Mentoring as a Social Institution and Its Types in Modern Realities
https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2023-10-179-187
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to consider and determine the features of the types of mentoring in modern realities.
The relevance of the consideration of this topic for the successful implementation of the individual’s activities in various fields, as well as within the framework of the revival of the institute of mentoring, is substantiated. The essence of mentoring as a social institution at the present time is analyzed. The factors that contributed to the change in the organizational and
content side of mentoring are described. The types of mentoring are presented and differentiated: tutoring, mentoring, coaching, facilitation, reverse mentoring, as well as forms of mentoring: individual and group. The scope of application of each type of mentoring is described. Based on the analysis of publications, the issue of mentoring functions in various fields is considered: supportive, diagnostic, developmental, communicative and mediative. Research methods include analysis, synthesis, generalization and classification of theoretical works. In the process of writing this article, we analyzed domestic and foreign sources, which allowed us to summarize the experience in this direction and identify the characterological signs of mentoring as a social institution in modern realities. The results provide a description of the specific characteristics of each type of mentoring in the context of modern times, a description of the functions of mentoring.
About the Author
I. A. Zorina
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (North-West Institute of Management of RANEPA)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Irina A. Zorina, Postgraduate student
Chair of Social Technologies
Saint Petersburg
References
1. Barsukov V. I. Media education: new books, articles, abstracts of dissertations // Media education. 2015. N 1. P. 113–122 (in Rus.).
2. Bespyatova V. V. Coaching in entrepreneurship. Sociological aspect // Collection of scientific articles on the results of conferences on entrepreneurship and banking law : Collection of materials of All-Russian scientific and practical conferences, Moscow, March 18–19, 2016 / general ed. A. V. Sharkova. M. : LLC “Publishing House “Sputnik+”, 2016. P. 6–8 (in Rus).
3. Vargasova N. Y. Mentoring in social networks as a type of pedagogical technologies // Bulletin of the Barnaul Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of. 2021. N 2 (41). P. 192–195 (in Rus.).
4. Zagorulya T. B. The concept of pedagogical facilitation: the concept and essence // XX International Conference in memory of Professor L. N. Kogan “Culture, personality, society in the modern world: Methodology, empirical research experience”. Yekaterinburg : UrFU, 2018, P. 900–906 (in Rus.).
5. Johannes D., Verena C., Susanna B. Tutoring and coaching as special forms of mentoring when entering the profession of young teachers (trans. from it. LN Danilova) // Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin. 2019. N 1. P. 56–69 (in Rus.).
6. Kiyashchuk T. V. Mentoring as a necessary condition for comprehensive support of a person in the educational environment of a modern university // Higher School: Experience, problems, prospects : Materials of the XIV Scientific and Practical International Conference, Moscow, April 15–16, 2021 / Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia. M. : Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN), 2021. P. 89–96 (in Rus.).
7. Korotaeva E. V. The possibilities of tutoring in the process of professional development of teachers // Scientific support of the system of professional development of personnel [Nauchnoe obespechenie sistemy povysheniya kvalifikatsii kadrov]. 2012. N 1 [Electronic source]. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/vozmozhnosti-tyutoringa-v-protsesse-povysheniya-kvalifikatsii-pedagogov (accessed: 20. 02. 2023) (in Rus.).
8. Danilova M. A., Frolova E. V. Coaching: origins, approaches, prospects. SPb. : Speech, 2003. 110 p (in Rus.).
9. Miraliev K. Systematization of conceptual approaches to the definition of the concept of “State” // Mündəricat-content. 2022. N 10. P. 98–121 (in Rus.).
10. Nazarova E. S. Mentoring as an interdisciplinary subject of research // Modern applied psychology: theory and practice. 2017. N 1. P. 88–93 (in Rus.).
11. Radostina N. B. Features of pedagogical mentoring in comparison with mentoring in other professional spheres // Strategic directions of education development in the Orenburg region: Scientific and practical conference with international participation, Orenburg, September 29, 2017. Orenburg : Orenburg State University, 2017. P. 591–595 (in Rus.).
12. Svinin A. Social networks: opportunities for search and selection of personnel // HR officer. Recruiting for a personnel officer. 2012. N 6. P. 186–189 (in Rus.).
13. Stashkevich I. R., Afanasyeva S. A. Modern forms of mentoring // Innovative development of professional education. 2021. N 1 (29). P. 147–171 (in Rus.).
14. Tarkhanova I. Yu. Socialization of youth by means of Internet communications // Bulletin of Kostroma State University. Series: Pedagogy. Psychology. Sociokinetics. 2017. Vol. 23. N 4. P. 169–171 (in Rus.).
15. Turkulets N. K. Formation of labor motivation and corporate behavior of employees of the organization on the socio-managerial technology of coaching: Dis. ... cand. social sciences : 22. 00. 08 M., 2006 151 p. (in Rus.).
16. Falyakhov I. I. Diversification of mentoring models: mentor, tutor, coach, facilitator and identification of their readiness to carry out mentoring activities //Kazan Pedagogical Journal. 2016. N 2–1 (115). P. 45–49 (in Rus.).
17. Dawson P. Beyond Definition: on the way to creating a framework for designing and specifying mentoring models //Researcher in the field of education. 2014. Vol. 43. N 3. P. 120–124.
18. Hoffman J. V., Wetzel M. M., Maloch B., Griter E., Taylor L., Deulio S., Khan Vlah S. What can we learn by studying coaching interactions between collaborating teachers and custodial teachers? Literature review // Procedia — Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2015. Vol. 52, P. 99–112.
19. Hudson P. Mentoring as professional development: “Growth for both mentor and ward” // Professional development in education. 2013 [Electronic source]. URL: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/19415257.2012.749415 (accessed: 20. 02. 2023).
20. James J. M., Rayner A., Bruno J. Are you my mentor? New perspectives and studies of informal mentoring // Journal of Academic Librarianship. 2015. Vol. 41 (5). P. 532539.
21. Kasprzhak A. G., Kalashnikov S. P. Development of models of academic bachelor’s degree and research magistracy within the framework of the program of modernization of pedagogical education: the first results // Psychological science and education. 2015. Vol. 20. N 5. P. 29–44.
22. Petrovska S., Sivevskaya D., Popeska B., Runcheva J. Mentoring in the teaching profession // IJCRSEE. 2018. N 2 [Electronic source]. URL: https:// cyberleninka.ru/article/n/mentoring-in-teaching-profession (accessed: 02. 03. 2023).
23. Santamaria J. O. Mentoring develops employees with high potential //Asia Africa Intelligence Wire. 2003. Vol. 4. N 1. P. 29–32.
24. Vitvar O. I. Modern content and methods of development of pedagogical mentoring in the system of general education of the Russian Federation // Pedagogy. Questions of theory and practice. 2019. N 2. P. 43–51.
Review
For citations:
Zorina I.A. Mentoring as a Social Institution and Its Types in Modern Realities. Administrative Consulting. 2023;(10):179-187. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2023-10-179-187
Views:
355
Email this article 