Finland and NATO: How the Forgetting of Lessons of the Past Can Lead to their Repetition
Abstract
In this article we are investigating Finland’s approach to participation in military-political alliances with its neighboring countries in the Baltic Sea region. The most active attempts to establish a regional system of collective security had been undertaken in 1920s - 1930s and were suspended shortly after the end of the Second World War. During the Cold War embeddedness of Finland into the «Nordic balance» system guaranteed strategic stability of the country in the system of complex military security relations between the Warsaw pact countries and the NATO. Furthermore being a neutral country, Finland was able to play a role of a helpful mediator between the USSR and the West. However the end of the Cold War triggered the return of Helsinki to the pursuit of an enhanced military-political integration with the European countries and the USA. Following this path for almost 25 years, Finland has abandoned its neutral status and reached the maximum possible level of integration with NATO. However, we claim that in the foreseeable future all discussions between Finnish experts and politicians about the necessity to join the NATO will not be implemented in practice for several reasons. Firstly, if Finland becomes a member of NATO, it will inevitable trigger a symmetrical military-political response from Russia and will create unnecessary difficulties in bilateral relations. Secondly, Finland has elaborated sucha sophisticated mechanism of military coordination with NATO countries, that the formal accession to the Alliance could be considered as just an excessive formality.
About the Authors
Irina Nikolaevna Novikova
Saint-Petersburg State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Nikolai Maratovich Mezhevich
Saint-Petersburg State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Baltic region. Conflicts and cooperation [Baltiiskii region. Konflikty i sotrudnichestvo] // Euroülikool, 2000. (rus)
2. Baryshnikov V. N. The Soviet-Finnish relations in 1940–1941 and the entry of Finland in World War II [Sovetsko-finlyandskie otnosheniya v 1940–1941 gg. i vstuplenie Finlyandii vo Vtoruyu mirovuyu voinu] // From war to the world: The USSR and Finland in 1939–1944. Collection of articles [Ot voiny k miru: SSSR i Finlyandiya v 1939–1944 gg. Sbornik statei]. SPb, 2006. (rus)
3. The declaration and the memorandum of Russia, Germany, Denmark and Sweden on the Baltic question, on April, 10(23), 1908 [Deklaratsiya i memorandum Rossii, Germanii, Danii i Shvetsii po Baltiiskomu voprosu, 10(23) aprelya 1908 g.] // World wars of the 20th century. Book 2. World War I. Documents and materials [Mirovye voiny XX veka. Kn. 2. Pervaya mirovaya voina. Dokumenty i materialy]. M., 2002. (rus)
4. Deryabin Yu. Finland: hard way to a neutrality [Finlyandiya: nelegkii put’ k neitralitetu] // Northern Europe. History problems [Severnaya Evropa. Problemy istorii]. M.: Science [Nauka], 2005. (rus)
5. Jokipii M. Finland on the way to war. Research about military cooperation of Germany and Finland in 1940–1941 [Finlyandiya na puti k voine. Issledovanie o voennom sotrudnichestve Germanii i Finlyandii v 1940–1941 gg.]. Petrozavodsk: Karelia publishing house [Izd-vo Kareliya], 1999. (rus)
6. Komarov A. A. USSR and Scandinavian defensive alliance (1948–1949) [SSSR i Skandinavskii oboronitel’nyi soyuz (1948–1949)] // Northern Europe. History problems [Severnaya Evropa. Problemy istorii]. M., 2003. Issue 3. P. 90–101. (rus)
7. Mezhevich N. M. Military planning of Estonia and Finland as a factor of formation of security systems in 1939 [Voennoe planirovanie Estonii i Finlyandii kak faktor formirovaniya sistem bezopasnosti v 1939 godu ] // World War II: myths of a legend, reality [Vtoraya mirovaya voina: mify legendy, real’nost’]. SPb. 2010. (rus)
8. Schelling T. Conflict strategy [Strategiya konflikta]. M.: Institute of distribution of information on social and economic sciences [IRISEN], 2007. (rus)
9. Anttila T. J. Uutta kupmanuutta etsimässä // Ulkopolitiikka. 2005. Is. 2.
10. Asmus R. American Views on Security and Cooperation in the Baltic Sea Region // 2nd Annual Stockholm Conference on Baltic Sea Security and Cooperation «Towards an Inclusive Security Structure in the Baltic Sea Region» / Ed. by Joseph P. Kuzich, Anna Fahraeus. Stockholm : 1997.
11. Browning C. Constructing Finnish National Identity and Foreign Policy, 1809–2000. Ph.D. Manuscript. University of Wales, Aberystwyth : 2003.
12. Lehti M. Baltic League as a construct of the new Europe: envisioning a Baltic region and small state sovereignty in the aftermath of the First World War. Frankfurt am Main, Berlin, Bern, New York, Paris, Wien : Lang, 1999.
13. Lehti M. Baltoscandia as a National Construction // Relations between the Nordic countries and the Baltic nations in the XX century. Turku : 1998.
14. Leskinen J. Vaiettu Suomen silta. Suomen ja Viron salainen sotilaallinen yhteistoiminta Neuvosto liiton varalta vuosina 1930–1939. Helsinki : 1997.
15. Lеskinen J. The silenced bridge of Finland Secret military cooperation between Finland and Estonian against the Soviet Union 1930–1939 // Russia and Finland in the XX century. SPb. : 1997. С. 124.
16. Nokkala A. Being Interested in a Big Neighbour: Russia and the Finnish Defence Establishment // Russia Forever? Towards Working Pragmatism in Finnish/Russian Relations. Aleksanteri Series. Helsinki : 2008.
17. Noreen Е. Den Nordiska Balansen: ett sakerhetspolotiskt begrepp i teori och praktik. Uppsala : Uppsala universitet, 1982.
18. Salo U. Estimation of security threats and Estonian defense planning in the 1930-s // Acta Historica Tallinnensia. 2008. Is. 12. P. 35–74.
19. Vihavainen T. Does history play a role in Finnish-Russian Relations? // The Two-Level Game: Russia’s Relations with Great Britain, Finland and the European Union / Ed. by H. Smith. Helsinki : Aleksanteri Papers. N 2. 2006.
20. Virmavirta J. Mielipide: Suomen kannattaa lunastaa Nato-optio // Ulkopolitiikka. 2005. Is. 4.
21. Williams M. C., Neumann I.B. From Alliance to Security Community: NATO, Russia and the Power of Identity // Millennium. 2000. Vol. 29. N 2. P. 357–387.
Review
For citations:
Novikova I.N., Mezhevich N.M. Finland and NATO: How the Forgetting of Lessons of the Past Can Lead to their Repetition. Administrative Consulting. 2016;(4):27-39. (In Russ.)
Views:
570
Email this article 