State and Nation: Teleological Aspects of the Political Course of Scotland

The article deals with the teleological aspects of the national-state development of modern Scotland. The author expresses the idea that the teleology of the Scottish political course is a kind of antidote to British exclusiveness. Since the relationship between the state and society has always been difficult everywhere, there have always been various forms of statehood in history. Therefore, the author argues, as applied to the realities of British statehood, both unionist and nationalist teleologies mislead the researcher, as well as explanations of the internal and external determinants of the possible disintegration of Britain. It is concluded that the teleology of the political course of Scotland encourages the researcher to analyze the Union from comparative positions. The author believes that a more accurate and comprehensive analysis is needed to track integration and disintegration trends, as well as the revival of national identities over time. In the author’s opinion, such an analysis will allow the Union to be examined at four interrelated levels: functional changes, mass perception, elite strategies and the role of socio-political institutions. None of these levels is decisive, but they all interact and mutually affect each other. Thus, the place and role of Scotland in the evolution of the Union should be studied in a historical context with the involvement of the Scottish statenational experience in all its interpretations.

Scotland, Anglo-Scottish union (Union), state, nation, identity, unionism, nationalism, sovereignty, polity

1. Merkulov P. A., Turin E. A., Savinova E. N. Evolution of Scottish National Party in the fight for national self-determination of Scotland: to the question of features of scottish nationalism [Evolyutsiya Shotlandskoy natsionalnoy partii v borbe za natsionalnoye samoopredeleniye Shotlandii: k voprosu ob osobennostyakh shotlandskogo natsionalizma] // The Authority [Vlast]. 2017. N 6. P. 153–159. (rus)

2. Turin E.A., Savinova E. N. National style of development of political process in modern Scotland: to a question of the Scottish identity [Natsionalnyy stil razvitiya politicheskogo protsessa v sovremennoy Shotlandii: k voprosu o shotlandskoy identichnosti] // The Authority [Vlast]. 2015. N 4. P. 195–201. (rus)

3. Turin E. A., Savinova E. N. National sovereignty of Scotland in the context of public policy of management of natural resources [Natsionalnyy suverenitet Shotlandii v kontekste gosudarstvennoy politiki upravleniya prirodnymi resursami] // Central Russian Journal of Social Sciences [Srednerusskiy vestnik obshchestvennykh nauk]. 2014. N 2. P. 197–205. (rus)

4. Anderson B. Imagined Communities: ReXections on the Origins and Spread of Nationalism. London : Verso, 1983.

5. Bartolini S. Restructuring Europe. Oxford : Oxford University Press. 2005.

6. Bulpitt J. Territory and Power in the United Kingdom. An Interpretation. Manchester : Manchester University Press, 1983.

7. Davies N. The Isles. A History. London : Macmillan, 1999.

8. Deutsch K. Nationalism and Social Communication. An Inquiry into the Foundations of Nationality. 2nd ed. Cambridge, Mass. : MIT Press, 1966.

9. Durkheim E. The Division of Labour in Society. New York : Free Press, 1964.

10. Ferguson Y. H., Mansbach R. W. Polities: Authority, Identities, and Change. Columbia : University of South Carolina Press, 1996.

11. Kearney H. The British Isles. A History of Four Nations. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1995.

12. Keating M. State and Regional Nationalism. Territorial Politics and the European State. London : Harvester-Wheatsheaf, 1988.

13. Keating M. Culture and Social Sciences / M. Keating, D. della Porta (eds.). Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences. A Pluralist Perspective. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2008.

14. Keating M. Putting European Political Science Back Together. European Political Science Review. 1.2. 2009.

15. Mahoney J., Rueschemeyer D. Comparative Historical Analysis: Achievements and Agendas / J. Mahoney, D. Rueschemeyer (eds.). Comparative Historical Research. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2003.

16. Mill J.S. On Liberty, Utilitarianism, and Considerations on Representative Government. London : Dent, 1972.

17. Miller D. On Nationality. Oxford : Clarendon, 1995.

18. Nairn T. The Break-up of Britain: Crisis and Neo-nationalism. London : New Left Books, 1977.

19. Nairn T. After Britain. New Labour and the Return of Scotland. London : Granta, 2000.

20. Nairn T. Union on the Rocks. New Left Review. 43: 117–32. 2007.

21. Paasi A. Place and Region: Regional Worlds and Words. Progress in Human Geography. 26.6: 802–11. 2002

22. Pierson P. Politics in Time: History, Institutions and Social Analysis. Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press, 2004.

23. Pocock J. G.A. British History: A Plea for a New Subject. Journal of Modern History. 47.4: 601–28. 1975.

24. Rokkan S., Urwin D. W. Introduction: Centres and Peripheries in Western Europe / S. Rokkan, D. W. Urwin (eds.). The Politics of Territorial Identity: Studies in European Regionalism, London : Sage, 1982.

25. Rokkan S., Urwin D. W. Economy, Territory, Identity: Politics of West European Peripheries. London: Sage, 1983.

26. Scott J. England’s Troubles. Seventeenth-Century English Political Instability in European Context. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2000.

27. Spruyt H. The Sovereign State and Its Competitors. Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press, 1994.

28. Tilly C. ReXections on the History of European State-Making / Ch. Tilly (ed.). The Formation of National States in Western Europe. Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press, 1975.

29. Tilly C. Coercion, Capital, and European States, AD 990–1990. Cambridge, Mass. : Blackwell, 1990