Civil Society of Russia and Strengthening of Military Safety during an Era of Opposition of Civilizations
https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2017-9-18-28
Abstract
The purpose of the article is to consider some aspects of the problem of the influence of civil society on strengthening the country’s military security in the era of the civilizations’ confrontation. The state apparatus seeks to restrain the initiatives of civil society, sometimes doing it rashly. The activities of civil society itself in the field of ensuring of military security and strengthening patriotism are still unproductive due to its disunity and social amorphism. Effective symbiosis of the efforts of civil society and state authorities in the strengthening ofthe country’s military security requires balanced and reasonable steps on both sides. Therefore, patriotism acquires the status of a national idea, for only it can unite the ambiguous aspirations of state power and civil society.
About the Author
Andrey Andreevich Kovalev
North-West Institute of Management, Branch of RANEPA
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Batanova O. N. Russian world and problems of his formation [Russkii mir i problemy ego formirovaniya]: dissertation. M., 2009. 163 p. (rus)
2. Hegel G. W. F. Philosophy of Law [Filosofiya prava]. M. : Thought [Mysl’], 1990. 524 p. (rus)
3. Gorokhov P. A., Batezhenko V. V. Phenomena of reorganization quarter of the century later: experience of social and philosophical judgment [Fenomen perestroiki chetvert’ veka spustya: opyt sotsial’no-filosofskogo osmysleniya] // Messenger of the Orenburg State University [Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta]. 2010. N 7. P. 51–56. (rus)
4. Gulyga A. V. German classical philosophy [Nemetskaya klassicheskaya filosofiya]. M. : Rolf, 2001. 416 p. (rus)
5. Davtyan D. V. Civil control as a feedback mechanism in the course of interaction of the power and society [Grazhdanskii kontrol’ kak mekhanizm obratnoi svyazi v protsesse vzaimodeistviya vlasti i obshchestva] // Historical, philosophical, political and jurisprudence, cultural science and art criticism. Questions of the theory and practice [Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul’turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki]. 2012. N 7-2. P. 52–54. (rus)
6. Kovalev A.A. Information policy and military safety of Russia during an era of opposition of civilizations: theoretical and methodological aspects of a problem [Informatsionnaya politika i voennaya bezopasnost’ Rossii v epokhu protivostoyaniya tsivilizatsii: teoretiko-metodologicheskie aspekty problem]. St. Petersburg : Konovalov A. M., 2016. 194 p. (rus)
7. Lenin V. I. Complete works [Polnoe sobranie sochinenii] (5th edition). V. 26. M. : Politizdat, 1969. 591 p. (rus)
8. Marx K., Engels F. Chosen works [Izbrannye proizvedeniya]: V. 1. M. : Politizdat, 1980. 640 p. (rus)
9. Pivovar E. I. Russian Language and the Russian world as factors of sociocultural dialogue in the former Soviet Union [Russkii yazyk i russkii mir kak faktory sotsiokul’turnogo dialoga na postsovetskom prostranstve] // Materials of the international conference “Dialogue of cultures and partnership of civilizations: formation of global culture” [Materialy mezhdunarodnoi konferentsii «Dialog kul’tur i partnerstvo tsivilizatsii: stanovlenie global’noi kul’tury»]. SPb. : Publishing house of the St. Petersburg University of the Humanities and Social Sciences [Izd-vo SanktPeterburgskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta profsoyuzov], 2010. P. 167–170. (rus)
10. Fokin P. E. Alexander Zinovyev: Prometheus rejected [Aleksandr Zinov’ev: Prometei otvergnutyi]. M. : Young Guard [Molodaya gvardiya], 2016. 746 p. (rus)
Review
For citations:
Kovalev A.A. Civil Society of Russia and Strengthening of Military Safety during an Era of Opposition of Civilizations. Administrative Consulting. 2017;(9):18-28. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2017-9-18-28
Views:
611
Email this article 