The Modern Russian Leader in the Representations of Civil Servants

The article analyzes the results of the study of the content and structure of public servants’ representations about the most characteristic personal and activity properties of modern Russian leaders. The relevance of the research is determined, on the one hand, by the requirements of modern management practice to the structure of personal and activity characteristics of managers at all levels and in any field, and on the other hand, by the significance of social representations as subjective factors in the formation of relations between participants in managerial interactions and increasing the productivity of their joint activities. A questionnaire based on the method of free descriptions was used as a diagnostic tool. When processing the received data, content analysis and a set of statistical methods were used. The concepts identified with the help of content analysis describe the personal and activity properties of the head, which act as subjective factors that contribute to or hinder the implementation of the functions of the head as a subject of management. The analysis and generalization of the research results made it possible to obtain a psychological portrait of a modern Russian leader from the position of civil servants. It is shown that the most characteristic for the modern Russian leader in the view of the study participants are personal and activity properties related to the spheres of goal-setting and goal-attainment, communication and interaction and subjectivity. The hierarchically organized structure of representations of civil servants about the most characteristic personal and activity properties of modern Russian leaders is described. It is established that the core of ideas includes seven characteristics of a modern Russian leader (purposefulness, competence, education, responsibility, ability to assume the function of a leader, determination, sociability), which are complemented by personal and activity properties included in the semi-periphery of ideas (authoritarianism, benevolence, charisma, fairness, activity, self-confidence, stress tolerance, demanding, honest). It is also shown that part of the periphery of the ideas of the study participants are personal and activity characteristics, which largely contradict those that entered the core and semi-periphery. The practical significance of the research is connected with the fact that the identification of the content and structure of ideas about the most characteristic personal and activity properties of modern Russian leaders opens up great prognostic opportunities for use in the framework of personnel work, as well as in the process of individual counseling of management personnel and psychological support of their professional activities. 

1. Avdonina O. S., Chistokhodova L. I. Effective leader in the sphere of municipal administration // Society: Sociology, Psychology, Pedagogics. 2021. № 12. P. 157–162. DOI: 10.24158/sPp.2021.12.23 (in Rus).

2. Alekseeva M. G. The image of a successful leader in the representations of commanders of the highest and middle level of railway transport // Collections of conferences of SIC. 2013. N 7. P. 112–115 (in Rus).

3. Barishovets E. M. Perfect portrait of the head of the educational complex // Power. 2019. N 6. P. 206–209 (in Rus).

4. Gadzhieva E. Y. Authoritarian management style during organizational changes // Bulletin of the Academy of Knowledge. 2017. N 22 (3). P. 71–75 (in Rus).

5. Glebova G. F., Alexandrova D. N. Teachers’s ideas of an efficient head of a modern comprehensive sсhool // Socio-psychological problems of mentality / mentality. 2020. N 16. P. 44–49 (in Rus).

6. Gololobova T. M. Features of a woman᾿s style company management // Vestnik Universiteta. 2021. N 12. P. 5–9. DOI: 10.26425/1816-4277-2021-12-5-9 (in Rus).

7. Derkach A. A. Acmeology: personal and professional development of a person. B. 1–5. Acmeological foundations of managerial activity. B. 2. M. : RAGS, 2000. 536 p. (in Rus).

8. Egorova Yu. A. The role of goal setting in the management system // International Journal of Applied and Fundamental Research. 2010. N 9. P. 91–92 (in Rus).

9. Emelyanova T. P. Social representations: History, theory and empirical research. Moscow: Publishing house “Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences”, 2016. 476 p. (in Rus)

10. Ivanov E. A., Lychagina S. V. Perceptions of junior commanders of the national guard forces command on the qualities of a leader of a military unit // Scientific opinion. 2018. N 11. P. 58–61 (in Rus).

11. Ishkov A. D., Miloradova N. G. Image of the ideal and the real head of the construction industry in the representation of subordinate specialists // Economics and entrepreneurship. 2014. N 8 (49). P. 427–431 (in Rus).

12. Kireev M. P. Goal setting in the management of internal Affairs bodies: theory and practice of physical culture // Proceedings of Management Academy of the Ministry of the Interior of Russia. 2020. N 2 (54). P. 54–61 (in Rus).

13. Kokorina L. I. Image of an executive as an element of creating the image of a public authority // International Research Journal. 2019. N 7 (85). Part 2. P. 76–78. DOI: 10.23670/IRJ.2019.85.7.043 (in Rus).

14. Korablin S. I. Features of the idea of a leader in groups with different levels of socio-psychological development // The territory of science. 2007. N 1. P. 126–132 (in Rus).

15. Mikhailova T. V., Balashkevich I. V. Research on gender aspects in management // Eurasian Union of Scientists. 2020. N 6 (75). P. 62–65. DOI: 10.31618/ESU.2413-9335.2020.3.75.836 (in Rus).

16. Nigomatullina R. M. Subjectivity in Modern Management // Manuscript. 2020. Vol. 13. N 12. P. 209–213 (in Rus).

17. Nikitin S. I. Personal Quality of the Head as a Factor of Group Coherence // Perspectives of Science & Education. 2018. N 4 (34). P. 256–264 [Electronic source]. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/lichnostnye-kachestva-rukovoditelya-kak-faktor-gruppovoy-splochennostikollektiva/viewer (accessed: 11.04.2023) (in Rus).

18. Novikov М. М. The Image of Ideal Leader as Seen by Employees of State and Commercial Enterprises // Proceedings of the Smolensk State University. 2013. N 1 (21). P. 412–417 (in Rus).

19. Petrov K. G., Alexandrova D. N. School principals’ views on the model of a modern effective head of a general education organization // Man and education. 2021. N 3 (68). P. 21–27 (in Rus).

20. Reutova V. I. Interrelation of managerial competencies with personal qualities of heads of internal affairs bodies // Man: crime and punishment. 2019. vol. 27 (1–4). N 3. P. 390–395. DOI: 10.33463/1999-9917.2019.27(1-4). 3.390-395 (in Rus).

21. Savin A. M. Social representations of youth about an androgynous male leader // Russia in the XXI century: strategy and tactics of socio-economic, political and legal reforms: Materials of the XIII All-Russian scientific and practical conference of students and young scientists dedicated to the 75th anniversary of Victory in the Great Patriotic War of 1941–1945. Barnaul : ABC, 2020. P. 512–513 (in Rus).

22. Selezneva E. V. Personality’s vital relations as a measure of its subjectivity // The world of psychology. 2012. N 2. P. 260–270 (in Rus).

23. Selezneva E. V. Representations about leader and manager: general and special // Bulletin of Moscow region state university. 2018. N 3. P. 183–194 (in Rus).

24. Selezneva E. V., Emel’yanova O. V. Features subject of civil servants // Acmeology. 2010. N 3. P. 62–70 (in Rus).

25. Semenkova S. N. Psychological portrait of a female leader // Science and modernity. 2014. N 27. P. 98–102 (in Rus).

26. Symaniuk E. E., Devyatovskaya I. V. Leadership power as a factor of enhancement or deformation of an organization leader’s identity // Human resources and Intellectual resources management in Russia. 2014. N 4 (13). P. 5–8 (in Rus).

27. Sysoev V. V., Lavrov N. N. Psychological features of professional communication between a supervisor and a subordinate // Psychologist. 2018. N 4. P. 32–37. DOI: 10.25136/2409-8701.2018.4.27203 (in Rus).

28. Tolochek V. A., Shpitonkov S. V., Palt E. A. “Vertical” arrangement of the space of managers’ business communication styles // Izvestiya of Saratov university. New series. Series: Educational acmeology. Developmental psychology. 2017. Vol. 6. Is. 2 (22). P. 126–133. DOI: 10.18500/23049790-2017-6-2-126-133 (in Rus).

29. Hrisankhova E. A. The image of a leader in the representation of employees of organizations with different types of organizational culture // Psychology of labor, organization and management in the conditions of modern technologies: state and prospects of development: materials of the International scientific and practical Conference. Tver : Publishing House “Tver State University”, 2020. P. 264–269 (in Rus).

30. Yarmak Yu. V. Goal-setting as the basis for the formation of communications in management activities // Space and Time [Prostranstvo i Vremya]. 2015. Vol. 9. Is. 2: Space and time of decision-making [Electronic source]. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/tselepolaganiekak-osnova-formirovaniya-kommunikatsiy-v-upravlencheskoy-deyatelnosti/viewer (accessed: 25.03.2023) (in Rus).

31. Abric J. C. Central system, peripheral system: their functions and roles in the dynamics of social representations // Papers on Social Representations. Textes sur les Representations Sociales (1021–5573). 1993. V. 2. N 2. P. 75–78.

32. Asad M. M., Sherwani F., Asad M. E. Distinctiveness And Characteristic of Competent Manager and Leader In This Advanced Epoch // New York Science Journal. 2014. N 7(4). P. 17–20.

33. Chiang Jack, Chen Xiao-Ping, Liu Haiyang, Akutsu Satoshi, Wang Zheng. We have emotions but can’t show them! Authoritarian leadership, emotion suPpression climate, and team performance // Human Relations. 2021. Vol. 74. N 7. P. 1082–1111.

34. Jodelet D. Représentations sociales: phénomènes, concept et théorie // Psychologie sociale. S. Moscovici (ed.). Paris : PUF, 1984. P. 357–378

35. Karaszewski R., Drewniak R. The Leading Traits of the Modern Corporate Leader: Comparing Survey Results from 2008 and 2018 // Energies. 2021. Vol. 14. N 23 [Electronic source]. https:// www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/23/7926 (accessed: 12.04.2023)

36. Moscovici S. On Social representations // Social cognition: Perspectives on everyday understanding / ed. P. J. Forgas. L., 1981. P. 181–209.

37. Raišienė A. G. Leadership and Managerial Competences in a Contemporary Organization from the Standpoint of Business Executives // Economics and Sociology. 2014. Vol. 7. N 3. P. 179– 193. DOI: 10.14254/2071-789X.2014/7-3/14.

38. Şleahtiţchi M. Values, Leaders and Social Representations // HSS. 2018. Vol. VII. N 3. P. 13–22. DOI: 10.2478/hssr -2018-0022.