Strategic Assessment of Competitive Advantages of Russian Regions for the Creation of Open Diffuse Agglomerations

The article proposes a methodical approach to assess competitive advantages, determine the degree of readiness of regions to create a new type of agglomerations — open diffuse agglomerations. The need to develop open diffuse agglomerations is due to the requirements of strategy theory, strategizing methodology to use new asymmetric approaches to obtain breakthrough results.

The aim — to develop and test a methodological approach to a comprehensive assessment of the competitive advantages of Russian regions for the creation of open diffuse agglomerations.

Methods. The study is based on the general theory of strategy, the methodology of strategizing by academician V. L. Kvint, and the theory of competitive advantages by M. Porter. The methods of descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, rating assessments (with additive and multiplicative convolution of individual indicators), and cluster analysis were used.

Results. Competitive advantages of the region for the creation and development of open diffuse agglomerations should be assessed by indicators of demographic and economic density, urbanization, spatial concentration of population and economic activity, density and quality of roads. According to the results of rating assessments, cluster analysis, the Kemerovo Region — Kuzbass is among the leading regions of Russia in terms of readiness to create open diffuse agglomerations. The most pronounced competitive advantages are a high level of urbanization, a low degree of spatial concentration of population and economic activity, good quality of roads.

Conclusions. Kemerovo Region — Kuzbass has clear competitive advantages for the formation of open diffuse agglomerations, which allows for the successful implementation of the corresponding strategic priority for the development of the region.

1. Ansoff I. Strategic Management. Moscow: Economica, 1989. (In Russ.).

2. Kvint V. L. To the Origins of the Theory of Strategy. 200th Anniversary of the Publication of the Theoretical Work of General Jomini. St. Petersburg: NWIM — branch of RANEPA, 2017. (In Russ.).

3. Kvint V. L. The Concept of Strategizing. In 2 vol. Vol. 1. St. Petersburg: NWIM of RANEPA, 2019. (In Russ.).

4. Kvint V. L. The Concept of Strategizing. In 2 vol. Vol. 2. St. Petersburg: NWIM of RANEPA, 2020. (In Russ.).

5. Kvint V. L. The Concept of Strategizing. Kemerovo: Kemerovo State University, 2022. DOI 10.21603/978-5-8353-2562-7. (In Russ.).

6. Kvint V. L. Strategic Planning in Russia and the World: Importance of Human Interactions // Economics and Management [Ekonomika i upravleniye]. 2014. N 11. P. 15–17. (In Russ.).

7. Kvint V. L., Seredyuk I. V. Strategic assessment of the compliance of open diffuse agglomerations with global, national and regional trends (Kemerovo region — Kuzbass agglomerations case study) // Russian Journal of Industrial Economics [Ekonomika promyshlennosti]. 2025. Vol. 18. N 1. P. 7–23. DOI 10.17073/2072-1633-2025-1-1435. (In Russ.).

8. Clausewitz K. Principles of Warfare. Moscow: Tsentrpoligraf, 2009. (In Russ.).

9. Porter M. Competitive Strategy. Methodology of Analysis of Industries and Competitors. Moscow: Alpina Business Books, 2007. (In Russ.).

10. Seredyuk I. V. Open Diffuse Regional Agglomerations: Strategic Potential and Strategizing // Strategizing: Theory and Practice [Strategirovanie: teoriya i praktika]. 2024. Vol. 4. N 4. P. 420– 437. DOI 10.21603/2782-2435-2024-4-4-420-437. (In Russ.).

11. Adarkwah G.K., Dorobantu S., Sabel C. A., Zilja F. Geopolitical volatility and subsidiary investments // Strategic Management Journal. 2024. Vol. 45. N 11. P. 2275–2306. DOI 10.1002/smj.3631.

12. Andrews K.R. Can the best corporations be made moral? // Harvard Business Review. 1971. Vol. 51. N 3. P. 57–64.

13. Chandler A. D. Strategy and structure: chapters in the history of the American industrial enterprise. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 1969.

14. Choudhury A., Jandhyala S., Nandkumar A. Economic nationalism and the home court advantage // Strategic Management Journal. 2025. Vol. 46. N 1. P. 242–272. DOI 10.1002/smj.3658.

15. Corporate strategy and the theory of the firm in the digital age / M. Menz et al. // Journal of Management Studies. 2021. Vol. 58, N 7. P. 1695–1720. DOI 10.1111/joms.12760.

16. Doshi A.R., Bell J. J., Mirzayev E., Vanneste B. S. Generative artificial intelligence and evaluating strategic decisions // Strategic Management Journal. 2025. Vol. 46. N 3. P. 583–610. DOI 10.1002/smj.3677.

17. Drnevich P. L., Mahoney J. T., Schendel D. Has strategic management research lost its way? // Strategic Management Review. 2020. Vol. 1. N 1. P. 37–55. DOI 10.1561/111.00000004.

18. Foss N. J., Klein P. G. Do we need a “New Strategy Paradigm”? // Journal of Management Studies. 2025. Vol. 62. N 2. P. 986–1002. DOI 10.1111/joms.13081.

19. Kim J. H., Kwak J., Park H.-K. ESG as a nonmarket strategy to cope with geopolitical tension: Empirical evidence from multinationals’ ESG performance // Strategic Management Journal. 2025. Vol. 46. N 3. P. 693–722. DOI 10.1002/smj.3671.

20. Learned E. P., Christensen C.R., Andrews K.R., Guth W. D. Business Policy: Text and Cases. Homewood: Richard D. Irwin Inc., 1965.

21. Mintzberg H. The Rise and fall of Strategic Planning: Reconceiving Roles for Planning, Plans, Planners. New York: The Free Press, 1994.

22. Mintzberg H., Ahlstrand B., Lampel J. Strategy Safari: a Guide Tour through the Wilds of Strategic Management. New York: Simon& Schuster, Inc., 2005.

23. Rathje J., Katila R., Reineke P. Making the most of AI and machine learning in organizations and strategy research: Supervised machine learning, causal inference, and matching models // Strategic Management Journal. 2024. Vol. 45. N 10. P. 1926–1953. DOI 10.1002/smj.3604.