On Actual Issues of Interaction of Expert Community and Power: Conceptualization of a Role of Public Experts in Formation of the Agenda of the State

The article is devoted to a question of how when determining a strategic way of development of our country and forming versions of the solution of the developed crisis situations the political reports and drafts of program and strategic documents taking into account opinion of expert community defining the future of the country began to take the important place. This dialogue results from the institutionalized interaction of civil society with public authorities in questions of formation of consensus on the main priorities of social and economic development of the state. From the point of view of a structural and synchronic, functional research of the matters causes concern of a problem of subjective neglect about some experts and a number of heads about data, including statistical which scrupulously gather various institutes of the government. The article can be recommended for use in work of profile and expert community by consideration of the questions connected with expert maintenance of preparation and adoption of political decisions in the sphere of public administration.

open management, public boards and institutions, social control, examination, public authorities, political decision, development strategy of the state, the political elite, institutional interaction

1. Degtyarev A. A. Making political decisions [Prinyatie politicheskikh reshenii]. M.: KDU, 2004. 416 p. (rus)

2. Litvak B. G. Expert technologies in management [Ekspertnye tekhnologii v upravlenii]. Tutorial, 2nd edition. M.: Business [Delo], 2004. 400 p. (rus)

3. Miheev V. A. Institutes of civil society in policy and public administration [Instituty grazhdanskogo obshchestva v politike i gosudarstvennom upravlenii] // Power [Vlast’]. 2015. N 4. P. 53–57. (rus)

4. Miheev V. A. Russian Trilateral Commission on the Regulation of Social and Labour Relations as institute of coordination of interests [Rossiiskaya trekhstoronnyaya komissiya po regulirovaniyu sotsial’no-trudovykh otnoshenii kak institut soglasovaniya interesov] // Power [Vlast’]. 2013. N 4. P. 44–47. (rus)

5. Khrustalev M. A. Analysis of the international situations and political examination: sketches of the theory and methodology [Analiz mezhdunarodnykh situatsii i politicheskaya ekspertiza: ocherki teorii i metodologii]. Tutorial for higher education institutions. MGIMO University. MFA of Russia. M. : Aspect Press, 2015. 206 p. (rus)

6. Shabrov O. F. The state in the globalizing world: test by a postmodern [Gosudarstvo v globalizuyushchemsya mire: ispytanie postmodernom] // Power and policy: institutional calls of the 21st century. Political science: Year-book 2012 [Vlast’ i politika: institutsional’nye vyzovy XXI veka. Politicheskaya nauka: Ezhegodnik 2012] / Russian association of political science; chief editor A. I. Solovyov. M. : Russian political encyclopedia (ROSSPEN) [Rossiiskaya politicheskaya entsiklopediya], 2012. P. 87–101. (rus)