Implementing Scientific and Technological Territorial Potential Through Interregional Integration Based on the “Smart” Specialization Approach

Relevance and objectives of the research. Regional scientific and technological potential can be revealed and fully realized only taking into account the possibilities of interregional partnership and cooperation and provided that the priorities of scientific and technological development of the regions are aligned. The purpose of the article is to analyze the possibilities and prospects for using the “smart” specialization approach to the formation and development of interregional scientific and technological spaces.
Materials and methods. The methodological basis of the study was the general scientific methods of system analysis, abstraction, induction and deduction, analogy, modeling, specification, comparative and logical research methods. The special methods used were content analysis of literature, bibliometric, comparative geographical and others. The empirical basis of the study was based on data from the Federal State Statistics Service, the statistical information platform Statista, as well as individual strategic regulatory documents. The instrumental base for the analysis was made up of the VOSviewer program, version 1.6.20.
Results. The author analyzed and generalized theoretical approaches to the definition of “interregional scientific and technological integration”, presented the author’s understanding of “smart” specialization as a strategic approach to the development of regional structural and innovation-technological policies. Unique tools for using this approach are identified and described based on an analysis of European experience. The main barriers to the practical implementation of “smart” specialization in order to build effective interregional scientific and technological integration are analyzed (departmental inconsistency, the content and specificity of requirements for the targeted use of federal budget funds, fragmentation and multidirectionality of measures and instruments of state support, etc.), and key tools for its support are identified. The role of the state in the processes of building internal cooperation chains, the formation of interregional scientific and technological spaces in order to ensure the comprehensive implementation of regional potentials is revealed.
Conclusions. It is advisable to implement a unified scientific and technological policy that ensures the synchronization of actions of management subjects at different levels, which will require the elimination of departmental inconsistencies in its implementation, the establishment of uniform transparent principles and rules of the game, a verified system of economic incentives, and, in general, the creation of a high-quality institutional environment. In addition, for the purpose of scientific and technological development of regional spaces, it is necessary to constantly monitor the status and results of using various government support instruments with a view to their subsequent prioritization and linking “smart specialization” strategies with real support measures and distribution of subsidies.

1. Porfir’ev B. N., Shirov A. A. Key topics of the long-term socio-economic forecast for the development of the Russian economy // All-Russian scientific and practical conference “Socio-economic development of regions”, dedicated to the 300th anniversary of the Russian Academy of Sciences. [Vserossijskaya nauchno-prakticheskaya konferenciya «Social’no-ekonomicheskoe razvitie regionov», posvyashchennaya 300-letiyu Rossijskoj akademii nauk]. Saint Petersburg, 26 Fabruary. 2024. URL: http://www.iresras.ru/sobytiya/konferentsii/kon-26-02.html (accessed: 20.03.2024) (In Russ.)

2. Treyvish A. I. Time and space of Russian modernization: some lessons of history and geography. Regional studies [Regionalistika]. 2015. Vol. 2. N 1. P. 23-41. DOI: 10.14530/reg.2015.1 (In Russ.)

3. Kozhevnikov S. A. “Soft” factors of ensuring spatial integration of the northern regions of Russia / S. A. Kozhevnikov // Regionology [Regionologiya]. 2023. Vol. 31, N 1 (122). P. 87-106. DOI 10.15507/2413-1407.122.031.202301.087-106 (In Russ.)

4. Minakir P. A. Research of the problems of international economic interactions: global, national, regional aspects [Issledovaniya problem mezhdunarodnyh ekonomicheskih vzaimodejstvij: global’nye, nacional’nye, regional’nye aspekty] monograph / ed. V. P. Chichkanov; Economic Research Institute FEB RAS. Khabarovsk: IEI FEB RAS, 2022. 720 p. (In Russ.)

5. Kovtun R. V. Modern approaches to defining economic integration // Moscow Economic Journal [Moskovskij ekonomicheskij zhurnal]. 2020. N 11. P. 207–219. (In Russ.)

6. Shumilova Yu. A. Methodological aspects of the study of the category “economic integration” Metodologicheskie aspekty issledovaniya kategorii “ekonomicheskaya integraciya”] // Intelligence. Innovations. Investments. 2014. N 4. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/metodologicheskie-aspekty-issledovaniya-kategorii-ekonomicheskaya-integratsiya (accessed: 20.03.2024) (In Russ.)

7. Shanin S. A. Institutional imperatives of modern interregional integration // Economic problems of Russia’s accession to the WTO [Ekonomicheskie problemy vstupleniya Rossii v VTO]: materials of the international scientific and practical conference, Belgorod : Belgorod State National Research University, 2004. P. 312–316 (In Russ.).

8. Baklanov P. Ya. Integration and disintegration processes in the Russian Far East / P. Ya. Baklanov // Regional studies [Regional’nye issledovaniya]. 2002. N 1 (1). P. 12–19.

9. Suslov V. I. Coalition analysis and effects of interregional integration / V. I. Suslov, N. M. Ibragimov, L. V. Melnikova // Economy of the region Ekonomika regiona. 2018. Vol. 14, N 4. P. 1131–1144. (In Russ.)

10. Gontar N. V. Interregional integration in Russia: institutions and state-administrative regulation / N. V. Gontar // Bulletin of Volgograd State University. Series. 3: Economy. Ecology Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser. 3: Ekonomika. Ekologiya]. 2018. Vol. 20, N 3. P. 14–24. (In Russ.)

11. Kotov A. V. Territory requires coherent work: the role of interregional interactions in economic recovery (on the 100th anniversary of I. G. Alexandrov’s work “Economic zoning of Russia”) / A. V. Kotov // Spatial Economics Prostranstvennaya ekonomika]. 2021. Vol. 17, N 1. P. 18–34. (In Russ.)

12. Kozhevnikov S. A. Problems of Ensuring Spatial Integration of Russian Regions / S. A. Kozhevnikov // Scientific Works of the Free Economic Society of Russia [Nauchnye trudy Vol’nogo ekonomicheskogo obshchestva Rossii]. 2021. Vol. 230, N 4. P. 339–345. (In Russ.)

13. Ruhrmann H., Fritsch M., Leydesdorff L. Synergy and policy-making in German innovation systems: Smart Specialisation Strategies at national, regional, local levels? // Regional Studies. 2022. Vol. 56. N 9. P. 1468–1479. DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2021.1872780

14. Aganbegyan A. G. Experience of foreign countries in accelerated socio-economic growth and its possible use for Russia // Strategizing: Theory and Practice [Strategirovanie: teoriya i praktika]. 2024. Vol. 4. N 1. P. 1–26. https://doi.org/10.21603/2782-2435-2024-4-1-1-26 (In Russ.)

15. System for assessing and monitoring innovative development of Russian regions / I. M. Bort nik, G. I. Senchenya, N. N. Mikheeva [et al.] // Innovations [Innovacii]. 2012. N 9(167). P. 25–38.

16. Gamidullaeva L., Korostyshevskaya E., Myamlin A., Podkorytova O. Exploring regional industrial growth: does specialization explain it? // Economies. 2022. Vol. 10. N 7. P. 172.

17. Krugman P. The increasing returns revolution in trade and geography // American Economic Review. 2009. Vol. 99. P. 561–71.

18. Foray D., van Ark B. Smart specialisation in a truly integrated research area is the key to attracting more R&D to Europe by Dominique // Knowledge Economists Policy. 2007. N 1. P. 1–4.

19. Koen F., van Oort F., Verburg Th.N. Related variety, unrelated variety, and regional economic growth // Regional Studies 2007. Vol. 41. P. 685–97.

20. Foray D. Smart Specialisation: Opportunities and Challenges for Regional Innovation Policy (1st ed.). Routledge, 2014. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315773063

21. Kotov A. V. Determining the Smart Specialization of Russian Regions in the Context of Domestic and European Experience // Regional Research of Russia. 2021. N 11 (3). P. 378–386. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ygaavh. http://doi.org/10.1134/S207997052103008

22. Zemtsov S. P., Barinova V. A. Shift in the paradigm of regional innovation policy in Russia: from alignment to “Smart specialization” // Questions of Economics [Voprosy ekonomiki]. 2016. N 10. P. 65–81. (In Russ.)

23. Kutsenko E., Islankina E., Kindras A. Is it possible to be smart alone? A study of innovation strategies of Russian regions in the context of smart specialization // Foresight [Forsajt]. 2018. Vol. 12. N 1. P. 25–45. http://doi.org/10.17323/2500-2597.2018.1.25.45 (In Russ.)

24. Trippl M., Zukauskaite E., Healy A. Shaping smart specialization: the role of place-specific factors in advanced, intermediate and less-developed European regions // Regional Studies. 2020. Vol. 54. N 10. P. 1328–1340. DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2019.1582763

25. Klimanov V. V. Instruments of interregional interaction in the public administration system / V. V. Klimanov, S. M. Kazakova, V. A. Yagovkina // Regionalology [Regionologiya]. 2021. Vol. 29, N 2. P. 250–282. (In Russ.)

26. Kotov A. V. Evolution of spatial development instruments in Russia and the European Union: synchronicity or polarity? [Electronic resource] // II International scientific and practical conference “Concept and software and project tools for sustainable socio-economic development of territorial systems” [II Mezhdunarodnaya nauchno-prakticheskaya konferenciya «Koncepciya i programmno-proektnyj instrumentarij ustojchivogo social’no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya territorial’nyh sistem] S-TERRA 2023, Penza, November 23, 2023. URL: https://isprr.pnzgu.ru/files/isprr.pnzgu.ru/conf/s_terra_2023_ii/programma2.pdf (accessed: 23.02.2024) (In Russ.)