Ethics of Applying AI Technologies in Public Administration: Analysis of Public Opinion in St. Petersburg
EDN: RMIPXU
Abstract
Artificial intelligence technologies are increasingly being used to automate administrative processes, process big data, predict socio-economic indicators, and support managerial decision-making in the public administration system. However, with the new opportunities of these technologies, their use in public administration is associated with a number of sociohumanitarian threats in ensuring the rights of citizens and the security of the state, including: blurred responsibilities, lack of transparency in decision-making, data/sampling bias, etc. In addition, given the uniqueness of AI technologies, characterized by imitation of human cognitive functions, their use in public administration leads to a transformation of the model of state-citizen interaction, in which technology becomes the subject of communication on behalf of the state. In this regard, not only the lack of a unified system of ethical regulation of the introduction of AI technologies into the public sphere is particularly acute, but also the ongoing discussion about the very possibility of developing ethical recommendations for public authorities. Considering the institutionalized specifics of the state in ensuring the vital activity of society and the importance of trust in the power of citizens for its effective functioning, the attitude of citizens to the use of AI technologies in the context of ethical regulation is of interest. This is precisely what determines the purpose of the article, which is to characterize the opinion of residents of St. Petersburg on this issue, as one of the leading megacities of the Russian Federation with a high level of digitalization and developed infrastructure, demonstrating the active integration of AI solutions into the provision of public services and administration.
Keywords
About the Authors
Yu. A. TyurinaRussian Federation
Yulia A. Tyurina, Doctor of Science (Sociology), Professor of the Chair of State and Municipal Administration, Deputy Director for Science
St. Petersburg
S. V. Lyashko
Russian Federation
Svetlana V. Lyashko, Candidate of Sociological Sciences, Associate Professor, Leading Expert at the Center for Sociological Research
St. Petersburg
References
1. Arzamasov Yu. G. An integrated approach to the definition of artificial intelligence // Bulletin of the Voronezh State University. Series: Law [Vestnik Voronegskogo universiteta. Seria: Pravo] 2022. N 3 (50). P. 242–262. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17308/law/1995-5502/2022/3/242-262. EDN: WDNZXK
2. Berger P., Lukman T. Social construction of reality. A treatise on the sociology of knowledge / Translated by E. D. Rutkevich. Moscow : Medium, 1995. (In Russ.).
3. Bunkov A. V., Repin D. A., Shchegolev P. E. Legal problems of introducing AI technologies into the system of public administration and administration: Russian and international experience // Sociology and Law [Sociologia i pravo]. 2025. Vol. 17, N 3. P. 386–396. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.35854/2219-6242-2025-3-386-396. EDN: LFQMJD
4. Giddens E. Organization of society: An essay on the theory of structuration. 2nd ed. Moscow : Academic Project, 2005. (In Russ.). EDN TNIRKP
5. Goryan E. V. Ethical regulation of artificial intelligence as a factor of information security: the experience of Thailand [Electronic resource]. // Security issues [Voprosy bezopasnosty]. 2022. N 3. Р. 39–50. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.25136/2409-7543.2022.3.38626. EDN: RMFIRR
6. Kiselev A. S. The possibilities of legal leveling of political and organizational and managerial risks of using artificial intelligence // Bulletin of the Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia. Series: Legal Sciences [Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta drugby narodov. Seria: yuridicheskie nauki]. 2025. Vol. 29, N 2. P. 524–543. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.22363/2313-2337-2025-29-2-524-543. EDN: ZNDTRO
7. Parsons T. On the structure of social action / under the general editorship of V. F. Chesnokova and S. A. Belanovsky. Moscow : Academic Project, 2000. (In Russ.).
8. Seliverstova A. D. Opportunities and risks, ethical problems of using artificial intelligence in public administration // Humanities, socio-economic and social sciences [Gumanitarnie, socialno-ekonomicheskie i obshestvennie nauki]. 2024. N 3. P. 56–60. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.23672/SAE.2024.88.31.023. EDN: PWECRW
9. Smelzer N. Sociology [Course of lectures on general sociology for university students] / translated from English. Moscow : Phoenix, 1998. (In Russ.).
10. Fedorchenko S. N. Artificial intelligence in political forecasting: opportunities and limitations [Electronic resource] // Bulletin of the Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia. Series: Political Science. Sciences [Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta drugby narodov. Seria: Politologiya]. 2026. N 1. Р. 129–148. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/iskusstvennyy-intellekt-v-politicheskom-prognozirovanii-vozmozhnosti-i-ogranicheniya (In Russ.).
11. Shtompka P. Sociology of social change / P. Shtompka; translated from English. edited by V.Ya. Yadov. Moscow : Aspect-Press, 1996. 416 p. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Tyurina Yu.A., Lyashko S.V. Ethics of Applying AI Technologies in Public Administration: Analysis of Public Opinion in St. Petersburg. Administrative Consulting. 2026;(3):167–176. (In Russ.) EDN: RMIPXU
JATS XML


































