The Conflict in the South China Sea and Russian-Vietnamese Relations
Abstract
The article examines main aspects of the conflict in the South China Sea and the impact of this dispute on Russian-Vietnamese relations. The conflict for the Spratly and Paracel islands is considered as one of the most serious security challenges in the Asia-Pacific region. Vietnam might be called one of key participants of the dispute. Vietnam also plays significant role in the Russian policy in the Asia-Pacific. Close Russian-Vietnamese cooperation had been developing yet during the Cold War. Nowadays there are no serious contradictions between Russia and Vietnam. Two countries realize interaction in various spheres. Vietnam is the only Southeast Asia state - strategic partner of Russia. Russia keeps official neutral position in the conflict in the South China Sea, but at the same time it is indirectly involved in this dispute. The position of Russia towards the conflict in the South China Sea is mostly determined by status of partnership with participants of the dispute - China and Vietnam. Russia supports de-facto China in some cases (for instance, concerning critical attitude to «internationalization» of the South China Sea problem). Vietnam, in turn, claims for internationalization of the conflict to strengthen its positions in confrontation with China. At the same time Russia can help Vietnam to improve its conditions in the zone of the conflict by other means - through arms sales and joint energy projects. China is ready to agree with this trend of Russian-Vietnamese relations, because it is interested as in positive cooperation with Russia in general questions, so in Russian favorable neutrality in the South China Sea. So Russia has resources to protect its interests in Vietnam, improve positions of Vietnam in the South China Sea and contribute in stabilization of the conflict.
References
1. Do Min Kao. Vietnam and South China Sea: situation and tendencies [V’etnam i Yuzhno-Kitaiskoe more: obstanovka i tendentsii] // Vietnamese researches [V’etnamskie issledovaniya]. 2015. Issue 5. P. 138–160. (rus)
2. Ivanov A. V., Lukin A. V. Activization of foreign policy of China to the ATP and interests of Russia [Aktivizatsiya vneshnei politiki Kitaya v ATR i interesy Rossii] // Year-book of Institute of the international researches of MGIMO of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation [Ezhegodnik Instituta mezhdunarodnykh issledovanii MGIMO (U) MID Rossiiskoi Federatsii]. 2013. № 3. P. 155–178. (rus)
3. Kashin V. The Russian approach to problems of regional security to the ATP and the prospects of cooperation with Japan [Rossiiskii podkhod k problemam regional’noi bezopasnosti v ATR i perspektivy sotrudnichestva s Yaponiei]. M. : Moscow Center of Carnegie [Moskovskii Tsentr Karnegi], 2016. (rus)
4. Le Couyn Nga. Chinese-Vietnamese dispute on the South China Sea: historical aspect [Kitaiskov’etnamskii spor o Yuzhno-Kitaiskom more: istoricheskii aspect] // East. Afro-Asian societies: history and present [Vostok. Afro-Aziatskie obshchestva: istoriya i sovremennost’]. 2013. № 2. P. 114–123. (rus)
5. Leksyutina Ya. V. USA and China: lines of rivalry and contradictions [SShA i Kitai: linii sopernichestva i protivorechii]. SPb. : St.Petersburg State University [SPbGU], 2011. (rus)
6. Lokshin G. M. An aggravation of crisis in the South China Sea in 2014 [Obostrenie krizisa v Yuzhno-Kitaiskom more v 2014 g.] // Vietnamese researches [V’etnamskie issledovaniya]. 2015. Issue 5. P. 96–118. (rus)
7. Lokshin G. M. Political cooperation of Russia and Vietnam [Politicheskoe sotrudnichestvo Rossii i V’etnama] // Southeast Asia: Urgent problems of development [Yugo-Vostochnaya Aziya: Aktual’nye problemy razvitiya]. 2014. № 25. P. 55–63. (rus)
8. Lokshin G. M. South China Sea: difficult search of consent [Yuzhno-Kitaiskoe more: trudnyi poisk soglasiya]. M. : IFE RAS [IDV RAN], 2013. (rus)
9. Mazyrin V. M. Russia-Vietnam: 20 offers on increase in efficiency of comprehensive strategic partnership [Rossiya-V’etnam: 20 predlozhenii po povysheniyu effektivnosti vseob”emlyushchego strategicheskogo partnerstva]. Workbook № 23/2015. Russian council for the international affairs. M. : Special book [Spetskniga], 2015. (rus)
10. Mosyakov D. V. Events in the South China Sea as threat of regional stability and safety [Sobytiya v Yuzhno-Kitaiskom more kak ugroza regional’noi stabil’nosti i bezopasnosti] // Southeast Asia: Urgent problems of development [Yugo-Vostochnaya Aziya: Aktual’nye problemy razvitiya]. 2015. № 27. P. 16–22. (rus)
11. Murasheva G. F. Whether there is a status quo alternative in a territorial dispute in the South China Sea? [Est’ li al’ternativa status-kvo v territorial’nom spore v Yuzhno-Kitaiskom more?] // Southeast Asia: Urgent problems of development [Yugo-Vostochnaya Aziya: Aktual’nye problemy razvitiya]. 2013. № 20. P. 5–16. (rus)
12. Policy of the USA in the ATP in the period of B. Obama’s administration [Politika SShA v AziatskoTikhookeanskom regione v period administratsii B. Obamy] / ex. edition B.A. Shiryaev, I.A. Tsvetkov, Ya. V. Leksyutina. SPb. : St. Petersburg State University [SPbGU], 2012. (rus)
13. Syunnerberg M. A. The military conflict because of the islands Spratli in 1988: reaction in Vietnam [Voennyi konflikt iz-za ostrovov Spratli v 1988 g.: reaktsiya vo V’etname] // Southeast Asia: Urgent problems of development [Yugo-Vostochnaya Aziya: Aktual’nye problemy razvitiya]. 2014. № 23. P. 131–136. (rus)
14. Tsvetov A.P. Vietnam American rapprochement in 2014 – the beginning of 2015: tendencies, motives, restrictions [V’etnamo-amerikanskoe sblizhenie v 2014 — nachale 2015 gg.: tendentsii, motivy, ogranicheniya] // Southeast Asia: Urgent problems of development [Yugo-Vostochnaya Aziya: Aktual’nye problemy razvitiya]. 2015. № 26. P. 156–173. (rus)
15. Baev P.K., Tonneson S. Can Russia keep its special ties with Vietnam while moving closer and closer to China? // International Area Studies Review. 2015. Vol. 18. N 3. P. 312–325.
16. Chang F.K. China’s Naval Rise and the South China Sea: An Operational Assessment // Orbis. 2012. Vol. 56. Is. 1. P. 19–38
Review
For citations:
Fedorov N.V. The Conflict in the South China Sea and Russian-Vietnamese Relations. Administrative Consulting. 2016;(11):27-38. (In Russ.)
Views:
3040
Email this article 