academia.edu/35352360/Strategies_for_Assessing_and_Managing_Organizational_Stakeholders (case date: 21.09.2021).
21. Zaborovskaia O. V., Plotnikova E. V., Sharafanova E. E. Assessment of conditions for formation and development of human capital in the regions of the Russian Federation // Asian Social Science. 2014. V. 10. N 21. P. 267–274 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/287423747_Assessment_of_Conditions_for_Formation_and_Development_of_Human_Capital_in_the_Regions_of_the_Russian_Federation (case date: 21.09.2021).
Review
For citations:
Zatevakhina A.V. Imbalances of Interests of Subjects of Economic Security at the Macro- and Meso-levels. Administrative Consulting. 2022;(3):67-79. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2022-3-67-79
Views:
384
Email this article 